Women's and Men's Support for Gender Equality Policies in Organizations: From Belief in Gender Discrimination to Perceived Organizational Hypocrisy

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
European Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-03 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1002/ejsp.70058
Joseph Mumbanza Ngeke, Laurent Licata, Claudia Toma
{"title":"Women's and Men's Support for Gender Equality Policies in Organizations: From Belief in Gender Discrimination to Perceived Organizational Hypocrisy","authors":"Joseph Mumbanza Ngeke,&nbsp;Laurent Licata,&nbsp;Claudia Toma","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Belief in gender discrimination is a key predictor of employees’ attitudes toward gender equality policies in organizations. We hypothesized that this belief increases men's support for gender equality policies but decreases women's support due to the perception of organizational hypocrisy. Across three studies—two correlational (<i>N</i> = 420; <i>N</i> = 669) and one experimental (<i>N</i> = 420)—we found evidence for a dual pathway: Among men, stronger belief in gender discrimination was associated with greater support for gender equality policies; among women, the same belief was associated with increased perception of organizational hypocrisy, which, in turn, reduced their support. These findings highlight the importance of fostering men's awareness of gender discrimination while ensuring that organizational efforts are perceived as authentic to maintain women's support.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 4","pages":"641-658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.70058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Belief in gender discrimination is a key predictor of employees’ attitudes toward gender equality policies in organizations. We hypothesized that this belief increases men's support for gender equality policies but decreases women's support due to the perception of organizational hypocrisy. Across three studies—two correlational (N = 420; N = 669) and one experimental (N = 420)—we found evidence for a dual pathway: Among men, stronger belief in gender discrimination was associated with greater support for gender equality policies; among women, the same belief was associated with increased perception of organizational hypocrisy, which, in turn, reduced their support. These findings highlight the importance of fostering men's awareness of gender discrimination while ensuring that organizational efforts are perceived as authentic to maintain women's support.

组织中男女对性别平等政策的支持:从对性别歧视的信念到对组织虚伪的感知
对性别歧视的信念是员工对组织中性别平等政策态度的关键预测因素。我们假设,这种信念增加了男性对性别平等政策的支持,但由于组织虚伪的感知,减少了女性的支持。通过三项研究——两项相关研究(N = 420; N = 669)和一项实验研究(N = 420)——我们发现了双重途径的证据:在男性中,对性别歧视的信念越强,越支持性别平等政策;在女性中,同样的信念与对组织虚伪的感知增加有关,这反过来又减少了她们的支持。这些调查结果突出了培养男子对性别歧视的认识的重要性,同时确保组织的努力被认为是真实的,以保持妇女的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书