The Politics of Passage: Studying Checkpoints and Claim Making in Conflict-affected Settings

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Development and Change Pub Date : 2026-06-04 Epub Date: 2026-05-06 DOI:10.1111/dech.70067
Peer Schouten, Vanessa van den Boogaard, Max Gallien, Shalaka Thakur, Florian Weigand
{"title":"The Politics of Passage: Studying Checkpoints and Claim Making in Conflict-affected Settings","authors":"Peer Schouten,&nbsp;Vanessa van den Boogaard,&nbsp;Max Gallien,&nbsp;Shalaka Thakur,&nbsp;Florian Weigand","doi":"10.1111/dech.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roadblocks, or checkpoints, are obligatory passage points that are erected by entities claiming authority over a given crossing. They are often the most common everyday interface between civilians and armed actors in conflict-affected contexts, but are overlooked in studies on either trade or authority amidst conflict. This article, which introduces a special issue on the topic, argues that roadblocks are a useful empirical entry point to questions regarding the practical, political and theoretical interplay of economic circulation and political contestation. It proposes the framework of ‘the politics of passage’, which focuses on the entangled struggles over movement and authority arising from the interaction of a claim to the right of passage and claims to power over it. Through this politics of passage a range of broader social, political and economic claims are made and contested. Within this framework, checkpoints are a privileged field site and useful heuristic device to understand the relationship between trade, conflict and authority in contexts of contested statehood. Roadblocks function as critical nodes where otherwise implicit claims by states and non-state actors are made explicit in the encounter — or confrontation — between people, capital and goods on the move, and those who claim authority over them. Understanding the nature of these claims, and what shapes the types of claim making that emerge in different contexts, is a central contribution of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"57 3","pages":"421-440"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.70067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roadblocks, or checkpoints, are obligatory passage points that are erected by entities claiming authority over a given crossing. They are often the most common everyday interface between civilians and armed actors in conflict-affected contexts, but are overlooked in studies on either trade or authority amidst conflict. This article, which introduces a special issue on the topic, argues that roadblocks are a useful empirical entry point to questions regarding the practical, political and theoretical interplay of economic circulation and political contestation. It proposes the framework of ‘the politics of passage’, which focuses on the entangled struggles over movement and authority arising from the interaction of a claim to the right of passage and claims to power over it. Through this politics of passage a range of broader social, political and economic claims are made and contested. Within this framework, checkpoints are a privileged field site and useful heuristic device to understand the relationship between trade, conflict and authority in contexts of contested statehood. Roadblocks function as critical nodes where otherwise implicit claims by states and non-state actors are made explicit in the encounter — or confrontation — between people, capital and goods on the move, and those who claim authority over them. Understanding the nature of these claims, and what shapes the types of claim making that emerge in different contexts, is a central contribution of this article.

通道的政治:在受冲突影响的环境中研究检查点和索赔
路障或检查站是由声称对某一过境点拥有权力的实体设立的强制性通行点。在受冲突影响的环境中,它们往往是平民和武装行为者之间最常见的日常接口,但在关于冲突中的贸易或权威的研究中却被忽视了。本文介绍了关于这一主题的一个特别问题,认为路障是一个有用的经验切入点,可以解决有关经济流通和政治争论的实际、政治和理论相互作用的问题。它提出了“通行政治”的框架,该框架关注的是由于对通行权的要求和对通行权的要求的相互作用而产生的关于运动和权威的纠缠斗争。通过这种政治通道,一系列更广泛的社会、政治和经济主张被提出和争论。在这个框架内,检查点是一个有特权的实地地点,也是理解有争议国家背景下贸易、冲突和权威之间关系的有用启发式工具。路障起到关键节点的作用,在这些节点上,国家和非国家行为体在流动中的人员、资本和货物与声称对其拥有权力的人之间的相遇或对抗中,明确表达了其隐含的主张。理解这些主张的本质,以及是什么塑造了在不同背景下出现的主张类型,是本文的核心贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书