Determinants of Glycemic Control Among Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2026-05-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S608364
Salha Otaif, Ghareeb Bahari
{"title":"Determinants of Glycemic Control Among Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Salha Otaif, Ghareeb Bahari","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S608364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Poor glycemic control remains a major challenge and leads to complications among patients with diabetes. In this study, we aimed to identify strategies and factors contributing to improved glycemic control among patients with diabetes in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of 144 adults with diabetes who visited primary healthcare centers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that incorporated validated tools to assess multiple factors of glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 144 participants, only 41.6% achieved optimal HbA1c control, while 58.4% had suboptimal control, including 21.5% with very poor control. Physical activity levels were mostly low to moderate, and two-thirds of the participants reported poor medication adherence. Self-efficacy was moderate, with weaknesses in diet-related confidence. Physical activity was positively correlated with self-efficacy and negatively correlated with medication adherence. Similarly, self-efficacy was negatively associated with medication adherence. Glycemic control was weakly associated with these variables. Regression analysis identified duration since diagnosed with diabetes and medication adherence as significant factors of glycemic control, while self-efficacy and family support were strongly associated with physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Glycemic control among patients with diabetes remains suboptimal. Targeted interventions that strengthen self-care, foster family support, and address behavioral barriers are essential for improving diabetes management and long-term health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"608364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13225148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S608364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Poor glycemic control remains a major challenge and leads to complications among patients with diabetes. In this study, we aimed to identify strategies and factors contributing to improved glycemic control among patients with diabetes in Saudi Arabia.

Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of 144 adults with diabetes who visited primary healthcare centers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that incorporated validated tools to assess multiple factors of glycemic control.

Results: Among the 144 participants, only 41.6% achieved optimal HbA1c control, while 58.4% had suboptimal control, including 21.5% with very poor control. Physical activity levels were mostly low to moderate, and two-thirds of the participants reported poor medication adherence. Self-efficacy was moderate, with weaknesses in diet-related confidence. Physical activity was positively correlated with self-efficacy and negatively correlated with medication adherence. Similarly, self-efficacy was negatively associated with medication adherence. Glycemic control was weakly associated with these variables. Regression analysis identified duration since diagnosed with diabetes and medication adherence as significant factors of glycemic control, while self-efficacy and family support were strongly associated with physical activity.

Conclusion: Glycemic control among patients with diabetes remains suboptimal. Targeted interventions that strengthen self-care, foster family support, and address behavioral barriers are essential for improving diabetes management and long-term health outcomes.

糖尿病患者血糖控制的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
目的:血糖控制不良仍然是糖尿病患者的主要挑战,并导致并发症。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定有助于改善沙特阿拉伯糖尿病患者血糖控制的策略和因素。患者和方法:这项横断面研究使用了144名到初级卫生保健中心就诊的成人糖尿病患者。数据收集采用结构化的问卷调查,包括有效的工具来评估血糖控制的多种因素。结果:144例患者中,仅有41.6%的患者HbA1c控制达到最佳,58.4%的患者控制为次优,其中21.5%的患者控制极差。身体活动水平大多为低至中等,三分之二的参与者报告药物依从性差。自我效能感中等,与饮食相关的自信较弱。体力活动与自我效能正相关,与药物依从性负相关。同样,自我效能感与药物依从性呈负相关。血糖控制与这些变量的相关性较弱。回归分析发现,自诊断为糖尿病的持续时间和药物依从性是血糖控制的重要因素,而自我效能感和家庭支持与身体活动密切相关。结论:糖尿病患者的血糖控制仍不理想。加强自我保健、促进家庭支持和解决行为障碍的有针对性的干预措施对于改善糖尿病管理和长期健康结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书