Michael Carlone, Jill Wesolowski, Samantha Loutzenheiser, Chanda Mullen, Steven Gordon, Thomas Fraser, Andrea M Pallotta
{"title":"Evaluation of antimicrobial orders with expanded indication for use.","authors":"Michael Carlone, Jill Wesolowski, Samantha Loutzenheiser, Chanda Mullen, Steven Gordon, Thomas Fraser, Andrea M Pallotta","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of requiring infectious source selection on systemic antimicrobial orders for stewardship tracking.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Multicenter, health system quality improvement project across 17 hospitals and 21 emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All inpatient and ED antimicrobial orders with an indication between September 1 and September 30, 2024 were analyzed. Primary outcome: Prevalence of selected infectious sources. Secondary outcomes: indication frequency, free-text use, and concordance between selected and documented sources in 500 random orders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 57,118 orders, empiric indication was most common (71%). Top sources: respiratory (23%), urinary/renal (19%), skin/soft tissue (16%). Concordance was 95%. Free-text entries (2.6%) often matched existing options; dental/oral emerged as a new category.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infectious source selection was evaluated and supports future targeted stewardship interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13227120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of requiring infectious source selection on systemic antimicrobial orders for stewardship tracking.
Design and setting: Multicenter, health system quality improvement project across 17 hospitals and 21 emergency departments.
Methods: All inpatient and ED antimicrobial orders with an indication between September 1 and September 30, 2024 were analyzed. Primary outcome: Prevalence of selected infectious sources. Secondary outcomes: indication frequency, free-text use, and concordance between selected and documented sources in 500 random orders.
Results: Among 57,118 orders, empiric indication was most common (71%). Top sources: respiratory (23%), urinary/renal (19%), skin/soft tissue (16%). Concordance was 95%. Free-text entries (2.6%) often matched existing options; dental/oral emerged as a new category.
Conclusion: Infectious source selection was evaluated and supports future targeted stewardship interventions.