Influence of Soil and Land-Use/Land-Cover Data Quality on SWAT Parameter Transferability in Small Subtropical Agricultural Watersheds

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Elzon C. Rippel, Daniel G. A. Piccilli, Latif Kalin, Rutinéia Tassi, Cristiano Gabriel Persch, Lueni Gonçalves Terra, André Pellegrini, Danilo Rheinheimer dos Santos
{"title":"Influence of Soil and Land-Use/Land-Cover Data Quality on SWAT Parameter Transferability in Small Subtropical Agricultural Watersheds","authors":"Elzon C. Rippel,&nbsp;Daniel G. A. Piccilli,&nbsp;Latif Kalin,&nbsp;Rutinéia Tassi,&nbsp;Cristiano Gabriel Persch,&nbsp;Lueni Gonçalves Terra,&nbsp;André Pellegrini,&nbsp;Danilo Rheinheimer dos Santos","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters is a cornerstone of Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB), yet the level of input-data detail required for reliable parameter transfer remains unclear, particularly in intensively managed agricultural landscapes with intra-annual land-use/land-cover (LULC) dynamics associated with multi-cropping systems. While recent studies have primarily focused on refining transfer techniques—such as proximity, similarity, regression, fuzzy clustering, or machine learning—the role of watershed descriptor quality has rarely been explored. Here, we evaluated how soil and LULC data quality control the transferability of SWAT parameters through a factorial proxy-basin experiment in two small subtropical agricultural watersheds in southern Brazil (WS80: 0.80 km<sup>2</sup>, WS140: 1.39 km<sup>2</sup>). Four scenarios crossed two levels of soil data quality (global HWSD at 1:5000000 vs. locally sampled at approximately 1:50000) with two levels of LULC representation (static default management vs. dynamic, EVI2-derived crop–livestock rotations). Calibration performance improved in WS80 from NSE = 0.16 under coarse soil and static LULC to NSE = 0.75 when dynamic LULC was included. Under direct parameter transfer, the combined fine-soil and dynamic-LULC scenario achieved satisfactory NSE in both target directions (0.56 and 0.55), compared with NSE = 0.06–0.25 under the baseline global-soil/static-LULC scenario. Post-transfer PBIAS ranged from −67.2% to +48.8% across coarse-soil scenarios, whereas the fine-soil/dynamic-LULC scenario reduced PBIAS to −39.9% and + 28.7%. Our findings show that, in small managed agricultural watersheds, improving the physical realism of watershed descriptors can substantially increase SWAT parameter transferability, and that both soil and dynamic LULC upgrades are needed to achieve satisfactory model performance with transferred parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"40 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70570","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters is a cornerstone of Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB), yet the level of input-data detail required for reliable parameter transfer remains unclear, particularly in intensively managed agricultural landscapes with intra-annual land-use/land-cover (LULC) dynamics associated with multi-cropping systems. While recent studies have primarily focused on refining transfer techniques—such as proximity, similarity, regression, fuzzy clustering, or machine learning—the role of watershed descriptor quality has rarely been explored. Here, we evaluated how soil and LULC data quality control the transferability of SWAT parameters through a factorial proxy-basin experiment in two small subtropical agricultural watersheds in southern Brazil (WS80: 0.80 km2, WS140: 1.39 km2). Four scenarios crossed two levels of soil data quality (global HWSD at 1:5000000 vs. locally sampled at approximately 1:50000) with two levels of LULC representation (static default management vs. dynamic, EVI2-derived crop–livestock rotations). Calibration performance improved in WS80 from NSE = 0.16 under coarse soil and static LULC to NSE = 0.75 when dynamic LULC was included. Under direct parameter transfer, the combined fine-soil and dynamic-LULC scenario achieved satisfactory NSE in both target directions (0.56 and 0.55), compared with NSE = 0.06–0.25 under the baseline global-soil/static-LULC scenario. Post-transfer PBIAS ranged from −67.2% to +48.8% across coarse-soil scenarios, whereas the fine-soil/dynamic-LULC scenario reduced PBIAS to −39.9% and + 28.7%. Our findings show that, in small managed agricultural watersheds, improving the physical realism of watershed descriptors can substantially increase SWAT parameter transferability, and that both soil and dynamic LULC upgrades are needed to achieve satisfactory model performance with transferred parameters.

Abstract Image

亚热带农业小流域土壤和土地利用/覆被数据质量对SWAT参数可转移性的影响
水文模型参数区划是未计量流域预测(PUB)的基石,但可靠参数转移所需的投入数据细节水平仍不清楚,特别是在集约管理的农业景观中,与多作系统相关的年度土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)动态。虽然最近的研究主要集中在改进迁移技术上,如接近性、相似性、回归、模糊聚类或机器学习,但很少探索分水岭描述符质量的作用。本文以巴西南部两个亚热带农业小流域(WS80: 0.80 km2, WS140: 1.39 km2)为研究对象,通过因子代理盆地试验,评估了土壤和LULC数据质量对SWAT参数可转移性的控制作用。四种场景跨越了两个层次的土壤数据质量(全球HWSD为1:50000,本地采样为约1:50000)和两个层次的LULC表示(静态默认管理vs动态,evi2衍生的作物-牲畜轮作)。在粗糙土壤和静态LULC条件下,WS80的NSE = 0.16提高到包含动态LULC条件下的NSE = 0.75。在参数直接传递的情况下,细土与动态- lulc联合情景在两个目标方向上的NSE均达到了令人满意的水平(0.56和0.55),而基线全球-土壤/静态- lulc情景下的NSE = 0.06-0.25。在粗土方案中,迁移后PBIAS介于- 67.2%至+48.8%之间,而在细土/动态lulc方案中,迁移后PBIAS分别降低至- 39.9%和+ 28.7%。研究结果表明,在小型管理农业流域,提高流域描述符的物理真实性可以显著提高SWAT参数的可转移性,并且需要土壤和动态LULC升级才能在转移参数下获得令人满意的模型性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书