The influence of blastocyst quality versus blastulation speed on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer cycles: Insights from pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jae Kyun Park, Soyoung Bang, Yunmi Jeon, Min Kyoung Kim, Eun Mi Chang, Ji Won Kim, Woo Sik Lee
{"title":"The influence of blastocyst quality versus blastulation speed on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer cycles: Insights from pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.","authors":"Jae Kyun Park, Soyoung Bang, Yunmi Jeon, Min Kyoung Kim, Eun Mi Chang, Ji Won Kim, Woo Sik Lee","doi":"10.5653/cerm.2025.08578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of blastulation speed and blastocyst quality on pregnancy outcomes in single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 736 SVBT cycles conducted between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. Blastocysts were classified according to blastulation speed (day 5 vs. day 6) and morphological quality (top, good, average, and poor). A supplementary analysis included 395 blastocysts from 171 cycles that underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between 2022 and 2023. Ongoing pregnancy rates and euploidy rates were compared across blastulation speed and quality categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In SVBT cycles, the ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the day 5 group than in the day 6 group. However, no significant difference in ongoing pregnancy rates was observed between top-quality and good-quality blastocysts prior to vitrification, irrespective of blastulation speed. Average- and poor-quality blastocysts were more frequently observed in the day 6 group than in the day 5 group. In addition, euploidy rates were significantly higher in the day 5 group than in the day 6 group. However, no significant difference in euploidy rates was detected between top- or good-grade blastocysts derived from day 5 and day 6 embryos. By contrast, significant differences in euploidy rates were observed between average- and poor-quality blastocysts from day 5 and day 6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blastocyst quality has a significant influence on clinical outcomes, whereas blastulation speed appears to be comparatively less critical. For slow-developing embryos, vitrification of high-quality day 6 blastocysts may be preferable to the transfer of low-grade day 5 blastocysts, thereby providing practical clinical options for patients experiencing developmental delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":46409,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2025.08578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of blastulation speed and blastocyst quality on pregnancy outcomes in single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles.

Methods: A total of 736 SVBT cycles conducted between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. Blastocysts were classified according to blastulation speed (day 5 vs. day 6) and morphological quality (top, good, average, and poor). A supplementary analysis included 395 blastocysts from 171 cycles that underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between 2022 and 2023. Ongoing pregnancy rates and euploidy rates were compared across blastulation speed and quality categories.

Results: In SVBT cycles, the ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the day 5 group than in the day 6 group. However, no significant difference in ongoing pregnancy rates was observed between top-quality and good-quality blastocysts prior to vitrification, irrespective of blastulation speed. Average- and poor-quality blastocysts were more frequently observed in the day 6 group than in the day 5 group. In addition, euploidy rates were significantly higher in the day 5 group than in the day 6 group. However, no significant difference in euploidy rates was detected between top- or good-grade blastocysts derived from day 5 and day 6 embryos. By contrast, significant differences in euploidy rates were observed between average- and poor-quality blastocysts from day 5 and day 6.

Conclusion: Blastocyst quality has a significant influence on clinical outcomes, whereas blastulation speed appears to be comparatively less critical. For slow-developing embryos, vitrification of high-quality day 6 blastocysts may be preferable to the transfer of low-grade day 5 blastocysts, thereby providing practical clinical options for patients experiencing developmental delays.

在玻璃化加热的单胚胎移植周期中,囊胚质量和囊胚发育速度对妊娠结局的影响:来自非整倍体植入前基因检测的见解。
目的:探讨单周期玻璃化温热囊胚移植(SVBT)中囊胚发育速度和囊胚质量对妊娠结局的影响。方法:对2019年至2021年进行的736例SVBT循环进行分析。根据囊胚发育速度(第5天vs.第6天)和形态质量(顶级、良好、一般、差)对囊胚进行分类。一项补充分析包括来自171个周期的395个囊胚,这些囊胚在2022年至2023年间接受了植入前非整倍体基因检测。持续妊娠率和整倍体率在胚泡速度和质量类别中进行比较。结果:在SVBT周期中,第5天组持续妊娠率明显高于第6天组。然而,在玻璃化前,无论囊胚发育速度如何,观察到优质囊胚和优质囊胚之间的持续妊娠率没有显著差异。与第5天相比,第6天组的囊胚质量一般和较差。第5天组的整倍体率显著高于第6天组。然而,从第5天和第6天的胚胎中获得的顶级囊胚和良好囊胚的整倍体率没有显著差异。相比之下,从第5天和第6天,在平均质量和低质量囊胚之间观察到整倍体率的显著差异。结论:囊胚质量对临床预后有重要影响,而囊胚发育速度对临床预后的影响相对较小。对于发育缓慢的胚胎,玻璃化高质量的第6天囊胚可能比移植低质量的第5天囊胚更可取,从而为发育迟缓的患者提供实用的临床选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书