Reporting Intimate Partner Violence at the Intersection of Race and Citizenship.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Journal of Interpersonal Violence Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1177/08862605261451873
Kristen M Fite
{"title":"Reporting Intimate Partner Violence at the Intersection of Race and Citizenship.","authors":"Kristen M Fite","doi":"10.1177/08862605261451873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the impact of citizenship status and racial and ethnic identity of a victim on the likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV) being reported to the police in the United States. Using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (2017-2023), the current study estimated multinomial logistic regression models to analyze both victim-reporting and third-party reporting patterns across different citizenship and racial and ethnic groups. Findings indicated that noncitizens of a racial/ethnic minority background were significantly more likely to report their victimization experiences compared to White, non-Hispanic U.S. citizens. Additionally, third-party reporting of victimization was less common for racial/ethnic minority noncitizens, while noncitizen White, non-Hispanic victims exhibited the lowest rates of victim reporting. Factors such as injury severity, weapon presence, income level, disability status, and help-seeking from victim service agencies were significant predictors of reporting behavior. The study also explored the reasons victims choose to report or not report their experiences, finding that concerns over privacy, fear of reprisal, and protecting the offender are key deterrents, whereas preventing future harm and seeking immediate assistance drive reporting decisions. Theoretical implications suggest that for minority noncitizens, formal help-seeking methods like police reporting may not only be more accessible than informal support networks but also perceived as the best or only viable pathway to safety. This underscores the importance of accessibility and culturally competent practices in law enforcement, as negative experiences with formal systems may close off the only perceived route to safety and justice for these survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"7276-7302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261451873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the impact of citizenship status and racial and ethnic identity of a victim on the likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV) being reported to the police in the United States. Using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (2017-2023), the current study estimated multinomial logistic regression models to analyze both victim-reporting and third-party reporting patterns across different citizenship and racial and ethnic groups. Findings indicated that noncitizens of a racial/ethnic minority background were significantly more likely to report their victimization experiences compared to White, non-Hispanic U.S. citizens. Additionally, third-party reporting of victimization was less common for racial/ethnic minority noncitizens, while noncitizen White, non-Hispanic victims exhibited the lowest rates of victim reporting. Factors such as injury severity, weapon presence, income level, disability status, and help-seeking from victim service agencies were significant predictors of reporting behavior. The study also explored the reasons victims choose to report or not report their experiences, finding that concerns over privacy, fear of reprisal, and protecting the offender are key deterrents, whereas preventing future harm and seeking immediate assistance drive reporting decisions. Theoretical implications suggest that for minority noncitizens, formal help-seeking methods like police reporting may not only be more accessible than informal support networks but also perceived as the best or only viable pathway to safety. This underscores the importance of accessibility and culturally competent practices in law enforcement, as negative experiences with formal systems may close off the only perceived route to safety and justice for these survivors.

在种族和公民身份的交叉点报道亲密伴侣暴力。
本研究探讨了公民身份和受害者的种族和民族身份对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)向美国警方报案的可能性的影响。利用2017-2023年国家犯罪受害调查的数据,本研究估计了多项逻辑回归模型,以分析不同公民身份、种族和族裔群体的受害者报告和第三方报告模式。研究结果表明,与白人、非西班牙裔美国公民相比,少数种族/族裔背景的非公民更有可能报告他们的受害经历。此外,非公民种族/少数民族受害者的第三方受害报告较少,而非公民白人,非西班牙裔受害者的受害报告率最低。诸如伤害严重程度、武器存在、收入水平、残疾状况和向受害者服务机构寻求帮助等因素是报告行为的重要预测因素。该研究还探讨了受害者选择报告或不报告其经历的原因,发现对隐私的担忧、对报复的恐惧和保护犯罪者是主要的威慑因素,而防止未来的伤害和寻求立即援助是决定报告的原因。理论意义表明,对于少数非公民来说,像警察报告这样的正式寻求帮助的方法不仅比非正式的支持网络更容易获得,而且被认为是通往安全的最佳或唯一可行途径。这凸显了无障碍环境和执法中具有文化能力的做法的重要性,因为对正规制度的负面经历可能会关闭这些幸存者通往安全和正义的唯一途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书