Blind Spots in Product Design: Utilitarian–Hedonic Choices, Psychological Processes and Retail Strategy Interplay for Visually Impaired Consumers

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS
Bruno Veneziano Cornacchioni, Flávio Santino Bizarrias, Evandro Luiz Lopes, Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel, Ricardo Limongi
{"title":"Blind Spots in Product Design: Utilitarian–Hedonic Choices, Psychological Processes and Retail Strategy Interplay for Visually Impaired Consumers","authors":"Bruno Veneziano Cornacchioni,&nbsp;Flávio Santino Bizarrias,&nbsp;Evandro Luiz Lopes,&nbsp;Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel,&nbsp;Ricardo Limongi","doi":"10.1111/joca.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Visually impaired individuals represent a sizable segment of the global population but remain underrepresented in consumer research. Existing literature mainly frames visually impaired consumers (VICs) through a vulnerability lens, focusing on shopping barriers and assistive remedies. While valuable insights into retail accessibility and inclusion have emerged, little attention has been given to the product development stage, psychological processes, or retail strategies regarding choice. Across three controlled experiments, we examined how limited access to visual information affects product evaluation. Study 1 used a choice-based conjoint method for attribute evaluation; Study 2 tested psychological boundary conditions for variations in control and trust; and Study 3 established causal effects for utilitarian product and promotion type choices, showing that VICs prefer informative promotional appeals. Findings indicate that VICs rely on a narrower set of aesthetic signals and prioritize utilitarian attributes and information that reduce ambiguity. Conversely, sighted consumers respond more to hedonic features.</p>","PeriodicalId":47976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joca.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joca.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visually impaired individuals represent a sizable segment of the global population but remain underrepresented in consumer research. Existing literature mainly frames visually impaired consumers (VICs) through a vulnerability lens, focusing on shopping barriers and assistive remedies. While valuable insights into retail accessibility and inclusion have emerged, little attention has been given to the product development stage, psychological processes, or retail strategies regarding choice. Across three controlled experiments, we examined how limited access to visual information affects product evaluation. Study 1 used a choice-based conjoint method for attribute evaluation; Study 2 tested psychological boundary conditions for variations in control and trust; and Study 3 established causal effects for utilitarian product and promotion type choices, showing that VICs prefer informative promotional appeals. Findings indicate that VICs rely on a narrower set of aesthetic signals and prioritize utilitarian attributes and information that reduce ambiguity. Conversely, sighted consumers respond more to hedonic features.

Abstract Image

产品设计中的盲点:视障消费者的功利-享乐选择、心理过程与零售策略的相互作用
视障人士在全球人口中占相当大的比例,但在消费者研究中仍未得到充分代表。现有文献主要是通过脆弱性的视角来看待视障消费者,重点关注购物障碍和辅助补救措施。虽然关于零售可及性和包容性的宝贵见解已经出现,但很少有人关注产品开发阶段、心理过程或关于选择的零售策略。通过三个对照实验,我们研究了有限的视觉信息如何影响产品评估。研究1采用基于选择的联合方法进行属性评价;研究2测试了控制和信任变化的心理边界条件;研究3建立了功利产品和促销类型选择的因果关系,表明vic更喜欢信息性的促销呼吁。研究结果表明,vic依赖于一组较窄的美学信号,并优先考虑减少歧义的实用属性和信息。相反,视力正常的消费者对享乐特征的反应更强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The ISI impact score of Journal of Consumer Affairs now places it among the leading business journals and one of the top handful of marketing- related publications. The immediacy index score, showing how swiftly the published studies are cited or applied in other publications, places JCA seventh of those same 77 journals. More importantly, in these difficult economic times, JCA is the leading journal whose focus for over four decades has been on the interests of consumers in the marketplace. With the journal"s origins in the consumer movement and consumer protection concerns, the focus for papers in terms of both research questions and implications must involve the consumer"s interest and topics must be addressed from the consumers point of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书