Consecutive Esotropia Following Exotropia Surgery: Possible Risk Factors, Changes in the Angle of Deviation, and Esotropia Rates.

IF 0.9
Beyoglu Eye Journal Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/bej.2026.82698
Nazife Sefi-Yurdakul
{"title":"Consecutive Esotropia Following Exotropia Surgery: Possible Risk Factors, Changes in the Angle of Deviation, and Esotropia Rates.","authors":"Nazife Sefi-Yurdakul","doi":"10.14744/bej.2026.82698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the risk factors associated with consecutive esotropia, as well as the changes in deviation angle and the prevalence of esotropia in patients who underwent surgery for exotropia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients with basic-type exotropia who underwent either bilateral lateral rectus recession (symmetric surgery) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection (asymmetric surgery), and who were followed for at least one year, were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative findings were analyzed for both groups: symmetric surgery (Group 1) and asymmetric surgery (Group 2). Consecutive esotropia was defined as ≥5 prism diopters of esotropia at either distance or near fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 114 patients included, 52 (46%) were female and 62 (54%) were male. The mean age at surgery was 20.42 years in Group 1 and 15.59 years in Group 2 (p>0.05). Group 2 had significantly lower visual acuity, stereopsis, and fusion rates, and higher rates of amblyopia and anisometropia compared to Group 1. At the final follow-up examination, the deviation angles decreased significantly in both groups (p<0.001), and the prevalence of consecutive esotropia reduced from 17% to 7% in Group 1 and from 30% to 19% in Group 2 (p=0.031). While stereopsis did not significantly improve postoperatively in Group 1, increased significantly in Group 2 (p=0.031). Fusion improved significantly in both groups (p<0.001). Refractive error, anisometropia, preoperative and early postoperative deviation angles, and the extent of surgery were identified as significant risk factors for consecutive esotropia (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although initial overcorrection following exotropia surgery tends to decrease over time, patients with high preoperative and early postoperative deviation angles, high refractive errors, anisometropia, and greater surgical amounts should be carefully monitored for the development of consecutive esotropia.</p>","PeriodicalId":8740,"journal":{"name":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13223692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2026.82698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the risk factors associated with consecutive esotropia, as well as the changes in deviation angle and the prevalence of esotropia in patients who underwent surgery for exotropia.

Methods: The records of patients with basic-type exotropia who underwent either bilateral lateral rectus recession (symmetric surgery) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection (asymmetric surgery), and who were followed for at least one year, were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative findings were analyzed for both groups: symmetric surgery (Group 1) and asymmetric surgery (Group 2). Consecutive esotropia was defined as ≥5 prism diopters of esotropia at either distance or near fixation.

Results: Of the 114 patients included, 52 (46%) were female and 62 (54%) were male. The mean age at surgery was 20.42 years in Group 1 and 15.59 years in Group 2 (p>0.05). Group 2 had significantly lower visual acuity, stereopsis, and fusion rates, and higher rates of amblyopia and anisometropia compared to Group 1. At the final follow-up examination, the deviation angles decreased significantly in both groups (p<0.001), and the prevalence of consecutive esotropia reduced from 17% to 7% in Group 1 and from 30% to 19% in Group 2 (p=0.031). While stereopsis did not significantly improve postoperatively in Group 1, increased significantly in Group 2 (p=0.031). Fusion improved significantly in both groups (p<0.001). Refractive error, anisometropia, preoperative and early postoperative deviation angles, and the extent of surgery were identified as significant risk factors for consecutive esotropia (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Although initial overcorrection following exotropia surgery tends to decrease over time, patients with high preoperative and early postoperative deviation angles, high refractive errors, anisometropia, and greater surgical amounts should be carefully monitored for the development of consecutive esotropia.

外斜视手术后的连续内斜视:可能的危险因素,斜视角度的变化和内斜视发生率。
目的:评价连续内斜视的相关危险因素,以及手术治疗外斜视患者内斜视角度的变化和内斜视的患病率。方法:回顾性分析接受双侧侧直肌收缩术(对称手术)或单侧侧直肌收缩术联合内侧直肌切除术(不对称手术)随访1年以上的基本型外斜视患者的资料。分析两组术前、术后早期和术后后期的结果:对称手术(1组)和非对称手术(2组)。连续内斜视定义为在远处或近固定处的内斜视屈光度≥5棱镜。结果:114例患者中,女性52例(46%),男性62例(54%)。1组患者平均手术年龄20.42岁,2组患者平均手术年龄15.59岁(p < 0.05)。与第1组相比,第2组的视力、立体视和融合率明显较低,弱视和屈光参差率较高。在最后的随访检查中,两组患者的斜视角度均明显下降(p结论:尽管随着时间的推移,外斜视手术后的初始过度矫正有减少的趋势,但术前和术后早期高度斜视、高度屈光不正、屈光参差和较大手术量的患者应仔细监测其是否发生连续内斜视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书