Electroencephalography Microstate Instability and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis.

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Matthias Liebrand, Holly K Hamilton, Brian J Roach, Spero Nicholas, Peter M Bachman, Aysenil Belger, Ricardo E Carrión, Erica Duncan, Jason K Johannesen, Gregory A Light, Margaret A Niznikiewicz, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Kristin S Cadenhead, Diana O Perkins, William S Stone, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods, Tyrone D Cannon, Thomas Koenig, Daniel H Mathalon
{"title":"Electroencephalography Microstate Instability and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis.","authors":"Matthias Liebrand, Holly K Hamilton, Brian J Roach, Spero Nicholas, Peter M Bachman, Aysenil Belger, Ricardo E Carrión, Erica Duncan, Jason K Johannesen, Gregory A Light, Margaret A Niznikiewicz, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Kristin S Cadenhead, Diana O Perkins, William S Stone, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods, Tyrone D Cannon, Thomas Koenig, Daniel H Mathalon","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.1084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Clinical criteria for identifying individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR) have been established, but their predictive accuracy remains insufficient for guiding treatment decisions. Identifying reliable biomarkers associated with mechanisms of illness and treatment in individuals at CHR is therefore a central research goal. Here, we consider resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) microstates as such a potential biomarker.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether EEG microstate features are associated with future conversion to psychosis and other future clinical outcomes in individuals at CHR.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Baseline EEG microstate data were collected from October 2009 through August 2014 as part of the 8-site case-control North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study-2 (NAPLS-2) during eyes-open resting-state conditions with continuous auditory white noise. Data were recorded from healthy control (HC) individuals and participants at CHR, including those at CHR with conversion to psychosis (CHR-C) and those with nonconversion (CHR-NC), followed up for 24 months. Individuals with CHR-NC were further divided into those with remission (CHR-R) or those with ongoing symptomatology (CHR-S) subgroups. A total of 241 individuals at CHR (52.4%) completed the full 24-month follow-up. Data were analyzed between January and November 2025.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Resting-state EEG microstate features (coverage, duration, and occurrence) across 7 distinct microstate classes, along with cognitive test battery scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with HC participants (n = 183; 103 [56.3%] male; mean [SD] age, 20.2 [5.0] years), individuals at CHR (n = 460; 265 [57.6%] male; mean [SD] age, 19.2 [4.4] years) showed reduced microstate duration (Cohen d, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.49) and increased occurrence (Cohen d, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.21) across classes, reflecting reduced microstate temporal stability. Moreover, individuals with CHR-C (n = 56) exhibited greater instability than those with CHR-R (n = 70) and HC participants but not compared to those with CHR-S (n = 115). Within the CHR group, lower stability was associated with earlier conversion to psychosis and with increased positive symptoms. While individuals at CHR demonstrated cognitive deficits relative to HC participants, including attention scores, lower microstate stability was associated with better attention scores in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, EEG microstate stability, irrespective of class, was reduced in individuals at CHR compared to HC participants and was especially diminished in future CHR converters. The association between lower stability and better attention suggests that instability may at least partly reflect a compensatory mechanism for attention deficits. EEG microstate instability shows promise as a prognostic biomarker of clinical outcome in CHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"837-846"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13234755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.1084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Clinical criteria for identifying individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR) have been established, but their predictive accuracy remains insufficient for guiding treatment decisions. Identifying reliable biomarkers associated with mechanisms of illness and treatment in individuals at CHR is therefore a central research goal. Here, we consider resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) microstates as such a potential biomarker.

Objective: To determine whether EEG microstate features are associated with future conversion to psychosis and other future clinical outcomes in individuals at CHR.

Design, setting, and participants: Baseline EEG microstate data were collected from October 2009 through August 2014 as part of the 8-site case-control North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study-2 (NAPLS-2) during eyes-open resting-state conditions with continuous auditory white noise. Data were recorded from healthy control (HC) individuals and participants at CHR, including those at CHR with conversion to psychosis (CHR-C) and those with nonconversion (CHR-NC), followed up for 24 months. Individuals with CHR-NC were further divided into those with remission (CHR-R) or those with ongoing symptomatology (CHR-S) subgroups. A total of 241 individuals at CHR (52.4%) completed the full 24-month follow-up. Data were analyzed between January and November 2025.

