Cefazolin as an alternative in patients with a history of penicillin or β-lactam antibiotic allergy: A case overview.

IF 5.1
Allergologie select Pub Date : 2026-05-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5414/ALX02634E
Burkhard Kreft, Johannes Wohlrab, Cord Sunderkötter
{"title":"Cefazolin as an alternative in patients with a history of penicillin or β-lactam antibiotic allergy: A case overview.","authors":"Burkhard Kreft, Johannes Wohlrab, Cord Sunderkötter","doi":"10.5414/ALX02634E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many patients with suspected or confirmed allergy to penicillin or β-lactam antibiotics are unnecessarily denied all β-lactam antibiotics (BLA) and instead given a less effective antibiotic with more side effects. However, cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is a safe and effective treatment option for these patients in most cases. Recent studies show that immunological cross-reactions among BLAs are primarily caused by structural similarities in the side chains and not by the common β-lactam ring. Cefazolin has unique R1 and R2 side chains that largely rule out cross-reactivity with other BLAs. In a case series, 21 patients with a history of alleged or confirmed allergy to BLAs were exposed to cefazolin under real-life conditions, and all but 1 patient (who developed an uncomplicated maculopapular rash) showed no reaction. Therefore, the use of cefazolin is acceptable under clinical supervision in cases of a previous uncomplicated delayed-type reaction. However, in cases of reported or documented clinical reactions to BLA that are indicative of a type I allergy (such as urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis), prior to (titrated) administration of cefazolin under appropriate monitoring measures, a diagnostic evaluation in accordance with guidelines, including a negative skin test for cefazolin, is advisable. This procedure avoids the use of less suitable reserve antibiotics and ensures effective treatment without incalculable risk for anaphylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":101298,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie select","volume":"10 ","pages":"101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13227573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02634E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many patients with suspected or confirmed allergy to penicillin or β-lactam antibiotics are unnecessarily denied all β-lactam antibiotics (BLA) and instead given a less effective antibiotic with more side effects. However, cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is a safe and effective treatment option for these patients in most cases. Recent studies show that immunological cross-reactions among BLAs are primarily caused by structural similarities in the side chains and not by the common β-lactam ring. Cefazolin has unique R1 and R2 side chains that largely rule out cross-reactivity with other BLAs. In a case series, 21 patients with a history of alleged or confirmed allergy to BLAs were exposed to cefazolin under real-life conditions, and all but 1 patient (who developed an uncomplicated maculopapular rash) showed no reaction. Therefore, the use of cefazolin is acceptable under clinical supervision in cases of a previous uncomplicated delayed-type reaction. However, in cases of reported or documented clinical reactions to BLA that are indicative of a type I allergy (such as urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis), prior to (titrated) administration of cefazolin under appropriate monitoring measures, a diagnostic evaluation in accordance with guidelines, including a negative skin test for cefazolin, is advisable. This procedure avoids the use of less suitable reserve antibiotics and ensures effective treatment without incalculable risk for anaphylaxis.

头孢唑林作为青霉素或β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏史患者的替代药物:一例综述。
许多疑似或确诊对青霉素或β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏的患者被不必要地拒绝使用所有β-内酰胺类抗生素(BLA),转而使用效果较差且副作用更大的抗生素。然而,在大多数情况下,第一代头孢菌素头孢唑林对这些患者是一种安全有效的治疗选择。最近的研究表明,bla之间的免疫交叉反应主要是由于侧链结构的相似性,而不是由共同的β-内酰胺环引起的。头孢唑林具有独特的R1和R2侧链,这在很大程度上排除了与其他bla的交叉反应性。在一个病例系列中,21例声称或证实对bla过敏的患者在现实生活条件下暴露于头孢唑林,除1例患者(出现无并发症的黄斑丘疹)外,其余患者均未出现反应。因此,在临床监督下,对于既往无并发症的迟发性反应的病例,使用头孢唑林是可以接受的。然而,在报告或记录的BLA临床反应表明I型过敏(如荨麻疹、血管性水肿、过敏反应)的情况下,在适当的监测措施下(滴定)给药头孢唑林之前,建议根据指南进行诊断评估,包括头孢唑林皮肤试验阴性。该程序避免了使用不太合适的储备抗生素,并确保有效治疗,没有不可估量的过敏反应风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书