Awareness, barriers, and uptake of colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2
Ammar Alotaibi, Razan Alhamidi, Abdulaziz Altamimi, Abdullah Althunayan, Muhammad F Mubarak, Saad Alkhowaiter, Ghazi Alotaibi, Noura Alhassan, Resheed Alkhiari, Majid Almadi
{"title":"Awareness, barriers, and uptake of colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ammar Alotaibi, Razan Alhamidi, Abdulaziz Altamimi, Abdullah Althunayan, Muhammad F Mubarak, Saad Alkhowaiter, Ghazi Alotaibi, Noura Alhassan, Resheed Alkhiari, Majid Almadi","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_108_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk for CRC. Colonoscopy is the recommended screening modality, yet uptake in this high-risk group remains poorly characterized, particularly in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of FDR of patients diagnosed with CRC at a tertiary academic center. They completed a structured questionnaire assessing awareness of CRC screening, previous screening practice, and perceived barriers to undergoing a colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 346 FDRs, 122 (35.3%) were aware of CRC screening recommendations and 78 (22.5%) had undergone colonoscopy. Among participants who had not undergone colonoscopy and provided complete barrier-response data ( n = 268), the most commonly reported barrier was lack of information or inadequate counseling (51.9%, n = 139), followed by psychological fear (17.9%, n = 48) and financial barriers (16.4%, n = 44). Colonoscopy uptake did not differ by gender (23.4% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.423) but was higher among those with higher educational attainment and medical backgrounds ( P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRC screening awareness and colonoscopy uptake among FDRs of CRC patients are suboptimal. Family-centered counseling at diagnosis, structured patient navigation, and tailored education programs are needed to improve screening participation in this at-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520774,"journal":{"name":"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_108_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk for CRC. Colonoscopy is the recommended screening modality, yet uptake in this high-risk group remains poorly characterized, particularly in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of FDR of patients diagnosed with CRC at a tertiary academic center. They completed a structured questionnaire assessing awareness of CRC screening, previous screening practice, and perceived barriers to undergoing a colonoscopy.

Results: Among 346 FDRs, 122 (35.3%) were aware of CRC screening recommendations and 78 (22.5%) had undergone colonoscopy. Among participants who had not undergone colonoscopy and provided complete barrier-response data ( n = 268), the most commonly reported barrier was lack of information or inadequate counseling (51.9%, n = 139), followed by psychological fear (17.9%, n = 48) and financial barriers (16.4%, n = 44). Colonoscopy uptake did not differ by gender (23.4% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.423) but was higher among those with higher educational attainment and medical backgrounds ( P = 0.001).

Conclusion: CRC screening awareness and colonoscopy uptake among FDRs of CRC patients are suboptimal. Family-centered counseling at diagnosis, structured patient navigation, and tailored education programs are needed to improve screening participation in this at-risk population.

一级亲属对结直肠癌筛查的认识、障碍和吸收:一项横断面研究。
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)患者的一级亲属(FDRs)发生CRC的风险增加。结肠镜检查是推荐的筛查方式,但在这一高危人群中,特别是在沙特阿拉伯,结肠镜检查的特点仍然很差。方法:我们在一个三级学术中心对诊断为结直肠癌的患者的FDR进行了横断面研究。他们完成了一份结构化的问卷,评估CRC筛查的意识、以前的筛查实践以及接受结肠镜检查的障碍。结果:在346名fdr中,122名(35.3%)了解CRC筛查建议,78名(22.5%)接受过结肠镜检查。在未接受结肠镜检查并提供完整障碍反应数据的参与者(n = 268)中,最常见的障碍是缺乏信息或咨询不足(51.9%,n = 139),其次是心理恐惧(17.9%,n = 48)和经济障碍(16.4%,n = 44)。结肠镜检查的使用在性别上没有差异(23.4%比19.7%,P = 0.423),但在教育程度和医学背景较高的人群中(P = 0.001)。结论:结直肠癌患者fdr的结直肠癌筛查意识和结肠镜检查接受度不理想。需要以家庭为中心的诊断咨询、结构化的患者导航和量身定制的教育计划,以提高这一高危人群的筛查参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书