Feasibility of a field-based submaximal stair ascent test for estimating aerobic capacity and lower-limb strength in middle-aged and older adults

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Matti Hyvärinen, Niina Kajan, Eeva Kettunen, Ari Lehtiö, Jouni Kallio, Keegan Knittle, Neil Cronin, Laura Karavirta
{"title":"Feasibility of a field-based submaximal stair ascent test for estimating aerobic capacity and lower-limb strength in middle-aged and older adults","authors":"Matti Hyvärinen,&nbsp;Niina Kajan,&nbsp;Eeva Kettunen,&nbsp;Ari Lehtiö,&nbsp;Jouni Kallio,&nbsp;Keegan Knittle,&nbsp;Neil Cronin,&nbsp;Laura Karavirta","doi":"10.1111/cpf.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Assessing functional capacity is a key aspect of exercise testing and offers important insights into health in adult populations. However, accurate assessment often requires laboratory-based maximal tests. This pilot study investigated whether a field-based self-paced submaximal stair ascent test could feasibly assess aerobic capacity and lower-limb strength in middle-aged and older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight participants (20 women, 8 men) aged 40 to 70 years completed maximal treadmill and isometric leg press tests to assess maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>max) and lower-limb strength, respectively. Participants also performed two separate self-paced stair ascents of four and six flights. Ascent time, mean vertical power, as well as rate of perceived exertion, absolute heart rate, and relative heart rate following the test were recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ascent time and mean vertical power were associated with VO<sub>2</sub>max and lower-limb strength, with standardized regression coefficients ranging from −0.61 to −0.27 and from 0.41 to 0.73, respectively. However, these associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after controlling for age and sex. Predictive models based on the two best-performing stair ascent predictors selected by LASSO regression showed weak-to-moderate ability to predict VO<sub>2</sub>max (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.21–0.52) with cross-validated model performance significantly different from zero. In contrast, the models did not significantly predict lower-limb strength.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These preliminary findings suggest that a brief self-paced stair ascent test may offer a feasible field-based approach for estimating aerobic capacity in middle-aged and older adults. However, its predictive accuracy appears limited and should be further examined in larger samples.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cpf.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessing functional capacity is a key aspect of exercise testing and offers important insights into health in adult populations. However, accurate assessment often requires laboratory-based maximal tests. This pilot study investigated whether a field-based self-paced submaximal stair ascent test could feasibly assess aerobic capacity and lower-limb strength in middle-aged and older adults.

Methods

Twenty-eight participants (20 women, 8 men) aged 40 to 70 years completed maximal treadmill and isometric leg press tests to assess maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and lower-limb strength, respectively. Participants also performed two separate self-paced stair ascents of four and six flights. Ascent time, mean vertical power, as well as rate of perceived exertion, absolute heart rate, and relative heart rate following the test were recorded.

Results

Ascent time and mean vertical power were associated with VO2max and lower-limb strength, with standardized regression coefficients ranging from −0.61 to −0.27 and from 0.41 to 0.73, respectively. However, these associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after controlling for age and sex. Predictive models based on the two best-performing stair ascent predictors selected by LASSO regression showed weak-to-moderate ability to predict VO2max (R2 = 0.21–0.52) with cross-validated model performance significantly different from zero. In contrast, the models did not significantly predict lower-limb strength.

Conclusions

These preliminary findings suggest that a brief self-paced stair ascent test may offer a feasible field-based approach for estimating aerobic capacity in middle-aged and older adults. However, its predictive accuracy appears limited and should be further examined in larger samples.

基于现场的次最大楼梯上升测试的可行性,以评估中老年人的有氧能力和下肢力量。
背景:评估功能能力是运动测试的一个关键方面,为了解成年人的健康状况提供了重要的见解。然而,准确的评估往往需要基于实验室的最大测试。这项初步研究调查了基于现场的自定节奏次最大楼梯上升测试是否可以评估中老年人的有氧能力和下肢力量。方法:28名参与者(20名女性,8名男性),年龄在40至70岁之间,分别完成了最大跑步机和等长腿压试验,以评估最大耗氧量(VO2max)和下肢力量。参与者还分别进行了四层和六层楼梯的自主攀爬。记录上升时间、平均垂直力、感觉用力率、绝对心率和相对心率。结果:上坡时间和平均垂直力量与VO2max和下肢力量相关,标准化回归系数分别为-0.61 ~ -0.27和0.41 ~ 0.73。然而,在控制年龄和性别后,这些关联减弱,不再具有统计学意义。基于LASSO回归选择的两个最佳楼梯上升预测因子的预测模型显示出弱至中等的VO2max预测能力(R2 = 0.21-0.52),交叉验证的模型性能与零有显著差异。相比之下,这些模型并不能显著预测下肢力量。结论:这些初步发现表明,一个简短的自定节奏楼梯上升测试可能为估计中老年人的有氧能力提供一种可行的基于现场的方法。然而,它的预测准确性似乎有限,应该在更大的样本中进一步检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书