Thyroid dose guidance in elective supraclavicular breast radiotherapy: a national survey of practice patterns in Switzerland.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
M S Koch, D R Zwahlen, A Clivio, M Bendahman, D Benzaquen, M Betz, P Canino, D Correia, B De Bari, O Fargier Bochaton, T Finazzi, M Gau, G Gruber, R Gräter, G Henke, E Herrmann, K Khanfir, R Krcek, K Lössl, T Mader, O Matzinger, L Negretti, C Panje, N Péguret, L Plasswilm, P Tsoutsou, F Zimmermann, C Oehler
{"title":"Thyroid dose guidance in elective supraclavicular breast radiotherapy: a national survey of practice patterns in Switzerland.","authors":"M S Koch, D R Zwahlen, A Clivio, M Bendahman, D Benzaquen, M Betz, P Canino, D Correia, B De Bari, O Fargier Bochaton, T Finazzi, M Gau, G Gruber, R Gräter, G Henke, E Herrmann, K Khanfir, R Krcek, K Lössl, T Mader, O Matzinger, L Negretti, C Panje, N Péguret, L Plasswilm, P Tsoutsou, F Zimmermann, C Oehler","doi":"10.1007/s00066-026-02557-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supraclavicular fossa (SCF) irradiation is integral to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for node-positive breast cancer. Due to anatomical proximity, the thyroid gland is frequently exposed, leading to hypothyroidism in approximately 20-40% of long-term survivors. Despite robust dose-response evidence, thyroid management remains inconsistent and breast cancer-specific dose guidance is lacking. This nationwide survey evaluated current practice patterns regarding thyroid delineation, SCF contouring, and thyroid dose guidance during elective SCF irradiation in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured electronic questionnaire was distributed between May and November 2025 to all 30 Swiss radiation oncology centers treating breast cancer. Institutional characteristics, thyroid contouring practices, SCF target delineation, and applied thyroid dose guidance were assessed. Analyses were descriptive only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three responses from 25 of 30 centers (83%), including all university hospitals, were analyzed. Modern RT techniques were widely implemented (VMAT 79%, IMRT 15%). Routine thyroid contouring was reported by 91% of respondents, of which 94% used AI-assisted tools. However, only 55% applied explicit thyroid dose guidance. Reported mean thyroid dose (D<sub>mean</sub>) thresholds ranged from 12 to 35 Gy and clustered at 13.5-15 Gy, 20-21 Gy, and 30-32 Gy. Excluding ALARA (\"as low as reasonably achievable\") responses, the median D<sub>mean</sub> guidance was 21 Gy (IQR 16-30 Gy). SCF delineation varied substantially, particularly regarding superior and medial margins, and 64% reported CTV/PTV cropping to reduce thyroid dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite strong dose-response evidence and widespread availability of advanced RT techniques, thyroid protection during elective SCF irradiation remains inconsistently implemented. These findings reveal a gap between evidence and practice and support the development of harmonized, breast cancer-specific recommendations, including routine thyroid delineation, anatomy-based SCF contouring, and explicit, oncologically safe dose guidance-particularly D<sub>mean</sub> targets of ≤ 13.5 Gy, with ≤20-21 Gy as a pragmatic upper limit-to reduce radiation-induced hypothyroidism without compromising cancer control.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-026-02557-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Supraclavicular fossa (SCF) irradiation is integral to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for node-positive breast cancer. Due to anatomical proximity, the thyroid gland is frequently exposed, leading to hypothyroidism in approximately 20-40% of long-term survivors. Despite robust dose-response evidence, thyroid management remains inconsistent and breast cancer-specific dose guidance is lacking. This nationwide survey evaluated current practice patterns regarding thyroid delineation, SCF contouring, and thyroid dose guidance during elective SCF irradiation in Switzerland.

Methods: A structured electronic questionnaire was distributed between May and November 2025 to all 30 Swiss radiation oncology centers treating breast cancer. Institutional characteristics, thyroid contouring practices, SCF target delineation, and applied thyroid dose guidance were assessed. Analyses were descriptive only.

Results: Thirty-three responses from 25 of 30 centers (83%), including all university hospitals, were analyzed. Modern RT techniques were widely implemented (VMAT 79%, IMRT 15%). Routine thyroid contouring was reported by 91% of respondents, of which 94% used AI-assisted tools. However, only 55% applied explicit thyroid dose guidance. Reported mean thyroid dose (Dmean) thresholds ranged from 12 to 35 Gy and clustered at 13.5-15 Gy, 20-21 Gy, and 30-32 Gy. Excluding ALARA ("as low as reasonably achievable") responses, the median Dmean guidance was 21 Gy (IQR 16-30 Gy). SCF delineation varied substantially, particularly regarding superior and medial margins, and 64% reported CTV/PTV cropping to reduce thyroid dose.

Conclusions: Despite strong dose-response evidence and widespread availability of advanced RT techniques, thyroid protection during elective SCF irradiation remains inconsistently implemented. These findings reveal a gap between evidence and practice and support the development of harmonized, breast cancer-specific recommendations, including routine thyroid delineation, anatomy-based SCF contouring, and explicit, oncologically safe dose guidance-particularly Dmean targets of ≤ 13.5 Gy, with ≤20-21 Gy as a pragmatic upper limit-to reduce radiation-induced hypothyroidism without compromising cancer control.

选择性锁骨上乳房放射治疗的甲状腺剂量指导:瑞士全国实践模式调查。
背景:锁骨上窝(SCF)照射是淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助放疗(RT)不可或缺的一部分。由于解剖上的接近,甲状腺经常暴露,导致约20-40%的长期幸存者甲状腺功能减退。尽管有强有力的剂量反应证据,甲状腺治疗仍然不一致,缺乏乳腺癌特异性剂量指导。这项全国范围的调查评估了目前在瑞士选择性SCF照射期间有关甲状腺圈定、SCF轮廓和甲状腺剂量指导的实践模式。方法:于2025年5月至11月向瑞士所有30家治疗乳腺癌的放射肿瘤中心分发结构化电子问卷。评估了机构特征、甲状腺轮廓法、SCF靶划定和应用甲状腺剂量指导。分析只是描述性的。结果:分析了来自30个中心中的25个(83%)的33份回复,包括所有大学医院。现代RT技术广泛应用(VMAT 79%, IMRT 15%)。91%的受访者报告了常规甲状腺轮廓,其中94%使用人工智能辅助工具。然而,只有55%的患者应用了明确的甲状腺剂量指导。报告的平均甲状腺剂量(Dmean)阈值范围为12至35 Gy,聚集在13.5-15 Gy, 20-21 Gy和30-32 Gy。排除ALARA(“尽可能低的合理可达到”)反应,中位Dmean指导为21 Gy (IQR 16-30 Gy)。SCF的描绘变化很大,特别是在上缘和内侧缘,64%的人报告CTV/PTV切除以减少甲状腺剂量。结论:尽管有强有力的剂量反应证据和先进的放射治疗技术的广泛应用,选择性SCF照射期间的甲状腺保护仍然不一致。这些发现揭示了证据与实践之间的差距,并支持统一的乳腺癌特异性建议的发展,包括常规甲状腺描绘,基于解剖结构的SCF轮廓,以及明确的肿瘤学安全剂量指南-特别是Dmean目标≤ 13.5 Gy,以≤20-21 Gy为实用上限-减少辐射引起的甲状腺功能低下而不影响癌症控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书