Main outcomes and measures: Resting-state EEG microstate features (coverage, duration, and occurrence) across 7 distinct microstate classes, along with cognitive test battery scores.

Results: Compared with HC participants (n = 183; 103 [56.3%] male; mean [SD] age, 20.2 [5.0] years), individuals at CHR (n = 460; 265 [57.6%] male; mean [SD] age, 19.2 [4.4] years) showed reduced microstate duration (Cohen d, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.49) and increased occurrence (Cohen d, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.21) across classes, reflecting reduced microstate temporal stability. Moreover, individuals with CHR-C (n = 56) exhibited greater instability than those with CHR-R (n = 70) and HC participants but not compared to those with CHR-S (n = 115). Within the CHR group, lower stability was associated with earlier conversion to psychosis and with increased positive symptoms. While individuals at CHR demonstrated cognitive deficits relative to HC participants, including attention scores, lower microstate stability was associated with better attention scores in both groups.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, EEG microstate stability, irrespective of class, was reduced in individuals at CHR compared to HC participants and was especially diminished in future CHR converters. The association between lower stability and better attention suggests that instability may at least partly reflect a compensatory mechanism for attention deficits. EEG microstate instability shows promise as a prognostic biomarker of clinical outcome in CHR.

临床精神病高危人群的脑电图微状态不稳定性和临床结果。
重要性:已经建立了识别临床精神病高危个体的临床标准,但其预测准确性仍然不足以指导治疗决策。因此,在CHR个体中确定与疾病机制和治疗相关的可靠生物标志物是一个中心研究目标。在这里,我们考虑静息状态脑电图(EEG)微状态作为这样一个潜在的生物标志物。目的:确定脑电图微状态特征是否与CHR患者未来转化为精神病和其他未来临床结果相关。设计、环境和参与者:基线EEG微状态数据收集自2009年10月至2014年8月,作为8点病例对照的北美前瞻症状纵向研究-2 (NAPLS-2)的一部分,在持续听觉白噪声的睁眼静息状态条件下。记录健康对照(HC)个体和CHR参与者的数据,包括在CHR转化为精神病的个体(chrc)和未转化为精神病的个体(chrc - nc),随访24个月。cr - nc患者进一步分为缓解组(cr - r)和持续症状组(cr - s)。CHR共有241人(52.4%)完成了24个月的随访。研究人员分析了2025年1月至11月之间的数据。主要结果和测量:静息状态EEG微状态特征(覆盖范围、持续时间和发生)跨越7个不同的微状态类别,以及认知测试电池得分。结果:与HC参与者(n = 183; 103[56.3%]男性;平均[SD]年龄,20.2[5.0]岁)相比,CHR个体(n = 460; 265[57.6%]男性;平均[SD]年龄,19.2[4.4]岁)的微状态持续时间缩短(Cohen d, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07至0.49),不同类别的发生率增加(Cohen d, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03至0.21),反映了微状态时间稳定性降低。此外,chrc - c患者(n = 56)比chrr - r (n = 70)和HC患者表现出更大的不稳定性,但与chrr - s患者(n = 115)相比则没有。在CHR组中,较低的稳定性与早期转化为精神病和阳性症状增加有关。虽然CHR组的个体表现出相对于HC组的认知缺陷,包括注意力得分,但两组中较低的微观状态稳定性与较高的注意力得分相关。结论和相关性:在本研究中,与HC参与者相比,CHR个体的脑电图微状态稳定性(不论类别)降低,特别是在未来的CHR转换者中。较低的稳定性和较好的注意力之间的联系表明,不稳定性可能至少部分地反映了注意力缺陷的补偿机制。脑电图微状态不稳定性有望作为CHR临床结果的预后生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书