Management of progressive joint disorders by non-physician healthcare providers in South Africa: A mapping study to inform pharmacist integration.

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Tumelo Modau, Demitri Constantinou, Ané Orchard
{"title":"Management of progressive joint disorders by non-physician healthcare providers in South Africa: A mapping study to inform pharmacist integration.","authors":"Tumelo Modau, Demitri Constantinou, Ané Orchard","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Progressive joint disorders (PJDs), including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are leading causes of disability worldwide. Early multidisciplinary intervention is critical; however, delayed non-pharmacological management, fragmented referral pathways and limited integration of pharmacists, despite their potential role in medication management and early 'red flag' identification, remain common.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> To identify which PJDs are managed by which healthcare providers, to inform pharmacist referral pathways and promote integrated care.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Non-physician healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, chiropractors, podiatrists, osteopaths, biokineticists and other complementary therapy providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered via REDCap® and distributed by professional bodies through email and professional association platform advertisements. Descriptive statistics and quantitative content analysis assessed condition management, referral practices and collaboration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 266 HCPs participated. Osteoarthritis (91.7%) and RA (84.6%) were the most managed conditions. High interprofessional collaboration was noted with physiotherapists (71.4%) and limited with pharmacists (23.3%). Most providers (76.3%) did not require referral letters. Referrals to and from other providers were common, but incoming referrals varied by profession. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α 0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Progressive joint disorders were predominantly managed by chiropractors, physiotherapists and biokineticists. Referral pathways were inconsistent, and pharmacist integration remained limited.Contribution: This study presents the first national mapping of non-physician roles in PJD management in South Africa, providing critical insights for future development of pharmacist-inclusive referral guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"e1-e15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13247662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Progressive joint disorders (PJDs), including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are leading causes of disability worldwide. Early multidisciplinary intervention is critical; however, delayed non-pharmacological management, fragmented referral pathways and limited integration of pharmacists, despite their potential role in medication management and early 'red flag' identification, remain common.

Aim:  To identify which PJDs are managed by which healthcare providers, to inform pharmacist referral pathways and promote integrated care.

Setting:  Non-physician healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, chiropractors, podiatrists, osteopaths, biokineticists and other complementary therapy providers.

Methods:  A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered via REDCap® and distributed by professional bodies through email and professional association platform advertisements. Descriptive statistics and quantitative content analysis assessed condition management, referral practices and collaboration.

Results:  A total of 266 HCPs participated. Osteoarthritis (91.7%) and RA (84.6%) were the most managed conditions. High interprofessional collaboration was noted with physiotherapists (71.4%) and limited with pharmacists (23.3%). Most providers (76.3%) did not require referral letters. Referrals to and from other providers were common, but incoming referrals varied by profession. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α 0.70).

Conclusion:  Progressive joint disorders were predominantly managed by chiropractors, physiotherapists and biokineticists. Referral pathways were inconsistent, and pharmacist integration remained limited.Contribution: This study presents the first national mapping of non-physician roles in PJD management in South Africa, providing critical insights for future development of pharmacist-inclusive referral guidelines.

管理进行性关节疾病的非医生医疗保健提供者在南非:一项测绘研究,告知药师整合。
背景:进行性关节疾病(PJDs),包括骨关节炎、类风湿性关节炎(RA),是世界范围内致残的主要原因。早期多学科干预至关重要;然而,尽管药剂师在药物管理和早期“危险信号”识别方面具有潜在作用,但延迟的非药物管理、分散的转诊途径和有限的整合仍然很常见。目的:确定哪些pjd由哪些医疗保健提供者管理,告知药师转诊途径并促进综合护理。环境:南非的非医师医疗保健提供者(HCPs),包括物理治疗师、职业治疗师、脊椎指压治疗师、足病医生、整骨医生、生物动力学家和其他补充疗法提供者。方法:通过REDCap®进行定量横断面调查,并由专业机构通过电子邮件和专业协会平台广告进行分发。描述性统计和定量内容分析评估条件管理,转诊做法和协作。结果:共有266名医护人员参与。骨关节炎(91.7%)和类风湿性关节炎(84.6%)是最受控制的疾病。与物理治疗师(71.4%)的跨专业合作程度较高,与药剂师的跨专业合作程度较低(23.3%)。大多数提供者(76.3%)不需要推荐信。转介到其他提供者和从其他提供者是常见的,但传入的转介因专业而异。内部一致性可接受(Cronbach’s α 0.70)。结论:进行性关节疾病主要由指压治疗师、物理治疗师和生物动力学家治疗。转诊途径不一致,药师整合仍然有限。贡献:本研究提出了南非PJD管理中非医师角色的第一个国家映射,为药剂师包容性转诊指南的未来发展提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书