Evaluation of antimicrobial orders with expanded indication for use.

Michael Carlone, Jill Wesolowski, Samantha Loutzenheiser, Chanda Mullen, Steven Gordon, Thomas Fraser, Andrea M Pallotta
{"title":"Evaluation of antimicrobial orders with expanded indication for use.","authors":"Michael Carlone, Jill Wesolowski, Samantha Loutzenheiser, Chanda Mullen, Steven Gordon, Thomas Fraser, Andrea M Pallotta","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of requiring infectious source selection on systemic antimicrobial orders for stewardship tracking.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Multicenter, health system quality improvement project across 17 hospitals and 21 emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All inpatient and ED antimicrobial orders with an indication between September 1 and September 30, 2024 were analyzed. Primary outcome: Prevalence of selected infectious sources. Secondary outcomes: indication frequency, free-text use, and concordance between selected and documented sources in 500 random orders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 57,118 orders, empiric indication was most common (71%). Top sources: respiratory (23%), urinary/renal (19%), skin/soft tissue (16%). Concordance was 95%. Free-text entries (2.6%) often matched existing options; dental/oral emerged as a new category.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infectious source selection was evaluated and supports future targeted stewardship interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13227120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of requiring infectious source selection on systemic antimicrobial orders for stewardship tracking.

Design and setting: Multicenter, health system quality improvement project across 17 hospitals and 21 emergency departments.

Methods: All inpatient and ED antimicrobial orders with an indication between September 1 and September 30, 2024 were analyzed. Primary outcome: Prevalence of selected infectious sources. Secondary outcomes: indication frequency, free-text use, and concordance between selected and documented sources in 500 random orders.

Results: Among 57,118 orders, empiric indication was most common (71%). Top sources: respiratory (23%), urinary/renal (19%), skin/soft tissue (16%). Concordance was 95%. Free-text entries (2.6%) often matched existing options; dental/oral emerged as a new category.

Conclusion: Infectious source selection was evaluated and supports future targeted stewardship interventions.

扩大使用指征的抗菌药物订单的评价。
目的:评价要求传染源选择对系统抗菌药物订单管理跟踪的影响。设计和设置:17家医院和21个急诊科的多中心卫生系统质量改进项目。方法:对我院2024年9月1日至9月30日住院及急诊科有指征的抗菌药物订单进行分析。主要结局:选定传染源的流行情况。次要结果:指征频率,自由文本的使用,以及在500个随机顺序中选择和记录的来源之间的一致性。结果:57,118份医嘱中,经验性指征最为常见(71%)。主要来源:呼吸道(23%)、泌尿/肾脏(19%)、皮肤/软组织(16%)。一致性为95%。自由文本条目(2.6%)通常与现有选项匹配;牙科/口腔作为一个新类别出现。结论:对传染源选择进行了评估,并为未来有针对性的管理干预提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书