Updated algorithms for direct and indirect mapping of WHOQOL-BREF to EQ-5D-5L utility scores using data from a multi-provincial Thai general population sample.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul, Yi Jing Tan
{"title":"Updated algorithms for direct and indirect mapping of WHOQOL-BREF to EQ-5D-5L utility scores using data from a multi-provincial Thai general population sample.","authors":"Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul, Yi Jing Tan","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02558-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mapping techniques can estimate EQ-5D-5L utility scores from non-preference-based WHOQOL-BREF responses. A previous Thai study used a reciprocal linear model, but it may not adequately address the left-skewed distribution of utility scores. This study aimed to develop improved mapping algorithms using alternative regression models that better account for the distributional characteristics of utility scores in the Thai general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2022 national survey dataset of paired WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D-5L responses (n = 2,000), representative of the Thai general population, was used. Five predictor sets were fitted using eight regression models, including ordinary least squares, Tobit, censored least absolute deviations, generalized linear model (GLM), two-part models, adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model, and beta regression-based mixture model for the direct mapping approach; and multinomial logistic regression (MLOGIT) for the indirect mapping approach. The best-performing models were identified based on the lowest ten-fold cross-validated mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE), together with minimal prediction bias from graphical assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GLM-poisson model, fitted using a predictor set comprising age, general WHOQOL-BREF items, and selected Physical Health, Psychological Health and Environment items, emerged as the best-performing model, with predictions closely aligning with observed values. A MLOGIT model performed less well, with overpredictions for utility scores > 0.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study advances the literature on mapping WHOQOL-BREF to EQ-5D-5L by providing updated algorithms for estimating EQ-5D-5L utility scores from WHOQOL-BREF responses in the Thai general population. The improved algorithms offer more accurate predictions, supporting their use in health economic analyses in Thailand.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02558-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mapping techniques can estimate EQ-5D-5L utility scores from non-preference-based WHOQOL-BREF responses. A previous Thai study used a reciprocal linear model, but it may not adequately address the left-skewed distribution of utility scores. This study aimed to develop improved mapping algorithms using alternative regression models that better account for the distributional characteristics of utility scores in the Thai general population.

Methods: A 2022 national survey dataset of paired WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D-5L responses (n = 2,000), representative of the Thai general population, was used. Five predictor sets were fitted using eight regression models, including ordinary least squares, Tobit, censored least absolute deviations, generalized linear model (GLM), two-part models, adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model, and beta regression-based mixture model for the direct mapping approach; and multinomial logistic regression (MLOGIT) for the indirect mapping approach. The best-performing models were identified based on the lowest ten-fold cross-validated mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE), together with minimal prediction bias from graphical assessment.

Results: The GLM-poisson model, fitted using a predictor set comprising age, general WHOQOL-BREF items, and selected Physical Health, Psychological Health and Environment items, emerged as the best-performing model, with predictions closely aligning with observed values. A MLOGIT model performed less well, with overpredictions for utility scores > 0.6.

Conclusions: This study advances the literature on mapping WHOQOL-BREF to EQ-5D-5L by providing updated algorithms for estimating EQ-5D-5L utility scores from WHOQOL-BREF responses in the Thai general population. The improved algorithms offer more accurate predictions, supporting their use in health economic analyses in Thailand.

使用来自泰国多省一般人群样本的数据,更新了WHOQOL-BREF与EQ-5D-5L效用评分直接和间接映射的算法。
背景:映射技术可以从非基于偏好的WHOQOL-BREF响应中估计EQ-5D-5L效用得分。泰国先前的一项研究使用了倒数线性模型,但它可能无法充分解决效用得分的左偏分布。本研究旨在利用替代回归模型开发改进的映射算法,以更好地解释泰国普通人群中效用得分的分布特征。方法:使用2022年全国调查数据集,配对WHOQOL-BREF和EQ-5D-5L应答(n = 2000),代表泰国普通人群。采用普通最小二乘、Tobit、删减最小绝对偏差、广义线性模型(GLM)、两部分模型、调整有限因变量混合模型和直接映射方法的基于β回归的混合模型等8种回归模型拟合5个预测集;间接映射方法采用多项逻辑回归(MLOGIT)。最佳表现的模型是基于最低的十倍交叉验证平均绝对误差(MAE)和均方根误差(RMSE),以及最小的图形评估预测偏差来确定的。结果:GLM-poisson模型使用包括年龄,一般WHOQOL-BREF项目以及选定的身体健康,心理健康和环境项目的预测集进行拟合,成为表现最佳的模型,预测与观测值密切一致。MLOGIT模型表现得不太好,对效用得分的预测过高。结论:本研究通过提供从泰国普通人群WHOQOL-BREF反应中估计EQ-5D-5L效用评分的更新算法,推进了将WHOQOL-BREF映射到EQ-5D-5L的文献。改进后的算法提供了更准确的预测,支持将其用于泰国的卫生经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书