Examining autobiographical memory retrieval as an intervention to increase physical activity in adults aged 60 and older.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Memory Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-03 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2026.2680911
Zuzanna Smurzynska, Emily Lerolland, Karen L Siedlecki
{"title":"Examining autobiographical memory retrieval as an intervention to increase physical activity in adults aged 60 and older.","authors":"Zuzanna Smurzynska, Emily Lerolland, Karen L Siedlecki","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2026.2680911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research examining the directive function in autobiographical memory in college-aged participants found that recalling autobiographical memories related to physical activity was associated with an increase in subsequent physical activity. The current study, using an experimental test-retest design, examined whether this same effect was evident in a sample of adults aged 60 and older. At Time 1, participants (<i>N</i> = 451) were randomly assigned to the control or experimental groups and asked to complete a survey assessing physical activity and health; the experimental groups were asked to recall either a positive or negative motivational memory associated with exercise. Participants (<i>N</i> = 340) completed a similar survey seven days later. Levels of exercise were compared between Time 1 and Time 2 to examine whether the memory retrieval intervention had a significant impact on the level of physical activity. There was no significant main effect of memory condition on Time 2 physical activity, suggesting that the effect may not generalise to older adults. This null finding provides support for the assertion that the directive function may be more limited and specific than originally thought and that other factors may be more important for influencing behaviour (e.g., age-related differences in motivation).</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"887-893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2680911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research examining the directive function in autobiographical memory in college-aged participants found that recalling autobiographical memories related to physical activity was associated with an increase in subsequent physical activity. The current study, using an experimental test-retest design, examined whether this same effect was evident in a sample of adults aged 60 and older. At Time 1, participants (N = 451) were randomly assigned to the control or experimental groups and asked to complete a survey assessing physical activity and health; the experimental groups were asked to recall either a positive or negative motivational memory associated with exercise. Participants (N = 340) completed a similar survey seven days later. Levels of exercise were compared between Time 1 and Time 2 to examine whether the memory retrieval intervention had a significant impact on the level of physical activity. There was no significant main effect of memory condition on Time 2 physical activity, suggesting that the effect may not generalise to older adults. This null finding provides support for the assertion that the directive function may be more limited and specific than originally thought and that other factors may be more important for influencing behaviour (e.g., age-related differences in motivation).

检查自传式记忆检索作为一种干预措施,以增加60岁及以上成年人的身体活动。
先前的研究考察了大学年龄参与者自传体记忆的指示功能,发现回忆与体育活动相关的自传体记忆与随后的体育活动增加有关。目前的研究采用了一种实验性的重测设计,检验了同样的效果在60岁及以上的成年人样本中是否明显。在时间1,参与者(N = 451)被随机分配到对照组或实验组,并被要求完成一项评估身体活动和健康的调查;实验组被要求回忆与运动有关的积极或消极的动机记忆。参与者(N = 340)在7天后完成了一项类似的调查。在时间1和时间2之间比较运动水平,以检查记忆检索干预是否对身体活动水平有显著影响。记忆状况对时间2体力活动没有显著的主要影响,这表明这种影响可能不适用于老年人。这一无效发现为以下断言提供了支持,即指令功能可能比最初认为的更有限和更具体,其他因素可能对影响行为更重要(例如,与年龄相关的动机差异)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书