Enhanced detection of vascularization in rectal endometriosis: A comparative study of microvascular flow and power Doppler.

IF 1.2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Juan Luis Alcazar, Diego Maria Pich Barroso, Oscar Sanchez, Ignacio Brunel, Jose Carlos Vilches, Rodrigo Orozco
{"title":"Enhanced detection of vascularization in rectal endometriosis: A comparative study of microvascular flow and power Doppler.","authors":"Juan Luis Alcazar, Diego Maria Pich Barroso, Oscar Sanchez, Ignacio Brunel, Jose Carlos Vilches, Rodrigo Orozco","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventionally, rectal endometriotic nodules have been considered as poorly vascularized. However, new, more sensitive, Doppler techniques have been developed recently for assessing microvascularization. These new techniques might allow microvascularity in these lesions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the vascularization of rectal endometriotic nodules using microvascular (MV) flow and conventional power Doppler.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty consecutive women diagnosed with deep endometriosis involving the rectum were recruited for this prospective study. All women underwent transvaginal ultrasound using a Samsung V8 ultrasound system (Samsung Medison, Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). The scanning protocol was performed according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis consensus. Endometriotic lesions involving the rectum were identified as hypoechoic lesions with blurred margins. Then, power Doppler was activated and the vascularization of the lesion was assessed. Immediately after, the MV-Flow™ with the LumiFlow™ was activated and the vascularization was assessed again. Vascularization assessment was undertaken based on the subjective examiner's impression, using the vascular score proposed by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vascular score using conventional power Doppler was score 1 in 87% (<i>n</i> = 26) and score 2 in 13% (<i>n</i> = 4) of the lesions, respectively. The vascular score using MV-Flow™ was score 1 in 6% (<i>n</i> = 2), score 2 in 27% (<i>n</i> = 8), score 3 in 40% (<i>n</i> = 12) and score 4 in 27% (<i>n</i> = 8) of the cases. Grouping cases into score 1-2 <i>vs</i> score 3-4, there was a statistically significant difference with score 3-4 when using MV-Flow™ (67% <i>vs</i> 0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that many rectal endometriotic nodules exhibit more vascularization than previously thought when using MV-Flow™.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"18 5","pages":"119223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13226641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventionally, rectal endometriotic nodules have been considered as poorly vascularized. However, new, more sensitive, Doppler techniques have been developed recently for assessing microvascularization. These new techniques might allow microvascularity in these lesions.

Aim: To compare the vascularization of rectal endometriotic nodules using microvascular (MV) flow and conventional power Doppler.

Methods: Thirty consecutive women diagnosed with deep endometriosis involving the rectum were recruited for this prospective study. All women underwent transvaginal ultrasound using a Samsung V8 ultrasound system (Samsung Medison, Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). The scanning protocol was performed according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis consensus. Endometriotic lesions involving the rectum were identified as hypoechoic lesions with blurred margins. Then, power Doppler was activated and the vascularization of the lesion was assessed. Immediately after, the MV-Flow™ with the LumiFlow™ was activated and the vascularization was assessed again. Vascularization assessment was undertaken based on the subjective examiner's impression, using the vascular score proposed by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.

Results: The vascular score using conventional power Doppler was score 1 in 87% (n = 26) and score 2 in 13% (n = 4) of the lesions, respectively. The vascular score using MV-Flow™ was score 1 in 6% (n = 2), score 2 in 27% (n = 8), score 3 in 40% (n = 12) and score 4 in 27% (n = 8) of the cases. Grouping cases into score 1-2 vs score 3-4, there was a statistically significant difference with score 3-4 when using MV-Flow™ (67% vs 0%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study shows that many rectal endometriotic nodules exhibit more vascularization than previously thought when using MV-Flow™.

直肠子宫内膜异位症血管化的增强检测:微血管流动和功率多普勒的比较研究。
背景:传统上,直肠子宫内膜异位结节被认为血管化不良。然而,新的,更敏感的,多普勒技术最近已开发用于评估微血管。这些新技术可能允许在这些病变中建立微血管。目的:比较微血管血流与常规功率多普勒对直肠子宫内膜异位症结节血管化的影响。方法:连续30名诊断为深部子宫内膜异位症累及直肠的妇女被纳入这项前瞻性研究。所有女性均使用Samsung V8超声系统(Samsung Medison, Co., Ltd, Seoul, South Korea)进行阴道超声检查。扫描方案按照国际深层子宫内膜异位症分析共识进行。子宫内膜异位症病变累及直肠被确定为低回声病变,边缘模糊。然后,激活功率多普勒,评估病变血管的形成情况。随后,立即激活MV-Flow™和LumiFlow™,再次评估血管化情况。血管化评估基于主考官的印象,使用国际卵巢肿瘤分析小组提出的血管评分。结果:常规功率多普勒血管评分为1分的病变占87% (n = 26), 2分的病变占13% (n = 4)。MV-Flow™血管评分为6% (n = 2)为1分,27% (n = 8)为2分,40% (n = 12)为3分,27% (n = 8)为4分。将病例分为1-2分与3-4分,使用MV-Flow™时与3-4分的差异有统计学意义(67% vs 0%, P < 0.01)。结论:本研究表明,使用MV-Flow™治疗许多直肠子宫内膜异位症结节时,血管化程度比先前认为的要高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书