Sai V Yalla, Sanam N Jhaveri, Nahir S Negron-Fernandez, Ryan T Crews, Noah J Rosenblatt
{"title":"Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Objectively Quantify Adherence to Offloading Interventions.","authors":"Sai V Yalla, Sanam N Jhaveri, Nahir S Negron-Fernandez, Ryan T Crews, Noah J Rosenblatt","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers require offloading for healing. However, adherence with removable offloading devices is often poor. Prior objective measures of adherence yielded important behavioral insights, despite substantial methodological limitations. This study sought to address these limitations by developing a method to track offloading adherence during walking and standing paired with tracking contralateral therapeutic footwear (shoe-lift) use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy adults wore a removable cast walker (RCW) and contralateral shoe-lift. Accelerometers were placed on both and unilaterally on participants' thighs. Participants performed activities in the laboratory that were logged by investigators, after which monitoring continued for 24 h with participants logging footwear use in a diary. Walking and standing episodes were quantified via the thigh worn monitor. A custom algorithm was developed to classify RCW and shoe-lift adherence during walking and standing based on sample-to-sample variance thresholds. Algorithm accuracy was determined by comparing its adherence metrics with log entries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final algorithm resulted in > 99% accuracy in detecting steps and standing while using the RCW and shoe-lift during in-lab testing. In 24-h, community monitoring, algorithm-derived adherence showed excellent agreement with diary-based adherence (ICC > 0.96, p < 0.01). Error rates (misclassifications) were < 3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A method to objectively quantify RCW and contralateral shoe-lift adherence use was developed and validated. Strong agreement with lab observations and user diaries support its use for monitoring real-world offloading behavior. This method will allow for enhanced assessments of adherence in future trials and may eventually be incorporated into clinical practice for patient monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"19 2","pages":"e70170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot ulcers require offloading for healing. However, adherence with removable offloading devices is often poor. Prior objective measures of adherence yielded important behavioral insights, despite substantial methodological limitations. This study sought to address these limitations by developing a method to track offloading adherence during walking and standing paired with tracking contralateral therapeutic footwear (shoe-lift) use.
Methods: Thirty healthy adults wore a removable cast walker (RCW) and contralateral shoe-lift. Accelerometers were placed on both and unilaterally on participants' thighs. Participants performed activities in the laboratory that were logged by investigators, after which monitoring continued for 24 h with participants logging footwear use in a diary. Walking and standing episodes were quantified via the thigh worn monitor. A custom algorithm was developed to classify RCW and shoe-lift adherence during walking and standing based on sample-to-sample variance thresholds. Algorithm accuracy was determined by comparing its adherence metrics with log entries.
Results: The final algorithm resulted in > 99% accuracy in detecting steps and standing while using the RCW and shoe-lift during in-lab testing. In 24-h, community monitoring, algorithm-derived adherence showed excellent agreement with diary-based adherence (ICC > 0.96, p < 0.01). Error rates (misclassifications) were < 3%.
Conclusion: A method to objectively quantify RCW and contralateral shoe-lift adherence use was developed and validated. Strong agreement with lab observations and user diaries support its use for monitoring real-world offloading behavior. This method will allow for enhanced assessments of adherence in future trials and may eventually be incorporated into clinical practice for patient monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.