Improvement of Checklist for Briefing in Apheresis Therapy and Its Efficacy.

IF 1.2
Makiko Suzuki, Hajime Hirano, Takahiro Inoue, Yu Munakata, Yoshie Tokui, Ken Ito, Hiromi Horimoto, Takashi Kumamaru, Isao Tanaka, Kaori Yamazaki, Goki Matsumura, Yuko Shimizu, Osamu Segawa, Katsuji Nishimura, Norio Hanafusa
{"title":"Improvement of Checklist for Briefing in Apheresis Therapy and Its Efficacy.","authors":"Makiko Suzuki, Hajime Hirano, Takahiro Inoue, Yu Munakata, Yoshie Tokui, Ken Ito, Hiromi Horimoto, Takashi Kumamaru, Isao Tanaka, Kaori Yamazaki, Goki Matsumura, Yuko Shimizu, Osamu Segawa, Katsuji Nishimura, Norio Hanafusa","doi":"10.1002/1744-9987.70166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A checklist is an effective tool for ensuring patient safety. We have already been using a briefing checklist for hemodialysis. However, we did not have ones for apheresis therapy. From the experiences of incidents that occurred in February and March 2024. We decided to create a briefing checklist for apheresis therapy, especially for plasma exchange (PE) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we made a briefing checklist specific to apheresis therapies, different from hemodialysis. Another incident occurred 6 months later, revealing that staff used the checklist in a manner different from the intended one. The fact prompted us to revise the apheresis therapy checklist, with items and the order of appearance similar to those of the hemodialysis checklist. We also provided detailed explanations of apheresis therapy for clinical engineers unfamiliar with it. We have not experienced any incident since September 2024, when the revised procedures were implemented, until May 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The briefing checklist provided benefits, including improved patient safety and education for clinical engineers unfamiliar with apheresis. the revision process further improved the checklist's efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"471-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1744-9987.70166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A checklist is an effective tool for ensuring patient safety. We have already been using a briefing checklist for hemodialysis. However, we did not have ones for apheresis therapy. From the experiences of incidents that occurred in February and March 2024. We decided to create a briefing checklist for apheresis therapy, especially for plasma exchange (PE) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP).

Methods: First, we made a briefing checklist specific to apheresis therapies, different from hemodialysis. Another incident occurred 6 months later, revealing that staff used the checklist in a manner different from the intended one. The fact prompted us to revise the apheresis therapy checklist, with items and the order of appearance similar to those of the hemodialysis checklist. We also provided detailed explanations of apheresis therapy for clinical engineers unfamiliar with it. We have not experienced any incident since September 2024, when the revised procedures were implemented, until May 2025.

Conclusion: The briefing checklist provided benefits, including improved patient safety and education for clinical engineers unfamiliar with apheresis. the revision process further improved the checklist's efficiency.

采后治疗简报表的改进及疗效分析。
目的:检查表是确保患者安全的有效工具。我们已经使用了血液透析的简要清单。然而,我们还没有采空疗法。从2024年2月和3月发生的事件的经验来看。我们决定为血浆置换治疗,特别是血浆置换(PE)和双滤血浆置换(DFPP)创建一份简要清单。方法:首先,我们制作了一份不同于血液透析的单采治疗的简要清单。6个月后发生了另一起事件,显示工作人员以与预期不同的方式使用清单。这一事实促使我们修改了单采治疗清单,其项目和外观顺序与血液透析清单相似。我们也为不熟悉的临床工学技士详细讲解了采血疗法。自2024年9月实施修订后的程序以来,直到2025年5月,我们没有发生任何事故。结论:简要检查表提供了好处,包括提高患者安全性和对不熟悉采血的临床工学技士的教育。修订过程进一步提高了清单的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书