Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Objectively Quantify Adherence to Offloading Interventions.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sai V Yalla, Sanam N Jhaveri, Nahir S Negron-Fernandez, Ryan T Crews, Noah J Rosenblatt
{"title":"Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Objectively Quantify Adherence to Offloading Interventions.","authors":"Sai V Yalla, Sanam N Jhaveri, Nahir S Negron-Fernandez, Ryan T Crews, Noah J Rosenblatt","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers require offloading for healing. However, adherence with removable offloading devices is often poor. Prior objective measures of adherence yielded important behavioral insights, despite substantial methodological limitations. This study sought to address these limitations by developing a method to track offloading adherence during walking and standing paired with tracking contralateral therapeutic footwear (shoe-lift) use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy adults wore a removable cast walker (RCW) and contralateral shoe-lift. Accelerometers were placed on both and unilaterally on participants' thighs. Participants performed activities in the laboratory that were logged by investigators, after which monitoring continued for 24 h with participants logging footwear use in a diary. Walking and standing episodes were quantified via the thigh worn monitor. A custom algorithm was developed to classify RCW and shoe-lift adherence during walking and standing based on sample-to-sample variance thresholds. Algorithm accuracy was determined by comparing its adherence metrics with log entries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final algorithm resulted in > 99% accuracy in detecting steps and standing while using the RCW and shoe-lift during in-lab testing. In 24-h, community monitoring, algorithm-derived adherence showed excellent agreement with diary-based adherence (ICC > 0.96, p < 0.01). Error rates (misclassifications) were < 3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A method to objectively quantify RCW and contralateral shoe-lift adherence use was developed and validated. Strong agreement with lab observations and user diaries support its use for monitoring real-world offloading behavior. This method will allow for enhanced assessments of adherence in future trials and may eventually be incorporated into clinical practice for patient monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"19 2","pages":"e70170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers require offloading for healing. However, adherence with removable offloading devices is often poor. Prior objective measures of adherence yielded important behavioral insights, despite substantial methodological limitations. This study sought to address these limitations by developing a method to track offloading adherence during walking and standing paired with tracking contralateral therapeutic footwear (shoe-lift) use.

Methods: Thirty healthy adults wore a removable cast walker (RCW) and contralateral shoe-lift. Accelerometers were placed on both and unilaterally on participants' thighs. Participants performed activities in the laboratory that were logged by investigators, after which monitoring continued for 24 h with participants logging footwear use in a diary. Walking and standing episodes were quantified via the thigh worn monitor. A custom algorithm was developed to classify RCW and shoe-lift adherence during walking and standing based on sample-to-sample variance thresholds. Algorithm accuracy was determined by comparing its adherence metrics with log entries.

Results: The final algorithm resulted in > 99% accuracy in detecting steps and standing while using the RCW and shoe-lift during in-lab testing. In 24-h, community monitoring, algorithm-derived adherence showed excellent agreement with diary-based adherence (ICC > 0.96, p < 0.01). Error rates (misclassifications) were < 3%.

Conclusion: A method to objectively quantify RCW and contralateral shoe-lift adherence use was developed and validated. Strong agreement with lab observations and user diaries support its use for monitoring real-world offloading behavior. This method will allow for enhanced assessments of adherence in future trials and may eventually be incorporated into clinical practice for patient monitoring.

一种客观量化卸载干预依从性的算法的开发和验证。
背景:糖尿病足溃疡需要卸载愈合。然而,可拆卸卸荷装置的依从性通常很差。先前的客观测量依从性产生了重要的行为见解,尽管有大量的方法局限性。本研究试图通过开发一种方法来跟踪行走和站立期间的卸载依从性,并跟踪对侧治疗性鞋(提鞋)的使用,从而解决这些局限性。方法:30名健康成人使用可移动助行器(RCW)和对侧提鞋器。加速度计被放置在参与者的大腿两侧和单侧。参与者在实验室进行活动,由调查人员记录下来,之后持续监测24小时,参与者在日记中记录鞋子的使用情况。行走和站立发作通过大腿磨损监测仪进行量化。开发了一种自定义算法,根据样本间方差阈值对行走和站立时的RCW和提鞋依从性进行分类。通过将其遵守指标与日志条目进行比较来确定算法的准确性。结果:在实验室测试中,使用RCW和提鞋时,最终算法在检测步骤和站立时的准确率为bb0 99%。在24小时的社区监测中,算法衍生的依从性与基于日记的依从性表现出极好的一致性(ICC > 0.96, p)。结论:开发并验证了一种客观量化RCW和对侧提鞋依从性的方法。与实验室观察和用户日记的强烈一致支持它用于监控现实世界的卸载行为。该方法将允许在未来的试验中加强对依从性的评估,并可能最终纳入临床实践,用于患者监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书