Venetoclax, azacitidine, and chidamide in combination with cytarabine, aclarubicin, and G-CSF as induction chemotherapy for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia.

IF 4.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lei Lv, Jingjing Yang, Qingyang Liu, YanFen Li, Lingmin Xu, Meng Li, Ran Zhang, Sai Huang, Yu Jing, Liping Dou
{"title":"Venetoclax, azacitidine, and chidamide in combination with cytarabine, aclarubicin, and G-CSF as induction chemotherapy for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Lei Lv, Jingjing Yang, Qingyang Liu, YanFen Li, Lingmin Xu, Meng Li, Ran Zhang, Sai Huang, Yu Jing, Liping Dou","doi":"10.1007/s10238-026-02200-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MR) exhibits poor outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Venetoclax, Azacitidine, and Chidamide in combination with Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, and G-CSF (CACAG-VEN) regimen in AML-MR patients. We included 14-75-year-old AML-MR patients (n = 30) treated with CACAG-VEN between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. And compared this cohort with patients (n = 30) who received the standard \"3 + 7\" regimen (daunorubicin plus cytarabine) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate(CR) after one cycle of induction. In this retrospective analysis of 30 patients treated with CACAG-VEN, the median age was 50.5 (range, 23-62) years. The CACAG-VEN achieved a high CR (83.3%, 95% CI, 66.4-92.7) and composite complete response (CRc, 93.1% [95% CI, 78.7-98.8]). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and relapse incidences (CIR) were 90.0% (95% CI: 72.1-96.7) and 18.0% (95% CI: 6.4-34.4), respectively. No significant differences in OS (1-year: 85.7% [non-HSCT] vs. 93.8% [HSCT]) or CIR (1-year: 29.3% [non-HSCT] vs. 7.1% [HSCT]) were observed, regardless of whether patients underwent HSCT. The most frequent grade 1-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (73.3%), sepsis (16.7%), and pneumonia (50.0%). The median time to recovery was 16.5 days for platelet counts ≥ 20,000/µL and 20.0 days for absolute neutrophil counts ≥ 1,000 cells/µL after induction therapy. The outcomes in the \"3 + 7\" group were inferior to those of patients who received the CACAG-VEN regimen (CR: 55.7%, p = 0.003; CRc: 56.4%, p = 0.005; 1-year OS: 73.3%, p = 0.039). The CACAG-VEN regimen is a potential frontline therapy for AML-MR, yielding superior response rates and longer survival durations than the standard \"3 + 7\" chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-026-02200-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MR) exhibits poor outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Venetoclax, Azacitidine, and Chidamide in combination with Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, and G-CSF (CACAG-VEN) regimen in AML-MR patients. We included 14-75-year-old AML-MR patients (n = 30) treated with CACAG-VEN between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. And compared this cohort with patients (n = 30) who received the standard "3 + 7" regimen (daunorubicin plus cytarabine) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate(CR) after one cycle of induction. In this retrospective analysis of 30 patients treated with CACAG-VEN, the median age was 50.5 (range, 23-62) years. The CACAG-VEN achieved a high CR (83.3%, 95% CI, 66.4-92.7) and composite complete response (CRc, 93.1% [95% CI, 78.7-98.8]). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and relapse incidences (CIR) were 90.0% (95% CI: 72.1-96.7) and 18.0% (95% CI: 6.4-34.4), respectively. No significant differences in OS (1-year: 85.7% [non-HSCT] vs. 93.8% [HSCT]) or CIR (1-year: 29.3% [non-HSCT] vs. 7.1% [HSCT]) were observed, regardless of whether patients underwent HSCT. The most frequent grade 1-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (73.3%), sepsis (16.7%), and pneumonia (50.0%). The median time to recovery was 16.5 days for platelet counts ≥ 20,000/µL and 20.0 days for absolute neutrophil counts ≥ 1,000 cells/µL after induction therapy. The outcomes in the "3 + 7" group were inferior to those of patients who received the CACAG-VEN regimen (CR: 55.7%, p = 0.003; CRc: 56.4%, p = 0.005; 1-year OS: 73.3%, p = 0.039). The CACAG-VEN regimen is a potential frontline therapy for AML-MR, yielding superior response rates and longer survival durations than the standard "3 + 7" chemotherapy.

Venetoclax、阿扎胞苷和奇达胺联合阿糖胞苷、阿克鲁比星和G-CSF诱导化疗治疗骨髓增生异常相关急性髓性白血病。
骨髓增生异常相关的急性髓性白血病(AML-MR)在强化化疗后表现出较差的预后。本回顾性研究旨在评价Venetoclax、Azacitidine和Chidamide联合阿糖胞苷、阿克拉比星和G-CSF (CACAG-VEN)方案治疗AML-MR患者的临床疗效和安全性。我们纳入了在2023年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间接受CACAG-VEN治疗的14-75岁AML-MR患者(n = 30)。并将该队列与2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日接受标准“3 + 7”方案(柔红霉素+阿糖胞苷)的患者(n = 30)进行比较。主要终点是一个诱导周期后的完全缓解率(CR)。本研究回顾性分析30例CACAG-VEN患者,中位年龄为50.5岁(范围23-62岁)。CACAG-VEN达到了高CR (83.3%, 95% CI, 66.4-92.7)和复合完全缓解(CRc, 93.1% [95% CI, 78.7-98.8])。1年总生存率(OS)和复发率(CIR)分别为90.0% (95% CI: 72.1-96.7)和18.0% (95% CI: 6.4-34.4)。无论患者是否接受了HSCT, OS(1年:85.7%[非HSCT] vs. 93.8% [HSCT])或CIR(1年:29.3%[非HSCT] vs. 7.1% [HSCT])均无显著差异。最常见的1-4级不良事件是发热性中性粒细胞减少症(73.3%)、败血症(16.7%)和肺炎(50.0%)。诱导治疗后,血小板计数≥20,000/µL的中位恢复时间为16.5天,绝对中性粒细胞计数≥1,000细胞/µL的中位恢复时间为20.0天。“3 + 7”组的预后低于CACAG-VEN方案的患者(CR: 55.7%, p = 0.003; CRc: 56.4%, p = 0.005; 1年OS: 73.3%, p = 0.039)。CACAG-VEN方案是AML-MR的潜在一线治疗方案,与标准的“3 + 7”化疗相比,具有更高的缓解率和更长的生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书