Newborn and infant hearing screening outcomes at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.

IF 1.7 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Silva Kuschke, Cheri Van Zyl, Mmakgotso Mokete, Lebogang Ramma
{"title":"Newborn and infant hearing screening outcomes at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.","authors":"Silva Kuschke, Cheri Van Zyl, Mmakgotso Mokete, Lebogang Ramma","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v73i1.1168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Despite national guidelines, newborn and infant hearing screening (NIHS) is not universally implemented in South Africa, with scarce data on programme outcomes within the public health sector.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> To describe NIHS outcomes and implementation patterns at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A retrospective record review of the audiology database and hospital records was conducted at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between August 2019 and August 2024. Of 7871 children under 6 years, 511 (6.5%) documented NIHS results and were included. Descriptive statistics summarised demographics, risk factors, referral sources, screening methods, and diagnostic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Neurological (41.1%) and infectious (25.2%) risk factors related to hearing loss were most prevalent. The mean age of initial screening was 16.3 months, and the mean age of diagnosis was 15.6 months, which is earlier than prior South African reports but substantially later than 1-3-6 benchmark and 2-4-8 benchmark. Most referrals originated from tertiary facilities (60.7%) versus primary healthcare centres (10%). Initial screening (68.7%) employed otoacoustic emissions (45.2% referral rate). Repeat screening, predominantly with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) (59.9%), reduced referrals to 1.1%. Diagnostic testing (n = 110) showed 40% normal hearing, 20% conductive losses, and a predominance of mild to moderate degrees of hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Hearing screening in this tertiary setting remains delayed, resource-dependent, and disproportionately tertiary-centred.Contribution: This study's results highlight the need to expand primary-level hearing screening, increase AABR use, and adopt standardised protocols to improve timely detection and intervention of hearing loss in South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"73 1","pages":"e1-e6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13243893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v73i1.1168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Despite national guidelines, newborn and infant hearing screening (NIHS) is not universally implemented in South Africa, with scarce data on programme outcomes within the public health sector.

Objectives:  To describe NIHS outcomes and implementation patterns at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape.

Method:  A retrospective record review of the audiology database and hospital records was conducted at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between August 2019 and August 2024. Of 7871 children under 6 years, 511 (6.5%) documented NIHS results and were included. Descriptive statistics summarised demographics, risk factors, referral sources, screening methods, and diagnostic outcomes.

Results:  Neurological (41.1%) and infectious (25.2%) risk factors related to hearing loss were most prevalent. The mean age of initial screening was 16.3 months, and the mean age of diagnosis was 15.6 months, which is earlier than prior South African reports but substantially later than 1-3-6 benchmark and 2-4-8 benchmark. Most referrals originated from tertiary facilities (60.7%) versus primary healthcare centres (10%). Initial screening (68.7%) employed otoacoustic emissions (45.2% referral rate). Repeat screening, predominantly with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) (59.9%), reduced referrals to 1.1%. Diagnostic testing (n = 110) showed 40% normal hearing, 20% conductive losses, and a predominance of mild to moderate degrees of hearing loss.

Conclusion:  Hearing screening in this tertiary setting remains delayed, resource-dependent, and disproportionately tertiary-centred.Contribution: This study's results highlight the need to expand primary-level hearing screening, increase AABR use, and adopt standardised protocols to improve timely detection and intervention of hearing loss in South Africa.

南非西开普省一家三级儿科医院新生儿和婴儿听力筛查结果。
背景:尽管有国家指导方针,但新生儿和婴儿听力筛查(NIHS)在南非并未普遍实施,公共卫生部门关于规划结果的数据很少。目的:描述西开普省一家三级儿科医院的国民健康保险结果和实施模式。方法:回顾性分析2019年8月至2024年8月红十字战争纪念儿童医院听力学数据库和医院记录。7871名6岁以下儿童中,511名(6.5%)记录了NIHS结果并被纳入研究。描述性统计总结了人口统计学、危险因素、转诊来源、筛查方法和诊断结果。结果:听力损失相关的危险因素以神经性因素(41.1%)和感染性因素(25.2%)最为普遍。首次筛查的平均年龄为16.3个月,平均诊断年龄为15.6个月,这比南非之前的报告早,但大大晚于1-6-6基准和2-4-8基准。大多数转诊来自三级设施(60.7%),而初级保健中心(10%)。初次筛查(68.7%)采用耳声发射(转诊率45.2%)。重复筛查,主要是自动听觉脑干反应(AABR)(59.9%),减少转诊至1.1%。诊断测试(n = 110)显示40%的听力正常,20%的传导性听力损失,以轻度至中度听力损失为主。结论:听力筛查在这个三级设置仍然延迟,资源依赖,不成比例的三级中心。贡献:本研究的结果强调需要扩大初级听力筛查,增加AABR的使用,并采用标准化方案,以改善南非听力损失的及时发现和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书