Male Pelvic Health in Saudi Arabia: Knowledge-Practice Gap in Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Implications for Preventive Physiotherapy and Health Policy.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saudi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-13 DOI:10.15537/1658-3175.8791
Wael A S Alghamdi
{"title":"Male Pelvic Health in Saudi Arabia: <i>Knowledge-Practice Gap in Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Implications for Preventive Physiotherapy and Health Policy</i>.","authors":"Wael A S Alghamdi","doi":"10.15537/1658-3175.8791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of Saudi men toward pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and to identify demographic and clinical predictors of awareness and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 458 Saudi men in Al-Baha using a validated Arabic questionnaire adapted from the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Data were analyzed with chi-square tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's α= 0.862).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Awareness of PFMT was moderate (63.1%), but only 13.1% knew how to perform PFMT correctly. Attitudes were largely positive (72.9%), citing benefits such as relief of back/pelvic pain (33.7%) and core strengthening (32.9%). Practice was limited, with only 11.6% performing PFMT regularly. Knowledge and positive attitudes were significantly associated with practice (χ<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> <0.001). Urinary incontinence was uncommon (86% reported none), though symptoms such as incomplete bladder emptying (27.7%) and defecation difficulty (31%) were frequent. Older men (≥55 years) and divorced men reported significantly higher symptom scores (<i>p</i> <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first KAP study of PFMT among Saudi men demonstrated a gap between awareness and regular practice. The findings highlight the need for physiotherapist-led education, structured skills training, and scalable digital platforms to transform awareness into sustainable practice and improve men's pelvic health.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":"47 6","pages":"1071-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13217634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/1658-3175.8791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of Saudi men toward pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and to identify demographic and clinical predictors of awareness and practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 458 Saudi men in Al-Baha using a validated Arabic questionnaire adapted from the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Data were analyzed with chi-square tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's α= 0.862).

Results: Awareness of PFMT was moderate (63.1%), but only 13.1% knew how to perform PFMT correctly. Attitudes were largely positive (72.9%), citing benefits such as relief of back/pelvic pain (33.7%) and core strengthening (32.9%). Practice was limited, with only 11.6% performing PFMT regularly. Knowledge and positive attitudes were significantly associated with practice (χ2, p <0.001). Urinary incontinence was uncommon (86% reported none), though symptoms such as incomplete bladder emptying (27.7%) and defecation difficulty (31%) were frequent. Older men (≥55 years) and divorced men reported significantly higher symptom scores (p <0.01).

Conclusion: This first KAP study of PFMT among Saudi men demonstrated a gap between awareness and regular practice. The findings highlight the need for physiotherapist-led education, structured skills training, and scalable digital platforms to transform awareness into sustainable practice and improve men's pelvic health.

沙特阿拉伯男性盆腔健康:盆底肌肉锻炼的知识与实践差距及其对预防性物理治疗和健康政策的影响
目的:评估沙特男性对骨盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)的知识、态度和实践(KAP),并确定意识和实践的人口统计学和临床预测因素。方法:对Al-Baha地区458名沙特男性进行横断面调查,采用经验证的阿拉伯语问卷,该问卷改编自盆底窘迫量表(PFDI-20)、盆底影响问卷(PFIQ-7)和尿失禁国际咨询问卷-尿失禁简表(ICIQ-UI SF)。资料采用卡方检验、方差分析(ANOVA)和信度检验(Cronbach’s α= 0.862)。结果:患者对PFMT的认知度中等(63.1%),但仅有13.1%的患者知道如何正确执行PFMT。态度大多是积极的(72.9%),提到了缓解背部/骨盆疼痛(33.7%)和核心强化(32.9%)等益处。实践是有限的,只有11.6%的人定期进行PFMT。知识和积极态度与实践显著相关(χ2, p p)。结论:沙特男性PFMT的首次KAP研究表明,意识和常规实践之间存在差距。研究结果强调了物理治疗师主导的教育、结构化技能培训和可扩展的数字平台的必要性,以将意识转化为可持续的实践,并改善男性盆腔健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书