An Analysis of Thyrotropin Levels in Patients With Nonscarring Alopecia: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Simona A Alomary, Nicole J Baker, Nicholas Schell, Temitayo Ogunleye, Susan Taylor, Heather Milbar
{"title":"An Analysis of Thyrotropin Levels in Patients With Nonscarring Alopecia: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Simona A Alomary, Nicole J Baker, Nicholas Schell, Temitayo Ogunleye, Susan Taylor, Heather Milbar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare thyrotropin (TSH) levels across nonscarring alopecia (NSA) subtypes-alopecia areata (AA), telogen effluvium (TE), and androgenetic alopecia (AGA)-in a primary analysis of all patients, a secondary analysis of euthyroid patients stratified into low-normal (0.5-2.5 mIU/L) and high-normal (2.5-4.5 mIU/L) categories, and a tertiary analysis of patients with thyroid dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with AA, TE, or AGA at a single academic dermatology department between August 2017 and August 2024. TSH values were drawn within 3 months of the initial visit, and patient demographics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Patients with thyroid dysfunction were excluded from the secondary analysis. TSH values within the euthyroid range were stratified into low-normal and high-normal categories. A tertiary analysis of patients with frank thyroid dysfunction was later conducted. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,411 patients initially identified, most TSH values were within the euthyroid range. In a secondary analysis of 1,291 euthyroid patients, there was no significant difference in TSH distribution across NSA subtypes, including when stratified into low-normal vs high-normal categories. Among patients with thyroid dysfunction (8.5%), those with TE had the highest relative proportions of both hypothyroidism (5.0%) and hyperthyroidism (5.5%). Black or African American patients with AA and TE had lower mean TSH levels than White patients; however, this was not observed in AGA.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations of this study include the retrospective design and the potential for incomplete or biased medical records.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TSH levels among patients with NSA did not vary significantly based on NSA subtype. Racial differences in mean TSH were observed in AA and TE, but the clinical significance remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"19 4","pages":"35-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13229151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare thyrotropin (TSH) levels across nonscarring alopecia (NSA) subtypes-alopecia areata (AA), telogen effluvium (TE), and androgenetic alopecia (AGA)-in a primary analysis of all patients, a secondary analysis of euthyroid patients stratified into low-normal (0.5-2.5 mIU/L) and high-normal (2.5-4.5 mIU/L) categories, and a tertiary analysis of patients with thyroid dysfunction.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with AA, TE, or AGA at a single academic dermatology department between August 2017 and August 2024. TSH values were drawn within 3 months of the initial visit, and patient demographics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Patients with thyroid dysfunction were excluded from the secondary analysis. TSH values within the euthyroid range were stratified into low-normal and high-normal categories. A tertiary analysis of patients with frank thyroid dysfunction was later conducted. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were performed.

Results: Among the 1,411 patients initially identified, most TSH values were within the euthyroid range. In a secondary analysis of 1,291 euthyroid patients, there was no significant difference in TSH distribution across NSA subtypes, including when stratified into low-normal vs high-normal categories. Among patients with thyroid dysfunction (8.5%), those with TE had the highest relative proportions of both hypothyroidism (5.0%) and hyperthyroidism (5.5%). Black or African American patients with AA and TE had lower mean TSH levels than White patients; however, this was not observed in AGA.

Limitations: Limitations of this study include the retrospective design and the potential for incomplete or biased medical records.

Conclusion: TSH levels among patients with NSA did not vary significantly based on NSA subtype. Racial differences in mean TSH were observed in AA and TE, but the clinical significance remains uncertain.

非瘢痕性脱发患者促甲状腺激素水平分析:一项单中心回顾性比较研究。
目的:比较非瘢痕性脱发(NSA)亚型(斑秃(AA)、休真期脱发(TE)和雄激素性脱发(AGA))患者的促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平,对所有患者进行初级分析,对甲状腺功能正常的患者进行二级分析,分为低正常(0.5-2.5 mIU/L)和高正常(2.5-4.5 mIU/L)类别,对甲状腺功能障碍患者进行三级分析。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2024年8月在单一学术皮肤科诊断为AA、TE或AGA的患者。在首次就诊后3个月内绘制TSH值,并从电子病历中提取患者人口统计数据。有甲状腺功能障碍的患者被排除在二次分析之外。甲状腺功能正常范围内的TSH值分为低正常和高正常两类。随后对甲状腺功能障碍患者进行了第三次分析。采用描述性统计、Kruskal-Wallis检验和bonferroni校正两两比较。结果:在最初确定的1411例患者中,大多数TSH值在甲状腺功能正常的范围内。在对1291名甲状腺功能正常患者的二次分析中,TSH分布在NSA亚型之间没有显著差异,包括将其分层为低正常与高正常类别。在甲状腺功能障碍患者(8.5%)中,TE患者甲状腺功能减退(5.0%)和甲状腺功能亢进(5.5%)的相对比例最高。黑人或非裔美国人AA和TE患者的平均TSH水平低于白人患者;然而,在AGA中没有观察到这一点。局限性:本研究的局限性包括回顾性设计和可能存在不完整或有偏见的医疗记录。结论:不同亚型NSA患者TSH水平差异不显著。在AA和TE中观察到平均TSH的种族差异,但临床意义尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书