A collaborative radiologist-sonographer ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration service in the head and neck: Experience from a tertiary centre.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Amjad Chamsi Basha, Peter Cantin, Shahed Chamsi Basha, Louise Darwich, Bradley J Storey, Catalina Poseletchi, Richard Chaytor, Abdul Gafoor
{"title":"A collaborative radiologist-sonographer ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration service in the head and neck: Experience from a tertiary centre.","authors":"Amjad Chamsi Basha, Peter Cantin, Shahed Chamsi Basha, Louise Darwich, Bradley J Storey, Catalina Poseletchi, Richard Chaytor, Abdul Gafoor","doi":"10.1177/1742271X261449465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fine-needle aspiration is a recommended, minimally invasive test that may be performed by radiologists and advanced practice sonographers to meet increasing service demands. Adequacy rates vary significantly in the published literature.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the adequacy rate of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in head and neck lesions between operator groups: radiologists and sonographers. Other factors that may potentially affect adequacy rates such as the number of passes, use of local anaesthetic, sample tissue type and needle gauge have also been investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of the local radiology reporting system of all ultrasound-guided head and neck fine needle aspiration samples over a 3-year period was undertaken. Correlation was made with the final cytology report to assess for sample adequacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 927 fine needle aspiration samples were included. Of these, 331 (35.7%) were taken by radiologists, and 596 (64.3%) were taken by sonographers. Both groups achieved similar adequacy rates (~84%), and no statistical difference was seen between operator type and adequacy rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides a good example of a cohesive department where both radiologists and sonographers contribute to a consistent and equitable service.</p>","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":"1742271X261449465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13229905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X261449465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fine-needle aspiration is a recommended, minimally invasive test that may be performed by radiologists and advanced practice sonographers to meet increasing service demands. Adequacy rates vary significantly in the published literature.

Purpose: To assess the adequacy rate of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in head and neck lesions between operator groups: radiologists and sonographers. Other factors that may potentially affect adequacy rates such as the number of passes, use of local anaesthetic, sample tissue type and needle gauge have also been investigated.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of the local radiology reporting system of all ultrasound-guided head and neck fine needle aspiration samples over a 3-year period was undertaken. Correlation was made with the final cytology report to assess for sample adequacy.

Results: In total, 927 fine needle aspiration samples were included. Of these, 331 (35.7%) were taken by radiologists, and 596 (64.3%) were taken by sonographers. Both groups achieved similar adequacy rates (~84%), and no statistical difference was seen between operator type and adequacy rate.

Conclusion: Our study provides a good example of a cohesive department where both radiologists and sonographers contribute to a consistent and equitable service.

超声引导下头颈部细针抽吸服务:来自三级中心的经验。
背景:细针抽吸是一种推荐的微创检查,可由放射科医生和高级实践超声医师进行,以满足日益增长的服务需求。在已发表的文献中,充分率差异很大。目的:评价超声引导下头颈部病变细针抽吸在放射科医师和超声医师两组操作人员中的充分率。其他可能影响充分率的因素,如通过次数、局部麻醉的使用、样本组织类型和针规也进行了调查。材料与方法:回顾性分析3年来超声引导下所有头颈部细针穿刺标本的局部放射学报告系统。与最终的细胞学报告相关联,以评估样本是否充足。结果:共纳入927份细针抽吸标本。其中,331名(35.7%)由放射科医生接诊,596名(64.3%)由超声技师接诊。两组的充分率相似(约84%),操作人员类型和充分率之间无统计学差异。结论:我们的研究提供了一个很好的例子,一个有凝聚力的部门,放射科医生和超声技师都为一致和公平的服务做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound
Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书