Beyond Perceptions: Meta-Analyses on Observed Parent-Child Interaction Behaviors and Childhood and Adolescent Depression.

IF 7.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Wilma G M Wentholt, Marc L Molendijk, Loes H C Janssen, Lisanne A E M van Houtum, Marieke S Tollenaar, Lenneke R A Alink, Bernet M Elzinga
{"title":"Beyond Perceptions: Meta-Analyses on Observed Parent-Child Interaction Behaviors and Childhood and Adolescent Depression.","authors":"Wilma G M Wentholt, Marc L Molendijk, Loes H C Janssen, Lisanne A E M van Houtum, Marieke S Tollenaar, Lenneke R A Alink, Bernet M Elzinga","doi":"10.1007/s10567-026-00572-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A lack of positive and the presence of negative parenting are frequently mentioned as risk factors for the development and maintenance of childhood and adolescent depression. However, meta-analytic research is mostly based on parenting as perceived by the child or parent, with the potential risk of a reporter bias. Also, specific patterns of observed child behavior among children with childhood depression are often overlooked and there currently is no meta-analysis on this topic. The current meta-analyses integrate the cross-sectional and longitudinal relation between observed parenting and childhood depression, and the cross-sectional relation between observed child behavior and childhood depression. This preregistered study (k = 90) includes 350 effect sizes on five observed parenting behaviors and 131 effect sizes on six observed child behaviors in parent-child interactions that were found via PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses (until the end of September 2024). Multilevel meta-analyses show that parental warmth/support and harsh control/criticism co-occur with and precede childhood depression, with small effect sizes, while childhood depression generally did not precede negative parenting. This aligns with previous research based on subjective reports, indicating that low parental warmth and higher criticism may form risk factors for childhood depression. Observed parental autonomy granting, guidance/structure, and parental depressed affect did not relate to childhood depression. Further, children with depression showed more negative affect, reduced autonomy and engagement, illustrating the interactional challenges these families face. Family interventions could validate and address the challenges posed to children as well as parents in families with a child with depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"535-570"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-026-00572-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A lack of positive and the presence of negative parenting are frequently mentioned as risk factors for the development and maintenance of childhood and adolescent depression. However, meta-analytic research is mostly based on parenting as perceived by the child or parent, with the potential risk of a reporter bias. Also, specific patterns of observed child behavior among children with childhood depression are often overlooked and there currently is no meta-analysis on this topic. The current meta-analyses integrate the cross-sectional and longitudinal relation between observed parenting and childhood depression, and the cross-sectional relation between observed child behavior and childhood depression. This preregistered study (k = 90) includes 350 effect sizes on five observed parenting behaviors and 131 effect sizes on six observed child behaviors in parent-child interactions that were found via PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses (until the end of September 2024). Multilevel meta-analyses show that parental warmth/support and harsh control/criticism co-occur with and precede childhood depression, with small effect sizes, while childhood depression generally did not precede negative parenting. This aligns with previous research based on subjective reports, indicating that low parental warmth and higher criticism may form risk factors for childhood depression. Observed parental autonomy granting, guidance/structure, and parental depressed affect did not relate to childhood depression. Further, children with depression showed more negative affect, reduced autonomy and engagement, illustrating the interactional challenges these families face. Family interventions could validate and address the challenges posed to children as well as parents in families with a child with depression.

超越知觉:观察到的亲子互动行为与儿童和青少年抑郁的meta分析。
缺乏积极和消极的养育方式经常被认为是儿童和青少年抑郁症发展和维持的危险因素。然而,元分析研究大多是基于孩子或父母所感知的养育方式,存在报道偏倚的潜在风险。此外,观察到的儿童抑郁症儿童的特定行为模式经常被忽视,目前还没有关于这一主题的荟萃分析。目前的meta分析整合了观察到的父母教养与儿童抑郁之间的横断面和纵向关系,以及观察到的儿童行为与儿童抑郁之间的横断面关系。这项预注册的研究(k = 90)包括对5种观察到的父母行为的350个效应量和对6种观察到的亲子互动中儿童行为的131个效应量,这些效应量是通过PsychINFO、Web of Science和Proquest博士论文和论文(截至2024年9月底)发现的。多水平荟萃分析表明,父母的温暖/支持和严厉的控制/批评与儿童抑郁同时发生并先于儿童抑郁,影响量较小,而儿童抑郁通常不先于消极父母。这与先前基于主观报告的研究一致,表明父母的低温暖和更高的批评可能形成儿童抑郁症的风险因素。观察到的父母自主授予、指导/结构和父母抑郁影响与儿童抑郁无关。此外,患有抑郁症的儿童表现出更多的负面影响,自主性和参与度降低,说明这些家庭面临的互动挑战。家庭干预可以验证和解决儿童以及有抑郁症儿童的家庭中的父母所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书