{"title":"Reporting Intimate Partner Violence at the Intersection of Race and Citizenship.","authors":"Kristen M Fite","doi":"10.1177/08862605261451873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the impact of citizenship status and racial and ethnic identity of a victim on the likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV) being reported to the police in the United States. Using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (2017-2023), the current study estimated multinomial logistic regression models to analyze both victim-reporting and third-party reporting patterns across different citizenship and racial and ethnic groups. Findings indicated that noncitizens of a racial/ethnic minority background were significantly more likely to report their victimization experiences compared to White, non-Hispanic U.S. citizens. Additionally, third-party reporting of victimization was less common for racial/ethnic minority noncitizens, while noncitizen White, non-Hispanic victims exhibited the lowest rates of victim reporting. Factors such as injury severity, weapon presence, income level, disability status, and help-seeking from victim service agencies were significant predictors of reporting behavior. The study also explored the reasons victims choose to report or not report their experiences, finding that concerns over privacy, fear of reprisal, and protecting the offender are key deterrents, whereas preventing future harm and seeking immediate assistance drive reporting decisions. Theoretical implications suggest that for minority noncitizens, formal help-seeking methods like police reporting may not only be more accessible than informal support networks but also perceived as the best or only viable pathway to safety. This underscores the importance of accessibility and culturally competent practices in law enforcement, as negative experiences with formal systems may close off the only perceived route to safety and justice for these survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"7276-7302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261451873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the impact of citizenship status and racial and ethnic identity of a victim on the likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV) being reported to the police in the United States. Using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (2017-2023), the current study estimated multinomial logistic regression models to analyze both victim-reporting and third-party reporting patterns across different citizenship and racial and ethnic groups. Findings indicated that noncitizens of a racial/ethnic minority background were significantly more likely to report their victimization experiences compared to White, non-Hispanic U.S. citizens. Additionally, third-party reporting of victimization was less common for racial/ethnic minority noncitizens, while noncitizen White, non-Hispanic victims exhibited the lowest rates of victim reporting. Factors such as injury severity, weapon presence, income level, disability status, and help-seeking from victim service agencies were significant predictors of reporting behavior. The study also explored the reasons victims choose to report or not report their experiences, finding that concerns over privacy, fear of reprisal, and protecting the offender are key deterrents, whereas preventing future harm and seeking immediate assistance drive reporting decisions. Theoretical implications suggest that for minority noncitizens, formal help-seeking methods like police reporting may not only be more accessible than informal support networks but also perceived as the best or only viable pathway to safety. This underscores the importance of accessibility and culturally competent practices in law enforcement, as negative experiences with formal systems may close off the only perceived route to safety and justice for these survivors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.