Endoscopic versus open flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon rupture: A prospective randomized pilot trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Abdelrahman Abdelsalam Afifi, Ayman Ibrahim Fathy Hewaidy, Ossama AbdelRaof El Shazly, Amr Farouk, Awab Ali Mousa Elaslaby, Mahmoud Ahmed Gamal, Mohamed Ahmed El Mowafi
{"title":"Endoscopic versus open flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon rupture: A prospective randomized pilot trial.","authors":"Abdelrahman Abdelsalam Afifi, Ayman Ibrahim Fathy Hewaidy, Ossama AbdelRaof El Shazly, Amr Farouk, Awab Ali Mousa Elaslaby, Mahmoud Ahmed Gamal, Mohamed Ahmed El Mowafi","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2026.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Achilles tendon rupture often requires surgical reconstruction. Flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer is widely used, and endoscopic techniques may reduce soft-tissue morbidity and facilitate early recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture were randomized to undergo open or endoscopic FHL tendon transfer. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) over 18 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time and wound complications. Exploratory outcomes included postoperative pain assessed by visual analog scale (VAS), duration of analgesic use, and time to return to work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FAAM scores improved significantly in both groups over time (P < .001), with no significant difference between techniques at final follow-up (P = .487). Operative time was significantly longer in the endoscopic group (P < .001). Wound complications occurred only in the open group, affecting 5 of 15 patients (33.3%). Endoscopic reconstruction was associated with shorter duration of analgesic use (P = .007) and earlier return to work (P = .013). VAS pain scores decreased significantly in both groups with no significant between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both open and endoscopic FHL tendon transfer provided excellent functional outcomes in the management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture. The endoscopic technique was associated with fewer wound complications and improved early postoperative recovery, despite longer operative time.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, randomized controlled trial (pilot).</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2026.05.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Achilles tendon rupture often requires surgical reconstruction. Flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer is widely used, and endoscopic techniques may reduce soft-tissue morbidity and facilitate early recovery.

Methods: Thirty patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture were randomized to undergo open or endoscopic FHL tendon transfer. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) over 18 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time and wound complications. Exploratory outcomes included postoperative pain assessed by visual analog scale (VAS), duration of analgesic use, and time to return to work.

Results: FAAM scores improved significantly in both groups over time (P < .001), with no significant difference between techniques at final follow-up (P = .487). Operative time was significantly longer in the endoscopic group (P < .001). Wound complications occurred only in the open group, affecting 5 of 15 patients (33.3%). Endoscopic reconstruction was associated with shorter duration of analgesic use (P = .007) and earlier return to work (P = .013). VAS pain scores decreased significantly in both groups with no significant between-group differences.

Conclusions: Both open and endoscopic FHL tendon transfer provided excellent functional outcomes in the management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture. The endoscopic technique was associated with fewer wound complications and improved early postoperative recovery, despite longer operative time.

Level of evidence: Level II, randomized controlled trial (pilot).

内窥镜下与开放式拇长屈肌腱转移重建慢性跟腱断裂:一项前瞻性随机试验。
背景:慢性跟腱断裂通常需要手术重建。拇长屈肌(FHL)肌腱转移被广泛应用,内窥镜技术可以减少软组织发病率并促进早期恢复。方法:30例慢性跟腱断裂患者随机分为开放或内镜下FHL肌腱转移。在18个月的时间里,使用足部和踝关节能力量表(FAAM)评估功能结果。次要结果包括手术时间和伤口并发症。探索性结果包括通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后疼痛、镇痛药使用时间和重返工作岗位的时间。结果:随着时间的推移,两组患者的FAAM评分均有显著提高(P )。结论:开放式和内窥镜下FHL肌腱移植在治疗慢性跟腱断裂方面均提供了良好的功能结果。尽管手术时间较长,但内镜技术与较少的伤口并发症和术后早期恢复有关。证据等级:二级,随机对照试验(试点)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书