Prediction of the Statin responders with radiomics.

Sang-Eun Lee, Youngtaek Hong, Juyeong Jung, Ji Min Sung, Daniele Andreini, Mouaz H Al-Mallah, Matthew J Budoff, Filippo Cademartiri, Kavitha Chinnaiyan, Jung Hyun Choi, Eun Ju Chun, Edoardo Conte, Ilan Gottlieb, Martin Hadamitzky, Yong Jin Kim, Byoung Kwon Lee, Jonathon A Leipsic, Erica Maffei, Hugo Marques, Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Gianluca Pontone, Sanghoon Shin, Peter H Stone, Habib Samady, Renu Virmani, Jagat Narula, Leslee J Shaw, Jeroen J Bax, Fay Y Lin, James K Min, Hyuk-Jae Chang
{"title":"Prediction of the Statin responders with radiomics.","authors":"Sang-Eun Lee, Youngtaek Hong, Juyeong Jung, Ji Min Sung, Daniele Andreini, Mouaz H Al-Mallah, Matthew J Budoff, Filippo Cademartiri, Kavitha Chinnaiyan, Jung Hyun Choi, Eun Ju Chun, Edoardo Conte, Ilan Gottlieb, Martin Hadamitzky, Yong Jin Kim, Byoung Kwon Lee, Jonathon A Leipsic, Erica Maffei, Hugo Marques, Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Gianluca Pontone, Sanghoon Shin, Peter H Stone, Habib Samady, Renu Virmani, Jagat Narula, Leslee J Shaw, Jeroen J Bax, Fay Y Lin, James K Min, Hyuk-Jae Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2026.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statins are a cornerstone medication for coronary atherosclerosis. This study assessed whether radiomic analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could predict patient response to statin therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from a multinational registry with serial CCTA (≥2-year intervals) on statin therapy were analyzed. Radiomic scores were calculated, categorizing patients as statin responders or non-responders (≥1.0% increase in percent atheroma volume (PAV) per year indicated non-response). Data were split into training (79%) and test (21%) sets based on sites. Four predictive models were developed: Model 1 used clinical risk factors (CRF), Model 2 included CRF, calcified and non-calcified PAV, and number of high-risk plaques. Model 3 used only the radiomic score, and Model 4 combined Models 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 statin responders (mean age 61.2 ​± ​8.4 years, 60.1% male) and 177 statin non-responders (mean age 63.2 ​± ​9.0 years, 44.1% male) were analyzed. Model 3, based solely on the radiomic score, demonstrated superior predictive power compared to Model 1 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.75 [0.67-0.83] vs 0.54 [0.45-0.63], p ​< ​0.05) and was comparable to Model 2 (AUC [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.74-0.88], p ​> ​0.05) in the test set. Model 4 exhibited the highest power (AUC [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.77-0.90], all p ​< ​0.05 compared to Model 2 and Model 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTA radiomic features show proof-of-concept for predicting statin response, warranting further validation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0280341.</p>","PeriodicalId":94071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2026.05.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Statins are a cornerstone medication for coronary atherosclerosis. This study assessed whether radiomic analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could predict patient response to statin therapy.

Methods: Patients from a multinational registry with serial CCTA (≥2-year intervals) on statin therapy were analyzed. Radiomic scores were calculated, categorizing patients as statin responders or non-responders (≥1.0% increase in percent atheroma volume (PAV) per year indicated non-response). Data were split into training (79%) and test (21%) sets based on sites. Four predictive models were developed: Model 1 used clinical risk factors (CRF), Model 2 included CRF, calcified and non-calcified PAV, and number of high-risk plaques. Model 3 used only the radiomic score, and Model 4 combined Models 2 and 3.

Results: A total of 386 statin responders (mean age 61.2 ​± ​8.4 years, 60.1% male) and 177 statin non-responders (mean age 63.2 ​± ​9.0 years, 44.1% male) were analyzed. Model 3, based solely on the radiomic score, demonstrated superior predictive power compared to Model 1 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.75 [0.67-0.83] vs 0.54 [0.45-0.63], p ​< ​0.05) and was comparable to Model 2 (AUC [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.74-0.88], p ​> ​0.05) in the test set. Model 4 exhibited the highest power (AUC [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.77-0.90], all p ​< ​0.05 compared to Model 2 and Model 3).

Conclusion: CCTA radiomic features show proof-of-concept for predicting statin response, warranting further validation.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0280341.

放射组学预测他汀类药物应答者。
背景:他汀类药物是治疗冠状动脉粥样硬化的基础药物。本研究评估了冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)放射组学分析是否可以预测患者对他汀类药物治疗的反应。方法:对来自多国注册的连续CCTA(≥2年间隔)接受他汀类药物治疗的患者进行分析。计算放射组评分,将患者分为他汀类药物反应者或无反应者(动脉粥样瘤体积百分比(PAV)每年增加≥1.0%表示无反应)。数据根据地点分为训练集(79%)和测试集(21%)。建立了四种预测模型:模型1使用临床危险因素(CRF),模型2包括CRF、钙化和非钙化PAV以及高危斑块数量。模型3仅使用放射学评分,模型4结合模型2和模型3。结果:共分析了386例他汀类药物应答者(平均年龄61.2±8.4岁,男性60.1%)和177例他汀类药物无应答者(平均年龄63.2±9.0岁,男性44.1%)。模型3仅基于放射组学评分,与模型1相比(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC][95%置信区间(CI)]: 0.75 [0.67-0.83] vs 0.54 [0.45-0.63], p < 0.05),在测试集中与模型2 (AUC [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.74-0.88], p > 0.05)相当。模型4的功率最高(AUC [95% CI]: 0.84[0.77 ~ 0.90],与模型2和模型3比较,p均< 0.05)。结论:CCTA放射学特征显示了预测他汀类药物反应的概念验证,需要进一步验证。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0280341。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书