Measurements of distalization and lateralization do not correlate with patient reported outcome measures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

IF 2.5 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-04 DOI:10.5397/cise.2025.01508
Sofia Griff, Noah E DiNapoli, James A Rhead, Garrett S Bullock, Brian R Waterman, Nicholas A Trasolini, Benjamin R Graves, Alan W Reynolds
{"title":"Measurements of distalization and lateralization do not correlate with patient reported outcome measures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.","authors":"Sofia Griff, Noah E DiNapoli, James A Rhead, Garrett S Bullock, Brian R Waterman, Nicholas A Trasolini, Benjamin R Graves, Alan W Reynolds","doi":"10.5397/cise.2025.01508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimization of implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty produces evolving and conflicting data. The distalization-lateralization index (DLI) has been introduced as a measurement that combines both lateralization and distalization. This study aimed to determine whether legacy and novel measurements correlate with patient reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution between 2016 and 2022 and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were screened by retrospective chart review. Radiographs were used to measure the lateralization shoulder angle, distalization shoulder angle, acromiohumeral interval (AHI), acromiohumeral offset (AHO), and glenohumeral offset (GHO). DLI and ΔDLI were calculated from the ΔAHI and ΔAHO. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify correlations between any measurements and the postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed from 140 patients with an average age of 71 years and average follow-up of 3.3 years. AHO had an adjusted mean difference of -0.29 mm (P=0.009) between high and low ASES score groups. There was a weak, but statistically significant association between the ASES score and the DLI (r=0.181, P=0.032) in the simple linear regression, but no association was found in the multivariable linear regression, β=0.46 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.95; P=0.072).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased DLI was found to be weakly associated with higher ASES scores in the univariate analysis, but not after controlling for other variables. Although the correlation was not statistically significant, both the DLI and GHO were associated with higher ASES scores in the multivariate analysis, warranting further study with larger patient cohorts. Level of evidence: III.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"334-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13574844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2025.01508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimization of implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty produces evolving and conflicting data. The distalization-lateralization index (DLI) has been introduced as a measurement that combines both lateralization and distalization. This study aimed to determine whether legacy and novel measurements correlate with patient reported outcomes.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution between 2016 and 2022 and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were screened by retrospective chart review. Radiographs were used to measure the lateralization shoulder angle, distalization shoulder angle, acromiohumeral interval (AHI), acromiohumeral offset (AHO), and glenohumeral offset (GHO). DLI and ΔDLI were calculated from the ΔAHI and ΔAHO. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify correlations between any measurements and the postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.

Results: Data were analyzed from 140 patients with an average age of 71 years and average follow-up of 3.3 years. AHO had an adjusted mean difference of -0.29 mm (P=0.009) between high and low ASES score groups. There was a weak, but statistically significant association between the ASES score and the DLI (r=0.181, P=0.032) in the simple linear regression, but no association was found in the multivariable linear regression, β=0.46 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.95; P=0.072).

Conclusions: Increased DLI was found to be weakly associated with higher ASES scores in the univariate analysis, but not after controlling for other variables. Although the correlation was not statistically significant, both the DLI and GHO were associated with higher ASES scores in the multivariate analysis, warranting further study with larger patient cohorts. Level of evidence: III.

测量远端和侧方与患者报告的肩关节置换术后的结果不相关。
背景:反向肩关节置换术中植入物定位的优化产生了不断发展和矛盾的数据。远侧化指数(DLI)是一种结合了侧化和远侧化的测量方法。本研究旨在确定传统和新测量是否与患者报告的结果相关。方法:采用回顾性图表法筛选2016年至2022年间在单一机构接受原发性肩关节置换术且至少随访2年的患者。x线片测量肩侧角、远侧角、肩肱骨间隔(AHI)、肩肱骨偏移(ho)和肩关节偏移(GHO)。DLI和ΔDLI分别由ΔAHI和ΔAHO计算。进行线性回归分析,以确定任何测量值与术后美国肩肘外科医生评分之间的相关性。结果:140例患者资料分析,平均年龄71岁,平均随访3.3年。asa高、低评分组的调整后平均差异为-0.29 (P=0.009)。在简单线性回归中,asa评分与DLI有微弱的相关性(r=0.181, P=0.032),而在多变量线性回归中,β=0.46 (95% CI, -0.04 ~ 0.95; P=0.072),无显著相关性。结论:在单变量分析中,DLI升高与较高的ASES评分呈弱相关,但在控制其他变量后则无明显相关性。虽然相关性无统计学意义,但在多变量分析中,DLI和GHO均与较高的ASES评分相关,因此有必要在更大的患者队列中进行进一步研究。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书