Venetoclax, azacitidine, and chidamide in combination with cytarabine, aclarubicin, and G-CSF as induction chemotherapy for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia.
Lei Lv, Jingjing Yang, Qingyang Liu, YanFen Li, Lingmin Xu, Meng Li, Ran Zhang, Sai Huang, Yu Jing, Liping Dou
{"title":"Venetoclax, azacitidine, and chidamide in combination with cytarabine, aclarubicin, and G-CSF as induction chemotherapy for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Lei Lv, Jingjing Yang, Qingyang Liu, YanFen Li, Lingmin Xu, Meng Li, Ran Zhang, Sai Huang, Yu Jing, Liping Dou","doi":"10.1007/s10238-026-02200-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MR) exhibits poor outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Venetoclax, Azacitidine, and Chidamide in combination with Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, and G-CSF (CACAG-VEN) regimen in AML-MR patients. We included 14-75-year-old AML-MR patients (n = 30) treated with CACAG-VEN between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. And compared this cohort with patients (n = 30) who received the standard \"3 + 7\" regimen (daunorubicin plus cytarabine) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate(CR) after one cycle of induction. In this retrospective analysis of 30 patients treated with CACAG-VEN, the median age was 50.5 (range, 23-62) years. The CACAG-VEN achieved a high CR (83.3%, 95% CI, 66.4-92.7) and composite complete response (CRc, 93.1% [95% CI, 78.7-98.8]). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and relapse incidences (CIR) were 90.0% (95% CI: 72.1-96.7) and 18.0% (95% CI: 6.4-34.4), respectively. No significant differences in OS (1-year: 85.7% [non-HSCT] vs. 93.8% [HSCT]) or CIR (1-year: 29.3% [non-HSCT] vs. 7.1% [HSCT]) were observed, regardless of whether patients underwent HSCT. The most frequent grade 1-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (73.3%), sepsis (16.7%), and pneumonia (50.0%). The median time to recovery was 16.5 days for platelet counts ≥ 20,000/µL and 20.0 days for absolute neutrophil counts ≥ 1,000 cells/µL after induction therapy. The outcomes in the \"3 + 7\" group were inferior to those of patients who received the CACAG-VEN regimen (CR: 55.7%, p = 0.003; CRc: 56.4%, p = 0.005; 1-year OS: 73.3%, p = 0.039). The CACAG-VEN regimen is a potential frontline therapy for AML-MR, yielding superior response rates and longer survival durations than the standard \"3 + 7\" chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-026-02200-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MR) exhibits poor outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Venetoclax, Azacitidine, and Chidamide in combination with Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, and G-CSF (CACAG-VEN) regimen in AML-MR patients. We included 14-75-year-old AML-MR patients (n = 30) treated with CACAG-VEN between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. And compared this cohort with patients (n = 30) who received the standard "3 + 7" regimen (daunorubicin plus cytarabine) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate(CR) after one cycle of induction. In this retrospective analysis of 30 patients treated with CACAG-VEN, the median age was 50.5 (range, 23-62) years. The CACAG-VEN achieved a high CR (83.3%, 95% CI, 66.4-92.7) and composite complete response (CRc, 93.1% [95% CI, 78.7-98.8]). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and relapse incidences (CIR) were 90.0% (95% CI: 72.1-96.7) and 18.0% (95% CI: 6.4-34.4), respectively. No significant differences in OS (1-year: 85.7% [non-HSCT] vs. 93.8% [HSCT]) or CIR (1-year: 29.3% [non-HSCT] vs. 7.1% [HSCT]) were observed, regardless of whether patients underwent HSCT. The most frequent grade 1-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (73.3%), sepsis (16.7%), and pneumonia (50.0%). The median time to recovery was 16.5 days for platelet counts ≥ 20,000/µL and 20.0 days for absolute neutrophil counts ≥ 1,000 cells/µL after induction therapy. The outcomes in the "3 + 7" group were inferior to those of patients who received the CACAG-VEN regimen (CR: 55.7%, p = 0.003; CRc: 56.4%, p = 0.005; 1-year OS: 73.3%, p = 0.039). The CACAG-VEN regimen is a potential frontline therapy for AML-MR, yielding superior response rates and longer survival durations than the standard "3 + 7" chemotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.