Efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abat Khan, Hira Habib, Ayesha Imran Butt, Iftikhar Khan, Khushbakhat Aziz, Ehsanullah Alokozay, Haneen Kamran, Soban Ali Qasim, Ammara Saleem, Shaiq Ijaz, Bilal Khan, Muhammad Siddique Karimi, Saad Javed Malik, Asim Elahi, Jose Sandoval-Sus
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abat Khan, Hira Habib, Ayesha Imran Butt, Iftikhar Khan, Khushbakhat Aziz, Ehsanullah Alokozay, Haneen Kamran, Soban Ali Qasim, Ammara Saleem, Shaiq Ijaz, Bilal Khan, Muhammad Siddique Karimi, Saad Javed Malik, Asim Elahi, Jose Sandoval-Sus","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03216-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly for patients ineligible for stem-cell transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy. Loncastuximab tesirine, a CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated promising single-agent activity in recent studies and is approved in this setting. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until March 2025. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy with defined efficacy and safety endpoints were included. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including three clinical trials and four observational cohort studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Pooled analyses were conducted in R (version 4.5.1) using absolute risk and random-effects modeling. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic; publication bias was evaluated via Egger's test and funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 47.3% (95% CI 33.5-61.3%), and the complete response (CR) rate was 22.0% (95% CI 16.7-27.7%). One-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 48.2% (95% CI 17.8-79.3%) and 31.2% (95% CI 9.2-58.9%), respectively, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. In the clinical trial subgroup, ORR and CR were 47.3% (95% CI 33.3-61.5%) and 23.9% (95% CI 21.9-26.1%), while 1-year OS and PFS were 43.8% (95% CI 25.2-63.3%) and 28.0% (95% CI 14.6-43.8%), respectively. No publication bias was detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98.7% of patients, with grade ≥ 3 events in 82.6%. Common hematologic AEs included anemia (47.7%; grade ≥ 3: 13.6%), leukopenia (16%, grade ≥ 3: 9.7%), neutropenia (32.9%; grade ≥ 3: 22.4%), and thrombocytopenia (24.3%; grade ≥ 3: 16.1%). Frequent non-hematologic AEs included fatigue (20%), fever (15.6%), vomiting (12.4%), and abdominal pain (11.4%). Other reported events included hypokalemia (25.5%), rash (20%), and peripheral edema (23.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in heavily pretreated R/R DLBCL, with an ORR of ~ 47% and manageable toxicity. These findings reinforce its role as a valuable treatment option in patients with limited alternatives and highlight the need for randomized studies to optimize patient selection and sequencing strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03216-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly for patients ineligible for stem-cell transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy. Loncastuximab tesirine, a CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated promising single-agent activity in recent studies and is approved in this setting. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until March 2025. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy with defined efficacy and safety endpoints were included. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including three clinical trials and four observational cohort studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Pooled analyses were conducted in R (version 4.5.1) using absolute risk and random-effects modeling. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic; publication bias was evaluated via Egger's test and funnel plots.

Results: The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 47.3% (95% CI 33.5-61.3%), and the complete response (CR) rate was 22.0% (95% CI 16.7-27.7%). One-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 48.2% (95% CI 17.8-79.3%) and 31.2% (95% CI 9.2-58.9%), respectively, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. In the clinical trial subgroup, ORR and CR were 47.3% (95% CI 33.3-61.5%) and 23.9% (95% CI 21.9-26.1%), while 1-year OS and PFS were 43.8% (95% CI 25.2-63.3%) and 28.0% (95% CI 14.6-43.8%), respectively. No publication bias was detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98.7% of patients, with grade ≥ 3 events in 82.6%. Common hematologic AEs included anemia (47.7%; grade ≥ 3: 13.6%), leukopenia (16%, grade ≥ 3: 9.7%), neutropenia (32.9%; grade ≥ 3: 22.4%), and thrombocytopenia (24.3%; grade ≥ 3: 16.1%). Frequent non-hematologic AEs included fatigue (20%), fever (15.6%), vomiting (12.4%), and abdominal pain (11.4%). Other reported events included hypokalemia (25.5%), rash (20%), and peripheral edema (23.7%).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in heavily pretreated R/R DLBCL, with an ORR of ~ 47% and manageable toxicity. These findings reinforce its role as a valuable treatment option in patients with limited alternatives and highlight the need for randomized studies to optimize patient selection and sequencing strategies.

loncastuximab tesirine治疗复发或难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)仍然是一个治疗挑战,特别是对于不适合干细胞移植或CAR - t细胞治疗的患者。Loncastuximab tesirine是一种cd19导向的抗体-药物偶联物,在最近的研究中显示出有希望的单药活性,并在这种情况下被批准。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估loncastuximab tesirine单药治疗R/R DLBCL患者的疗效和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价,检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL从成立到2025年3月。研究报告了loncastuximab tesirine单药治疗的临床结果,并确定了疗效和安全性终点。7项研究符合纳入标准,包括3项临床试验和4项观察性队列研究。两名审稿人独立提取数据。采用绝对风险和随机效应模型,在R(4.5.1版)中进行合并分析。采用I2统计量评估异质性;通过Egger检验和漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:合并总有效率(ORR)为47.3% (95% CI 33.5 ~ 61.3%),完全缓解率(CR)为22.0% (95% CI 16.7 ~ 27.7%)。1年总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为48.2% (95% CI 17.8-79.3%)和31.2% (95% CI 9.2-58.9%),研究间存在很大的异质性。在临床试验亚组中,ORR和CR分别为47.3% (95% CI 33.3-61.5%)和23.9% (95% CI 21.9-26.1%),而1年OS和PFS分别为43.8% (95% CI 25.2-63.3%)和28.0% (95% CI 14.6-43.8%)。未发现发表偏倚。治疗后出现的不良事件(ae)发生率为98.7%,≥3级事件发生率为82.6%。常见的血液学ae包括贫血(47.7%,分级≥3:13.6%)、白细胞减少(16%,分级≥3:9.7%)、中性粒细胞减少(32.9%,分级≥3:22.4%)和血小板减少(24.3%,分级≥3:16.1%)。常见的非血液学不良反应包括疲劳(20%)、发热(15.6%)、呕吐(12.4%)和腹痛(11.4%)。其他报告的事件包括低钾血症(25.5%)、皮疹(20%)和周围水肿(23.7%)。结论:本荟萃分析支持loncastuximab tesirine单药治疗重度预处理的R/R DLBCL的疗效,ORR约为47%,毒性可控。这些发现加强了其作为有限患者有价值的治疗选择的作用,并强调了随机研究优化患者选择和测序策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书