Venous thromboembolic events in traumatic brain injury. Does timing of prophylaxis matter? A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Q3 Medicine
Nicholas Hernandez, Avery Christensen, Marissa Shumaker, Colby McClaugherty, Asad Danka, Michael P Hofkamp, Awais Z Vance
{"title":"Venous thromboembolic events in traumatic brain injury. Does timing of prophylaxis matter? A single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Nicholas Hernandez, Avery Christensen, Marissa Shumaker, Colby McClaugherty, Asad Danka, Michael P Hofkamp, Awais Z Vance","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2026.2677108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to immobilization and a hypercoagulable state. The administration and optimal timing for chemoprophylaxis remain unclear because of concerns about safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients admitted with TBI to a level I trauma center between January 2019 and May 2020. Patient demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale, mobility score, mechanism of injury, comorbidities, timing of chemoprophylaxis and physical therapy, VTE events, and intracranial hemorrhage complications were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 405 patients, 161 received chemoprophylaxis. Eight patients experienced VTE. Receipt of prophylaxis in ≤48 hours was not associated with reduced VTE risk (<i>P</i> = 0.81). However, a 5-point increase in admission mobility score was independently associated with an 84% lower risk of VTE (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Intracranial hemorrhage expansion occurred in 25 patients, with no significant difference between those who did and did not receive prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Higher admission mobility scores predict lower VTE risk in TBI. Early prophylaxis timing was not statistically associated with VTE. These findings underscore the need for prospective studies to determine safe and effective chemoprophylaxis strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":" ","pages":"809-813"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13523933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2026.2677108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to immobilization and a hypercoagulable state. The administration and optimal timing for chemoprophylaxis remain unclear because of concerns about safety and efficacy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients admitted with TBI to a level I trauma center between January 2019 and May 2020. Patient demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale, mobility score, mechanism of injury, comorbidities, timing of chemoprophylaxis and physical therapy, VTE events, and intracranial hemorrhage complications were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of VTE.

Results: Among 405 patients, 161 received chemoprophylaxis. Eight patients experienced VTE. Receipt of prophylaxis in ≤48 hours was not associated with reduced VTE risk (P = 0.81). However, a 5-point increase in admission mobility score was independently associated with an 84% lower risk of VTE (P = 0.02). Intracranial hemorrhage expansion occurred in 25 patients, with no significant difference between those who did and did not receive prophylaxis.

Discussion: Higher admission mobility scores predict lower VTE risk in TBI. Early prophylaxis timing was not statistically associated with VTE. These findings underscore the need for prospective studies to determine safe and effective chemoprophylaxis strategies.

外伤性脑损伤中的静脉血栓栓塞事件。预防的时机重要吗?单中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者由于固定和高凝状态,发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。由于对安全性和有效性的担忧,化学预防的给药和最佳时机仍不清楚。方法:我们对2019年1月至2020年5月在一级创伤中心收治的成年TBI患者进行了回顾性研究。分析患者人口统计学、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、活动能力评分、损伤机制、合并症、化学预防和物理治疗的时机、静脉血栓栓塞事件和颅内出血并发症。采用多元逻辑回归来确定静脉血栓栓塞的预测因素。结果:405例患者中,161例接受了化学预防治疗。8例患者发生静脉血栓栓塞。在≤48小时内接受预防治疗与静脉血栓栓塞风险降低无关(P = 0.81)。然而,入院活动能力评分增加5分与静脉血栓栓塞风险降低84%独立相关(P = 0.02)。25例患者发生颅内出血扩张,接受和未接受预防治疗的患者之间无显著差异。讨论:较高的入院流动性评分预示着较低的TBI静脉血栓栓塞风险。早期预防时机与静脉血栓栓塞无统计学相关性。这些发现强调需要进行前瞻性研究,以确定安全有效的化学预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书