Alexandra Paule, Soizic Masson, Johan Rose Dite Modestine, Norelyakin Kara, David Taieb, Emeline Colomba, Guillaume Crespel, Philippe D'Abadie, Karim Fard
{"title":"Role of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI in Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Prostatectomy.","authors":"Alexandra Paule, Soizic Masson, Johan Rose Dite Modestine, Norelyakin Kara, David Taieb, Emeline Colomba, Guillaume Crespel, Philippe D'Abadie, Karim Fard","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.126.272126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/CT and pelvic MRI are useful for assessing biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy. We evaluated the role of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI in a 1-stop-shop protocol combining a single injection of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA, followed by pelvic PET/multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and whole-body PET/CT acquisitions for the detection of recurrent disease. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 106 consecutive patients referred to our institute for biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy using a 1-stop-shop protocol comprising whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/CT and pelvic <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/mpMRI. Each imaging modality was reviewed in a blinded manner by 2 independent, experienced readers. <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI, with positivity on either MRI or PSMA PET, served as the reference standard. <b>Results:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI detected more local recurrences (<i>n</i> = 52, 49.06%) compared with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/CT (<i>n</i> = 42, 39.62%) and mpMRI (<i>n</i> = 46, 43.00%). Discordant cases accounted for 18 patients (17%): 10% were positive only on MRI and 7% only on PSMA PET. Compared with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI, both mpMRI and <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET demonstrated similar performance, with sensitivities of 88.5% and 78.8% and specificities of 100% and 98.1%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI outperformed PET/CT and mpMRI in the detection of local recurrences of prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1385-1391"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.126.272126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
18F-PSMA PET/CT and pelvic MRI are useful for assessing biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy. We evaluated the role of 18F-PSMA PET/MRI in a 1-stop-shop protocol combining a single injection of 18F-PSMA, followed by pelvic PET/multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and whole-body PET/CT acquisitions for the detection of recurrent disease. Methods: We evaluated 106 consecutive patients referred to our institute for biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy using a 1-stop-shop protocol comprising whole-body 18F-PSMA PET/CT and pelvic 18F-PSMA PET/mpMRI. Each imaging modality was reviewed in a blinded manner by 2 independent, experienced readers. 18F-PSMA PET/MRI, with positivity on either MRI or PSMA PET, served as the reference standard. Results:18F-PSMA PET/MRI detected more local recurrences (n = 52, 49.06%) compared with 18F-PSMA PET/CT (n = 42, 39.62%) and mpMRI (n = 46, 43.00%). Discordant cases accounted for 18 patients (17%): 10% were positive only on MRI and 7% only on PSMA PET. Compared with 18F-PSMA PET/MRI, both mpMRI and 18F-PSMA PET demonstrated similar performance, with sensitivities of 88.5% and 78.8% and specificities of 100% and 98.1%, respectively. Conclusion:18F-PSMA PET/MRI outperformed PET/CT and mpMRI in the detection of local recurrences of prostate cancer.