Restriction of pedicel-flagellum joint in the antennae negatively impacts recruitment but not exploration in ants.

IF 4 1区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Udipta Chakraborti, Snigdha Mukhopadhyay, Sumana Annagiri
{"title":"Restriction of pedicel-flagellum joint in the antennae negatively impacts recruitment but not exploration in ants.","authors":"Udipta Chakraborti, Snigdha Mukhopadhyay, Sumana Annagiri","doi":"10.1186/s40462-026-00663-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The antennal flagellum movement relative to the pedicel, helps insects detect different cues and interpret their surroundings. Antennae play a crucial role in the tandem run recruitment process, where one ant follows another ant to reach the destination by maintaining a continuous physical contact, mostly using antennae, throughout their journey. In this study, we investigate how the restriction in movement of the pedicel-flagellum joint impacts the exploratory walk and recruitment during relocation in Diacamma indicum, a tandem running tropical ponerine ant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied the exploratory walk of ants by examining a total number of 72 individuals from four categories, i.e. no antennae restriction (NR), both antennae restriction (BR), right (RR) or left (LR) antennae restriction. The relocation process was studied by comparing 10 unrestricted and 8 antennae restricted colonies contrasting the dynamics. The movement dynamics of both the individual ants and tandem pairs were examined by analysing their heading direction, speed, sinuosity, straightness, and step lengths.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Restricted ants showed no significant change in speed, path shape and step length in their exploratory walk compared to the unrestricted ants. Restricted colonies performed the relocation at the cost of higher latency and transportation time due to the involvement of comparatively lower numbers of tandem leaders as compared to unrestricted colonies. Irrespective of restriction status, all the tandem pairs were significantly oriented toward the new nest. From the leader's point of view, BR leaders showed lower speed, more winding paths and higher proportion of small steps in comparison to unrestricted tandem pairs, while RR leaders hardly became tandem leaders. From the follower's point of view, RR and BR followers showed significantly lower speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the restriction in the pedicel-flagellum joint has no impact on the exploration walk in ants but negatively impacts the relocation process by affecting the tandem run recruitment. In the next step, it is essential to understand the functionality of the pedicel-flagellum joint and how ants compensate for loss of information from a sensory modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":54288,"journal":{"name":"Movement Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13248242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-026-00663-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The antennal flagellum movement relative to the pedicel, helps insects detect different cues and interpret their surroundings. Antennae play a crucial role in the tandem run recruitment process, where one ant follows another ant to reach the destination by maintaining a continuous physical contact, mostly using antennae, throughout their journey. In this study, we investigate how the restriction in movement of the pedicel-flagellum joint impacts the exploratory walk and recruitment during relocation in Diacamma indicum, a tandem running tropical ponerine ant.

Methods: We studied the exploratory walk of ants by examining a total number of 72 individuals from four categories, i.e. no antennae restriction (NR), both antennae restriction (BR), right (RR) or left (LR) antennae restriction. The relocation process was studied by comparing 10 unrestricted and 8 antennae restricted colonies contrasting the dynamics. The movement dynamics of both the individual ants and tandem pairs were examined by analysing their heading direction, speed, sinuosity, straightness, and step lengths.

Result: Restricted ants showed no significant change in speed, path shape and step length in their exploratory walk compared to the unrestricted ants. Restricted colonies performed the relocation at the cost of higher latency and transportation time due to the involvement of comparatively lower numbers of tandem leaders as compared to unrestricted colonies. Irrespective of restriction status, all the tandem pairs were significantly oriented toward the new nest. From the leader's point of view, BR leaders showed lower speed, more winding paths and higher proportion of small steps in comparison to unrestricted tandem pairs, while RR leaders hardly became tandem leaders. From the follower's point of view, RR and BR followers showed significantly lower speed.

Conclusion: This study showed that the restriction in the pedicel-flagellum joint has no impact on the exploration walk in ants but negatively impacts the relocation process by affecting the tandem run recruitment. In the next step, it is essential to understand the functionality of the pedicel-flagellum joint and how ants compensate for loss of information from a sensory modality.

触角中花梗-鞭毛关节的限制对蚂蚁的招募产生负面影响,但对探索没有负面影响。
背景:触角鞭毛的运动相对于花梗,帮助昆虫发现不同的线索和解释他们的周围环境。触角在串联招募过程中起着至关重要的作用,在串联招募过程中,一只蚂蚁跟随另一只蚂蚁到达目的地,在整个过程中保持连续的身体接触,主要使用触角。在这项研究中,我们研究了热带双翅蚁(Diacamma indicum)在搬迁过程中,花梗-鞭毛关节运动的限制如何影响其探索性行走和招募。方法:采用无触角限制(NR)、双触角限制(BR)、右触角限制(RR)和左触角限制(LR) 4类共72只蚂蚁对蚂蚁的探索性行走进行研究。通过10个不受限制菌落和8个受天线限制菌落的动态对比,研究了蚁群的迁移过程。通过分析蚁群的前进方向、速度、弯曲度、直线度和步长,研究了蚁群的运动动力学。结果:与不受限制的蚂蚁相比,受限制的蚂蚁在探索行走的速度、路径形状和步长方面没有显著变化。与不受限制的蚁群相比,受限制的蚁群参与串联蚁群的数量相对较少,从而以更高的延迟和运输时间为代价进行迁移。无论限制状态如何,所有的串联对都明显地朝向新巢。从领导者的角度来看,与不受限制的串联组相比,BR的领导者表现出更低的速度、更多的曲折路径和更高的小步比例,而RR的领导者几乎没有成为串联领导者。从追随者的角度来看,RR和BR追随者的速度明显较低。结论:本研究表明,对蚂蚁的探索行走没有影响,但通过影响串联跑动的招募,对蚂蚁的迁移过程产生负面影响。下一步,有必要了解蒂-鞭毛关节的功能,以及蚂蚁如何补偿从感官形态中丢失的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement Ecology
Movement Ecology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
47
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Movement Ecology is an open-access interdisciplinary journal publishing novel insights from empirical and theoretical approaches into the ecology of movement of the whole organism - either animals, plants or microorganisms - as the central theme. We welcome manuscripts on any taxa and any movement phenomena (e.g. foraging, dispersal and seasonal migration) addressing important research questions on the patterns, mechanisms, causes and consequences of organismal movement. Manuscripts will be rigorously peer-reviewed to ensure novelty and high quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书