Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: An Australian Sample

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2025.12.030
Pasangi Madhuka Wijayarathne MD, Samuel Menahem MD, DMedHSc
{"title":"Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: An Australian Sample","authors":"Pasangi Madhuka Wijayarathne MD,&nbsp;Samuel Menahem MD, DMedHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.12.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) now survive well into adulthood though their overall long-term survival remains below the general population. Advance care planning (ACP) has been endorsed by clinical guidelines, yet it is infrequently discussed and/or implemented.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>As part of an international multicentre APPROACH-IS II study, 184 consecutive ACHD patients completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions on the future and ACP.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 88 males and 96 females in the study. The mean age was 29.4±8.94 years. The mean score for future health concern was 5.83±2.55, (0=no concerns, 10=extreme concern). Concern regarding future health was associated with NYHA Class (p&lt;0.001), the average score of concern increasing with increasing NYHA Class. Forty-five percent of participants were aware of processes around advance care directives and plans, but only 4% had documented their wishes. There was no association between documentation and concerns regarding future health, or NYHA class. Sixty-nine percent of patients agreed that ACP should occur when patients are well. However, only 51% of patients had discussed their future health with their clinicians. Only 8% and 24% of patients were uncomfortable discussing their future health and death respectively. No information was obtained about how comfortable the cardiologists were about discussing ACP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is limited understanding of ACP among ACHD patients. Although most patients accept the value of ACP early in the patient’s clinical course, few in this Australian sample documented their end-of-life care wishes. Further education of both ACHD patients and their attending clinicians toward initiating these sensitive discussions of ACP may lead to more patients documenting their wishes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":"35 9","pages":"Pages 1357-1365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144395062600096X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) now survive well into adulthood though their overall long-term survival remains below the general population. Advance care planning (ACP) has been endorsed by clinical guidelines, yet it is infrequently discussed and/or implemented.

Methods

As part of an international multicentre APPROACH-IS II study, 184 consecutive ACHD patients completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions on the future and ACP.

Results

There were 88 males and 96 females in the study. The mean age was 29.4±8.94 years. The mean score for future health concern was 5.83±2.55, (0=no concerns, 10=extreme concern). Concern regarding future health was associated with NYHA Class (p<0.001), the average score of concern increasing with increasing NYHA Class. Forty-five percent of participants were aware of processes around advance care directives and plans, but only 4% had documented their wishes. There was no association between documentation and concerns regarding future health, or NYHA class. Sixty-nine percent of patients agreed that ACP should occur when patients are well. However, only 51% of patients had discussed their future health with their clinicians. Only 8% and 24% of patients were uncomfortable discussing their future health and death respectively. No information was obtained about how comfortable the cardiologists were about discussing ACP.

Conclusions

There is limited understanding of ACP among ACHD patients. Although most patients accept the value of ACP early in the patient’s clinical course, few in this Australian sample documented their end-of-life care wishes. Further education of both ACHD patients and their attending clinicians toward initiating these sensitive discussions of ACP may lead to more patients documenting their wishes.
成人先天性心脏病预先护理计划的观点:一个澳大利亚样本。
成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者现在可以很好地存活到成年,尽管他们的总体长期生存率仍然低于一般人群。预先护理计划(ACP)已得到临床指南的认可,但很少被讨论和/或实施。方法:作为国际多中心APPROACH-IS II研究的一部分,184名连续的ACHD患者完成了一份关于他们对未来和ACP的看法的问卷调查。结果:男性88例,女性96例。平均年龄29.4±8.94岁。对未来健康担忧的平均得分为5.83±2.55,(0=无担忧,10=极度担忧)。对未来健康的担忧与NYHA分级相关(结论:ACHD患者对ACP的了解有限。尽管大多数患者在临床过程的早期就接受了ACP的价值,但在这个澳大利亚样本中,很少有人记录下他们的临终关怀愿望。对ACHD患者和他们的主治医生进行进一步的教育,以启动ACP这些敏感的讨论,可能会导致更多的患者记录他们的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书