The impact of integrated care on quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with frailty: A systematic review and mixed method synthesis.

IF 3.2 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Frailty & Aging Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.tjfa.2026.100150
Joanne Boyce, Declan Patton, Chanel Watson, Tom O'Connor, Zena Moore, Linda Nugent
{"title":"The impact of integrated care on quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with frailty: A systematic review and mixed method synthesis.","authors":"Joanne Boyce, Declan Patton, Chanel Watson, Tom O'Connor, Zena Moore, Linda Nugent","doi":"10.1016/j.tjfa.2026.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty among older adults is an escalating public health challenge, often associated with poorer quality of life (QoL) and increased pressure on healthcare systems. Integrated care is proposed as a strategy to meet the complex needs of this population, though evidence of its effectiveness remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of integrated care on the quality of life of frail, community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and mixed-methods synthesis, including meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based healthcare systems across six international studies.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 5498 frail, community-dwelling older adults across six studies: four randomised controlled trials and two quasi-experimental designs.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Integrated care interventions tailored to frailty, including person-centred, multidisciplinary, and value-based models.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Quality of Life was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included social functioning and healthcare costs. Standardised tools such as SF-12, SF-36, ICECAP-O, and EQ-5D were used across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed a small, non-significant improvement in QoL (SMD = 0.13, 95 % CI: -0.09 to 0.35, p = 0.24) with high heterogeneity (I² = 91 %). Tailored, multidimensional models showed greater effects, particularly in preserving social functioning. Findings on cost-effectiveness were inconsistent; some studies reported reduced hospital use, while others found increased primary care visits without cost savings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>. Integrated care may support social functioning but does not demonstrate a consistent improvement in overall QoL. Future trials should standardise QoL measurement, report intervention components clearly, include economic evaluations, and assess longer-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"15 3","pages":"100150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13254956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2026.100150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty among older adults is an escalating public health challenge, often associated with poorer quality of life (QoL) and increased pressure on healthcare systems. Integrated care is proposed as a strategy to meet the complex needs of this population, though evidence of its effectiveness remains inconclusive.

Objectives: To determine the impact of integrated care on the quality of life of frail, community-dwelling older adults.

Design: Systematic review and mixed-methods synthesis, including meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

Setting: Community-based healthcare systems across six international studies.

Participants: A total of 5498 frail, community-dwelling older adults across six studies: four randomised controlled trials and two quasi-experimental designs.

Intervention: Integrated care interventions tailored to frailty, including person-centred, multidisciplinary, and value-based models.

Measurements: Quality of Life was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included social functioning and healthcare costs. Standardised tools such as SF-12, SF-36, ICECAP-O, and EQ-5D were used across studies.

Results: The meta-analysis showed a small, non-significant improvement in QoL (SMD = 0.13, 95 % CI: -0.09 to 0.35, p = 0.24) with high heterogeneity (I² = 91 %). Tailored, multidimensional models showed greater effects, particularly in preserving social functioning. Findings on cost-effectiveness were inconsistent; some studies reported reduced hospital use, while others found increased primary care visits without cost savings.

Conclusions: . Integrated care may support social functioning but does not demonstrate a consistent improvement in overall QoL. Future trials should standardise QoL measurement, report intervention components clearly, include economic evaluations, and assess longer-term outcomes.

综合护理对社区居住的虚弱老年人生活质量的影响:一项系统回顾和混合方法综合。
背景:老年人的身体虚弱是一个不断升级的公共卫生挑战,通常与较差的生活质量(QoL)和对医疗保健系统的压力增加有关。综合护理被提议作为一种战略,以满足这一人群的复杂需求,尽管其有效性的证据仍然没有定论。目的:确定综合护理对社区居住的体弱老年人生活质量的影响。设计:系统回顾和混合方法综合,包括元分析和叙事综合。环境:基于社区的医疗保健系统跨越六个国际研究。参与者:六项研究共5498名体弱的社区老年人:四项随机对照试验和两项准实验设计。干预措施:针对弱者的综合护理干预措施,包括以人为本、多学科和基于价值的模式。测量:生活质量是主要结果。次要结果包括社会功能和医疗费用。标准化工具如SF-12、SF-36、ICECAP-O和EQ-5D在研究中使用。结果:荟萃分析显示,生活质量有小的、不显著的改善(SMD = 0.13, 95% CI: -0.09 ~ 0.35, p = 0.24),异质性高(I²= 91%)。量身定制的多维模型显示出更大的效果,特别是在保持社会功能方面。关于成本效益的调查结果不一致;一些研究报告说,医院的使用减少了,而另一些研究发现,初级保健就诊增加了,但没有节省费用。结论:。综合护理可能支持社会功能,但并未显示总体生活质量的持续改善。未来的试验应标准化生活质量测量,明确报告干预成分,包括经济评估,并评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书