Air pollution and respiratory outcomes in COPD above and below current environmental protection agency standards.

IF 4.2 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Laura C Myers, Sahithi Chimmula, David Schlessinger, Kathleen A Daly, Crystal A Hsiao, Joel Schwartz, Stephen K Van Den Eeden, Stephen Sidney, Kamala Deosaransingh, Stacey Alexeeff
{"title":"Air pollution and respiratory outcomes in COPD above and below current environmental protection agency standards.","authors":"Laura C Myers, Sahithi Chimmula, David Schlessinger, Kathleen A Daly, Crystal A Hsiao, Joel Schwartz, Stephen K Van Den Eeden, Stephen Sidney, Kamala Deosaransingh, Stacey Alexeeff","doi":"10.1097/EE9.0000000000000491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rigorous studies are needed to defend the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards and prompt policymakers to acknowledge a dose-response relationship between air pollution and respiratory outcomes. In the most recent Environmental Protection Agency comprehensive review, scientists determined there was insufficient evidence to claim a causal relationship between chronic particulate matter air pollution (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and respiratory outcomes, despite acknowledging one for cardiovascular outcomes (Integrated Science Assessment, <i>Table 5-27</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the associations between chronic PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels and respiratory outcomes in 169,713 patients within Kaiser Permanente Northern California who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between 2007 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For every 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> rise in average yearly PM<sub>2.5</sub>, there was a statistically significant increase in relative risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 1.20), respiratory-related death (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.15, 1.30), COPD exacerbation (HR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.29, 1.41), and the combined endpoint of COPD exacerbation or respiratory-related hospitalization with any-cause death as competing risk (HR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.25, 1.35). We demonstrate a dose-response relationship between 1-year average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and respiratory outcomes for key regulatory categories of PM<sub>2.5</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings add rigorous evidence to support the continuation of the current annual PM<sub>2.5</sub> standard, which was lowered to 9 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in 2024. Our <i>novel contribution</i> is documenting the dose-response relationship between chronic PM<sub>2.5</sub> and multiple respiratory outcomes in a longitudinal cohort with patients followed for up to 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"10 3","pages":"e491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13232900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rigorous studies are needed to defend the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards and prompt policymakers to acknowledge a dose-response relationship between air pollution and respiratory outcomes. In the most recent Environmental Protection Agency comprehensive review, scientists determined there was insufficient evidence to claim a causal relationship between chronic particulate matter air pollution (PM2.5) and respiratory outcomes, despite acknowledging one for cardiovascular outcomes (Integrated Science Assessment, Table 5-27).

Methods: This study examined the associations between chronic PM2.5 levels and respiratory outcomes in 169,713 patients within Kaiser Permanente Northern California who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between 2007 and 2016.

Results: For every 10 μg/m3 rise in average yearly PM2.5, there was a statistically significant increase in relative risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 1.20), respiratory-related death (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.15, 1.30), COPD exacerbation (HR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.29, 1.41), and the combined endpoint of COPD exacerbation or respiratory-related hospitalization with any-cause death as competing risk (HR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.25, 1.35). We demonstrate a dose-response relationship between 1-year average PM2.5 exposure and respiratory outcomes for key regulatory categories of PM2.5.

Conclusions: These findings add rigorous evidence to support the continuation of the current annual PM2.5 standard, which was lowered to 9 μg/m3 in 2024. Our novel contribution is documenting the dose-response relationship between chronic PM2.5 and multiple respiratory outcomes in a longitudinal cohort with patients followed for up to 10 years.

慢性阻塞性肺病的空气污染和呼吸结果高于或低于目前的环境保护机构标准。
背景:需要严格的研究来捍卫当前的国家环境空气质量标准,并促使决策者承认空气污染与呼吸结果之间的剂量-反应关系。在美国环境保护局(Environmental Protection Agency)最近的一次综合评估中,科学家们认为,尽管承认心血管疾病与慢性颗粒物空气污染(PM2.5)和呼吸系统疾病之间存在因果关系,但没有足够的证据表明两者之间存在因果关系(综合科学评估,表5-27)。方法:本研究调查了2007年至2016年期间北加州凯撒医疗机构(Kaiser Permanente Northern California) 169713名慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的慢性PM2.5水平与呼吸结果之间的关系。结果:每10μg / m3年均PM2.5,有统计上显著的增加相对死亡风险(风险比[HR] = 1.15; 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.10, 1.20),呼吸相关死亡(HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.30),慢性阻塞性肺病恶化(HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.29, 1.41),和合并后的端点的COPD恶化或呼吸相关住院10年死亡竞争风险(HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.25, 1.35)。我们证明了1年平均PM2.5暴露与PM2.5关键调节类别的呼吸结果之间的剂量-反应关系。结论:这些发现为延续目前的PM2.5年度标准(2024年降至9 μg/m3)提供了有力的证据。我们的新贡献是在一项长达10年的纵向队列研究中记录了慢性PM2.5与多种呼吸结果之间的剂量-反应关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书