Diagnostic tests and headache misdiagnoses in individuals with resistant and refractory migraine - data from the REFINE study.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-04 DOI:10.1177/03331024261443712
Federico De Santis, Chiara Rosignoli, Agnese Onofri, Mark Braschinsky, Olga Sved, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Renato Oliveira, Christian Lampl, Jakob Paungarttner, Paolo Martelletti, William David Wells-Gatnik, Isabel Pavao Martins, Dimos D Mitsikostas, Loukia Apostolakopoulou, Aynur Ozge, Dilan Bayar Narin, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Albert Munoz-Vendrell, Maria Pia Prudenzano, Martino Gentile, Kristina Ryliskiene, Jurgita Vainauskiene, Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio, Fabrizio Vernieri, Gianmarco Iaccarino, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Sławomir Budrewicz, Marta Carnovali, Zaza Katsarava, Simona Sacco, Raffaele Ornello
{"title":"Diagnostic tests and headache misdiagnoses in individuals with resistant and refractory migraine - data from the REFINE study.","authors":"Federico De Santis, Chiara Rosignoli, Agnese Onofri, Mark Braschinsky, Olga Sved, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Renato Oliveira, Christian Lampl, Jakob Paungarttner, Paolo Martelletti, William David Wells-Gatnik, Isabel Pavao Martins, Dimos D Mitsikostas, Loukia Apostolakopoulou, Aynur Ozge, Dilan Bayar Narin, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Albert Munoz-Vendrell, Maria Pia Prudenzano, Martino Gentile, Kristina Ryliskiene, Jurgita Vainauskiene, Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio, Fabrizio Vernieri, Gianmarco Iaccarino, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Sławomir Budrewicz, Marta Carnovali, Zaza Katsarava, Simona Sacco, Raffaele Ornello","doi":"10.1177/03331024261443712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIndividuals with difficult-to-treat migraine, including resistant migraine (ResM) and refractory migraine (RefM), might experience treatment delays, undergo unnecessary diagnostic tests and receive misdiagnoses, which might influence treatment outcomes. For this reason, we hypothesized that individuals with ResM and RefM might report more diagnostic tests and misdiagnoses in their medical history compared with those with non-resistant/non-refractory migraine (NRNRM).MethodsThis analysis used baseline, cross-sectional data from the REFINE study, a multicenter, prospective observational study conducted in 15 European tertiary headache centers. Adults with episodic or chronic migraine were classified into RefM, ResM, or NRNRM groups. Baseline data were analyzed to assess the frequency of previous diagnostic tests and misdiagnoses.ResultsOverall, 689 participants were included with a median age of 46 years (interquartile range 36-53); 570 participants (82.7%) were female; 355 (51.5%) had NRNRM, 261 (37.9%) ResM, and 73 (10.9%) RefM. Referring to diagnostic tests, 335 participants (48.7%) had one and 237 (34.4%) multiple brain magnetic resonance imaging scans. ResM and RefM participants underwent more diagnostic tests than NRNRM. Overall, 193 participants (28.0%) had at least one prior headache misdiagnosis, most commonly cervical spine disorders and sinusitis; misdiagnoses were more frequent in NRNRM and ResM than in RefM (31.1%, 28.5%, and 15.1%, respectively; p = 0.025). Misdiagnosis rates were not influenced by age, sex, disease duration, or comorbidities.ConclusionsDiagnostic tests use and misdiagnoses are highly prevalent in all the three groups of individuals with ResM, RefM, and NRNRM with some differences across the three groups that may depend on multiple factors. Our findings emphasize a need for better diagnostic accuracy and care pathway across the entire spectrum of migraine, to avoid unnecessary diagnostic tests and misdiagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"46 6","pages":"3331024261443712"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261443712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIndividuals with difficult-to-treat migraine, including resistant migraine (ResM) and refractory migraine (RefM), might experience treatment delays, undergo unnecessary diagnostic tests and receive misdiagnoses, which might influence treatment outcomes. For this reason, we hypothesized that individuals with ResM and RefM might report more diagnostic tests and misdiagnoses in their medical history compared with those with non-resistant/non-refractory migraine (NRNRM).MethodsThis analysis used baseline, cross-sectional data from the REFINE study, a multicenter, prospective observational study conducted in 15 European tertiary headache centers. Adults with episodic or chronic migraine were classified into RefM, ResM, or NRNRM groups. Baseline data were analyzed to assess the frequency of previous diagnostic tests and misdiagnoses.ResultsOverall, 689 participants were included with a median age of 46 years (interquartile range 36-53); 570 participants (82.7%) were female; 355 (51.5%) had NRNRM, 261 (37.9%) ResM, and 73 (10.9%) RefM. Referring to diagnostic tests, 335 participants (48.7%) had one and 237 (34.4%) multiple brain magnetic resonance imaging scans. ResM and RefM participants underwent more diagnostic tests than NRNRM. Overall, 193 participants (28.0%) had at least one prior headache misdiagnosis, most commonly cervical spine disorders and sinusitis; misdiagnoses were more frequent in NRNRM and ResM than in RefM (31.1%, 28.5%, and 15.1%, respectively; p = 0.025). Misdiagnosis rates were not influenced by age, sex, disease duration, or comorbidities.ConclusionsDiagnostic tests use and misdiagnoses are highly prevalent in all the three groups of individuals with ResM, RefM, and NRNRM with some differences across the three groups that may depend on multiple factors. Our findings emphasize a need for better diagnostic accuracy and care pathway across the entire spectrum of migraine, to avoid unnecessary diagnostic tests and misdiagnoses.

难治性和难治性偏头痛患者的诊断测试和头痛误诊——来自REFINE研究的数据。
背景:难治性偏头痛(ResM)和难治性偏头痛(RefM)等难治性偏头痛患者可能会出现治疗延误、进行不必要的诊断测试和误诊,这可能会影响治疗结果。因此,我们假设与非耐药/非难治性偏头痛(NRNRM)患者相比,ResM和RefM患者在其病史中可能报告更多的诊断测试和误诊。方法:本分析使用来自REFINE研究的基线横断面数据,该研究是一项在15个欧洲三级头痛中心进行的多中心前瞻性观察性研究。患有发作性或慢性偏头痛的成年人被分为RefM、ResM或NRNRM组。对基线数据进行分析,以评估既往诊断试验和误诊的频率。结果共纳入689名参与者,中位年龄为46岁(四分位数范围36-53岁);570名参与者(82.7%)为女性;NRNRM 355例(51.5%),ResM 261例(37.9%),RefM 73例(10.9%)。在诊断测试中,335名参与者(48.7%)进行了一次脑磁共振成像扫描,237名(34.4%)进行了多次脑磁共振成像扫描。ResM和RefM参与者比NRNRM进行了更多的诊断测试。总体而言,193名参与者(28.0%)至少有一次头痛误诊,最常见的是颈椎疾病和鼻窦炎;NRNRM和ResM的误诊率高于RefM(分别为31.1%、28.5%和15.1%,p = 0.025)。误诊率不受年龄、性别、病程或合并症的影响。结论ResM、RefM和NRNRM三组患者的诊断试验使用和误诊率均较高,且三组之间存在差异,这可能与多种因素有关。我们的研究结果强调需要更好的诊断准确性和整个偏头痛的护理途径,以避免不必要的诊断测试和误诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书