The differential effects of psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic intervention on symptom severity and functioning in children and adolescents with internalizing problems: a systematic review protocol.

IF 5.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dylan Johnson, Peter Szatmari, Brendan F Andrade, Karolin Krause, Emma Nolan, Carly Albaum
{"title":"The differential effects of psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic intervention on symptom severity and functioning in children and adolescents with internalizing problems: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Dylan Johnson, Peter Szatmari, Brendan F Andrade, Karolin Krause, Emma Nolan, Carly Albaum","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03231-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internalizing problems, such as depression and anxiety, are common among children and adolescents, contributing significantly to impairment in various domains of functioning, including academic, social, and family life. While pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic interventions are effective in reducing symptoms, it remains unclear whether these treatments have similar effects to improve functioning. Functional impairment in youth can have long-term consequences, including increased risks for mental health issues, physical health problems, and social difficulties. Despite its importance, functional improvement is often overlooked in mental health intervention research. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze interventions that target internalizing symptoms, and assess both symptom reduction and improvements in functioning as treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO, will identify randomized controlled trials published between 2014 and 2024 that evaluate psychotherapeutic or pharmacologic treatments for depressive or anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents. Eligible studies will measure both symptom severity and functioning outcomes. Data will be extracted independently by two reviewers, and effect sizes will be calculated using standardized mean differences. Multilevel meta-analytic procedures will be employed to assess both mean differences and variability within studies. Moderator analyses will explore factors such as treatment type, internalizing disorder subtype, and sociodemographic factors. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework will guide the synthesis of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of mental health interventions for youth with internalizing disorders, focusing on both reductions in symptom severity and improvements in functioning. The findings will contribute to the development of clinical guidelines and treatment recommendations, emphasizing the importance of addressing functional outcomes in addition to symptom reduction. The results will have implications for the design and evaluation of future interventions aimed at improving the well-being of children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024610658).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13449698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03231-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Internalizing problems, such as depression and anxiety, are common among children and adolescents, contributing significantly to impairment in various domains of functioning, including academic, social, and family life. While pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic interventions are effective in reducing symptoms, it remains unclear whether these treatments have similar effects to improve functioning. Functional impairment in youth can have long-term consequences, including increased risks for mental health issues, physical health problems, and social difficulties. Despite its importance, functional improvement is often overlooked in mental health intervention research. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze interventions that target internalizing symptoms, and assess both symptom reduction and improvements in functioning as treatment outcomes.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO, will identify randomized controlled trials published between 2014 and 2024 that evaluate psychotherapeutic or pharmacologic treatments for depressive or anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents. Eligible studies will measure both symptom severity and functioning outcomes. Data will be extracted independently by two reviewers, and effect sizes will be calculated using standardized mean differences. Multilevel meta-analytic procedures will be employed to assess both mean differences and variability within studies. Moderator analyses will explore factors such as treatment type, internalizing disorder subtype, and sociodemographic factors. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework will guide the synthesis of the evidence.

Discussion: This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of mental health interventions for youth with internalizing disorders, focusing on both reductions in symptom severity and improvements in functioning. The findings will contribute to the development of clinical guidelines and treatment recommendations, emphasizing the importance of addressing functional outcomes in addition to symptom reduction. The results will have implications for the design and evaluation of future interventions aimed at improving the well-being of children and adolescents.

Systematic review registration: This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024610658).

心理治疗和药物干预对有内化问题的儿童和青少年症状严重程度和功能的不同影响:一项系统回顾方案。
背景:内化问题,如抑郁和焦虑,在儿童和青少年中很常见,对各种功能领域的损害有重要影响,包括学业、社会和家庭生活。虽然药物和心理治疗干预在减轻症状方面是有效的,但尚不清楚这些治疗是否具有改善功能的类似效果。青少年的功能障碍可能产生长期后果,包括增加精神健康问题、身体健康问题和社会困难的风险。尽管功能改善很重要,但在心理健康干预研究中往往被忽视。本研究旨在系统回顾和荟萃分析针对内化症状的干预措施,并评估症状减轻和功能改善作为治疗结果。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。对包括CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和PsycINFO在内的电子数据库进行全面搜索,将发现2014年至2024年间发表的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了儿童和青少年抑郁或焦虑症状的心理治疗或药物治疗。合格的研究将测量症状严重程度和功能结果。数据将由两位审稿人独立提取,效应量将使用标准化平均差异计算。将采用多水平荟萃分析程序来评估研究中的平均差异和变异性。调节分析将探讨治疗类型、内化障碍亚型和社会人口因素等因素。偏倚风险将使用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具进行评估,推荐、评估、发展和评估的分级框架将指导证据的综合。讨论:本综述旨在全面了解心理健康干预对患有内化障碍的青少年的有效性,重点关注症状严重程度的降低和功能的改善。这些发现将有助于临床指南和治疗建议的制定,强调除了减轻症状外,解决功能结果的重要性。研究结果将对旨在改善儿童和青少年福祉的未来干预措施的设计和评价产生影响。系统综述注册:本系统综述在PROSPERO数据库中注册(CRD42024610658)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书