Partial Verifiability Induced Contests and Inefficient Policy-Making

IF 2.2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2026-06-04 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.70031
Octavian Strîmbu
{"title":"Partial Verifiability Induced Contests and Inefficient Policy-Making","authors":"Octavian Strîmbu","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>First-price menu auctions (i.e., common agency) and all-pay auctions are two of the main tools used to formalize and understand political behavior. In this paper, I propose a common agency model in which the interest groups are only able to partially verify and condition the transfers. This model turns out to be a form of all-pay contest, since the interest groups play using mixed strategies. Surprisingly, an interest group equipped with better verification technology may actually bid less. Since the probability of winning is not always monotonic with respect to a verification technology, social welfare may decrease even as verification technologies improve. I argue that this is due both to the official's incentive constraint and to the flexibility of the interest groups' incentive schemes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":"38 2","pages":"438-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

First-price menu auctions (i.e., common agency) and all-pay auctions are two of the main tools used to formalize and understand political behavior. In this paper, I propose a common agency model in which the interest groups are only able to partially verify and condition the transfers. This model turns out to be a form of all-pay contest, since the interest groups play using mixed strategies. Surprisingly, an interest group equipped with better verification technology may actually bid less. Since the probability of winning is not always monotonic with respect to a verification technology, social welfare may decrease even as verification technologies improve. I argue that this is due both to the official's incentive constraint and to the flexibility of the interest groups' incentive schemes.

部分可验证性导致了竞争和低效的决策
首价菜单拍卖(即共同代理)和全付拍卖是用于形式化和理解政治行为的两种主要工具。在本文中,我提出了一个共同的代理模型,其中利益集团只能部分地验证和约束转移。这种模式被证明是一种全酬竞争,因为利益集团使用混合策略。令人惊讶的是,拥有更好验证技术的利益集团实际上可能出价更低。由于就验证技术而言,获胜的概率并不总是单调的,因此即使验证技术得到改进,社会福利也可能减少。我认为,这既是由于官员的激励约束,也是由于利益集团激励机制的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书