Motion sickness induced by periodic accelerations: Effects of motion axis, frequency, and acceleration magnitude.

IF 1.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Jan L Souman, Jelte E Bos, Cyriel Diels, Suzanne A E Nooij
{"title":"Motion sickness induced by periodic accelerations: Effects of motion axis, frequency, and acceleration magnitude.","authors":"Jan L Souman, Jelte E Bos, Cyriel Diels, Suzanne A E Nooij","doi":"10.1177/09574271261446596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCarsickness is a potential barrier to the acceptance of automated driving as it turns drivers into passengers, thus making them more susceptible to motion sickness. However, most of our current knowledge of how vehicle motion causes motion sickness comes from seasickness studies, using vertical motion only. Some more recent studies have investigated the relationship between horizontal accelerations and motion sickness, but with inconsistent methodology and sometimes conflicting results.ObjectiveTo quantify the effects of acceleration frequency and magnitude for periodic accelerations along the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical axes in a large sample of participants, using consistent methodology throughout.MethodsIn three separate experiments, in total 107 participants were exposed to sinusoidal accelerations along either the longitudinal, lateral or vertical axis with different combinations of motion frequency and peak acceleration. Motion frequency was varied between 0.03 and 3.2 Hz, with peak acceleration ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 m/s<sup>2</sup>. Motion sickness was measured during motion exposure using the Motion Illness Symptoms Classification (MISC) scale, while the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and a visual analogue Discomfort scale were administered after each motion exposure.ResultsMotion sickness severity due to motion exposure was similar for the three motion axes. All three outcome measures showed a clear motion frequency dependency, with motion sickness in general most severe for frequencies around 0.2 Hz. However, significant motion sickness symptoms were observed for the entire frequency range tested. The frequency dependency was less clear for lateral motion than for longitudinal and vertical motion. Higher accelerations led to more severe motion sickness, with the rate of increase decreasing when accelerations became higher.ConclusionsOur results show that motion sickness due to periodic linear accelerations occurs along all three cardinal axes and that it depends on motion frequency. This frequency dependency was less clear for lateral motion than for longitudinal and vertical motion. Our results have important implications for both predictive models of motion sickness as well as for applications in automated vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"9574271261446596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271261446596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCarsickness is a potential barrier to the acceptance of automated driving as it turns drivers into passengers, thus making them more susceptible to motion sickness. However, most of our current knowledge of how vehicle motion causes motion sickness comes from seasickness studies, using vertical motion only. Some more recent studies have investigated the relationship between horizontal accelerations and motion sickness, but with inconsistent methodology and sometimes conflicting results.ObjectiveTo quantify the effects of acceleration frequency and magnitude for periodic accelerations along the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical axes in a large sample of participants, using consistent methodology throughout.MethodsIn three separate experiments, in total 107 participants were exposed to sinusoidal accelerations along either the longitudinal, lateral or vertical axis with different combinations of motion frequency and peak acceleration. Motion frequency was varied between 0.03 and 3.2 Hz, with peak acceleration ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 m/s2. Motion sickness was measured during motion exposure using the Motion Illness Symptoms Classification (MISC) scale, while the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and a visual analogue Discomfort scale were administered after each motion exposure.ResultsMotion sickness severity due to motion exposure was similar for the three motion axes. All three outcome measures showed a clear motion frequency dependency, with motion sickness in general most severe for frequencies around 0.2 Hz. However, significant motion sickness symptoms were observed for the entire frequency range tested. The frequency dependency was less clear for lateral motion than for longitudinal and vertical motion. Higher accelerations led to more severe motion sickness, with the rate of increase decreasing when accelerations became higher.ConclusionsOur results show that motion sickness due to periodic linear accelerations occurs along all three cardinal axes and that it depends on motion frequency. This frequency dependency was less clear for lateral motion than for longitudinal and vertical motion. Our results have important implications for both predictive models of motion sickness as well as for applications in automated vehicles.

周期性加速引起的晕动病:运动轴、频率和加速度大小的影响。
晕车是人们接受自动驾驶的一个潜在障碍,因为它把司机变成了乘客,从而使他们更容易晕车。然而,我们目前对车辆运动如何导致晕动病的大部分知识来自于晕船研究,只使用垂直运动。最近的一些研究调查了水平加速度和晕动病之间的关系,但方法不一致,有时结果也相互矛盾。目的在大量参与者样本中,采用一致的方法,量化加速频率和幅度对纵向、横向和垂直轴周期性加速度的影响。方法在三个独立的实验中,共有107名参与者暴露在纵向、横向或垂直方向的正弦加速度下,运动频率和峰值加速度的不同组合。运动频率在0.03 ~ 3.2 Hz之间,峰值加速度在0.5 ~ 4.0 m/s2之间。在运动暴露过程中使用运动疾病症状分类(MISC)量表测量晕动病,而每次运动暴露后使用模拟病问卷(SSQ)和视觉模拟不适量表。结果三个运动轴的运动暴露引起的晕动病严重程度相似。所有三个结果测量都显示出明显的运动频率依赖性,通常在0.2 Hz左右的频率下,晕动病最严重。然而,在整个测试频率范围内观察到明显的晕动病症状。与纵向和垂直运动相比,横向运动的频率依赖性不太明显。更高的加速度会导致更严重的晕动病,随着加速度的增加,晕动病的增加率会下降。结论周期性线性加速引起的晕动病在三个基本轴上均有发生,且与运动频率有关。这种频率依赖性在横向运动中不如纵向和垂直运动明显。我们的研究结果对晕动病的预测模型以及自动驾驶汽车的应用都有重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书