Health risk assessment of wildfire smoke exposure: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chala Daba Yadate, Daniel Odo, Md Rezanur Rahaman, Hilary Bambrick, Michael Tong
{"title":"Health risk assessment of wildfire smoke exposure: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chala Daba Yadate, Daniel Odo, Md Rezanur Rahaman, Hilary Bambrick, Michael Tong","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03226-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wildfire, driven by climate change, continues to pose significant health, social, economic and environmental challenges in the twenty-first century. Although the association between wildfire smoke exposure and health outcomes has been studied, comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the global health risks of wildfire smoke exposure are lacking, and the quality and strength of evidence remain uncertain. Therefore, we aim to undertake a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the health risks associated with wildfire smoke exposure at global, regional and national levels in the context of climate change, evaluate the quality and strength of available evidence and identify evidence gaps for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will adhere to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-2020) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched to identify relevant articles. A group of researchers will independently screen the retrieved articles using Covidence, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis will be performed for the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis will be performed using R software (version 4.3) to determine the pooled association between wildfire smoke air pollutants and health outcomes. Higgins' I<sup>2</sup> and Egger's test will be employed to assess heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. Sensitivity and sub-group analysis will also be performed. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human Studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The strength of evidence will be rated as either sufficient, limited, inadequate, or lacking according to the Navigation Guide Framework.</p><p><strong>Discussions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis will explore the health risk associated with wildfire smoke exposure across global, regional and national levels encompassing a range of climate zones. The findings from this meta-analysis will provide updated evidence to guide policy makers and communities in efforts to reduce mortality and morbidity associated with wildfire-related air pollutants. The results will also help healthcare providers and emergency responders in managing the growing health risk of wildfire-related air pollutant smoke exposure.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420250654944.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03226-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wildfire, driven by climate change, continues to pose significant health, social, economic and environmental challenges in the twenty-first century. Although the association between wildfire smoke exposure and health outcomes has been studied, comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the global health risks of wildfire smoke exposure are lacking, and the quality and strength of evidence remain uncertain. Therefore, we aim to undertake a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the health risks associated with wildfire smoke exposure at global, regional and national levels in the context of climate change, evaluate the quality and strength of available evidence and identify evidence gaps for future research.

Methods: This review will adhere to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-2020) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched to identify relevant articles. A group of researchers will independently screen the retrieved articles using Covidence, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis will be performed for the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis will be performed using R software (version 4.3) to determine the pooled association between wildfire smoke air pollutants and health outcomes. Higgins' I2 and Egger's test will be employed to assess heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. Sensitivity and sub-group analysis will also be performed. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human Studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The strength of evidence will be rated as either sufficient, limited, inadequate, or lacking according to the Navigation Guide Framework.

Discussions: This systematic review and meta-analysis will explore the health risk associated with wildfire smoke exposure across global, regional and national levels encompassing a range of climate zones. The findings from this meta-analysis will provide updated evidence to guide policy makers and communities in efforts to reduce mortality and morbidity associated with wildfire-related air pollutants. The results will also help healthcare providers and emergency responders in managing the growing health risk of wildfire-related air pollutant smoke exposure.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420250654944.

野火烟雾暴露的健康风险评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析的方案。
背景:在气候变化的驱动下,野火在21世纪继续构成重大的健康、社会、经济和环境挑战。虽然已经研究了野火烟雾暴露与健康结果之间的关系,但缺乏对野火烟雾暴露的全球健康风险的全面系统评价和荟萃分析,证据的质量和强度仍然不确定。因此,我们的目标是进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估在气候变化背景下全球、区域和国家层面与野火烟雾暴露相关的健康风险,评估现有证据的质量和强度,并为未来的研究确定证据缺口。方法:本综述将遵循更新后的系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA-2020)指南。将检索PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science以确定相关文章。一组研究人员将根据纳入和排除标准,使用covid - ence独立筛选检索到的文章。将对纳入的研究进行叙述综合。将使用R软件(4.3版)进行随机效应荟萃分析,以确定野火烟雾、空气污染物与健康结果之间的综合关联。Higgins’2检验和Egger’s检验将分别用于评估异质性和发表偏倚。敏感性和亚组分析也将进行。偏倚风险将使用健康评估办公室和人类研究翻译偏倚风险评级工具进行评估。《建议分级评估、发展和评估指南》将用于评估证据的质量。根据《导航指南框架》,证据的强度将被评为充分、有限、不充分或缺乏。讨论:本系统综述和荟萃分析将探讨涉及一系列气候带的全球、区域和国家层面与野火烟雾暴露相关的健康风险。这项荟萃分析的结果将为指导政策制定者和社区努力降低与野火相关的空气污染物相关的死亡率和发病率提供最新证据。研究结果还将帮助医疗保健提供者和应急人员管理与野火有关的空气污染物烟雾暴露所带来的日益增长的健康风险。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD420250654944。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书