Power of Narcissism Unleashed: Team Proactivity as a Function of Leader Narcissism, Collective Regulatory Focus, and Power Distance

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2026-06-02 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1002/job.70077
Xin Liu, Jingni Dong, Limei Chen, Yu Yu, Peter Harms
{"title":"Power of Narcissism Unleashed: Team Proactivity as a Function of Leader Narcissism, Collective Regulatory Focus, and Power Distance","authors":"Xin Liu,&nbsp;Jingni Dong,&nbsp;Limei Chen,&nbsp;Yu Yu,&nbsp;Peter Harms","doi":"10.1002/job.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite accumulating evidence surrounding the importance of leader narcissism for follower outcomes, its effects on team outcomes, particularly team proactivity, remain opaque. As team proactivity has proven to be a critical factor for organizations to survive and thrive in today's complicated business environment, it is necessary to come to a better understanding of how and when leader narcissism helps or hurts team proactivity. To clarify this relationship, we draw on the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept (NARC) model and social learning theory to propose a dual-path mediation model where leader narcissistic admiration and leader narcissistic rivalry differentially influence team proactivity by fostering different collective regulatory foci. Moreover, we posit that these dual processes are conditioned by team power distance value. Using a field study with multisource and multiwave data from 100 teams, we found competing indirect effects of leader narcissistic admiration on team proactivity: a positive indirect relationship through collective promotion focus and an unexpected negative indirect relationship through collective prevention focus. We also found a negative indirect relationship between leader narcissistic rivalry and team proactivity through collective prevention focus. Furthermore, these two pathways were much stronger for teams with higher rather than lower power distance value. Our work advances the narcissism literature by demonstrating the double-edged effects of leader narcissism on team proactivity at the team level and identifying different mechanisms and conditions under which leader narcissism facilitates and impairs team proactivity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"47 5","pages":"750-768"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite accumulating evidence surrounding the importance of leader narcissism for follower outcomes, its effects on team outcomes, particularly team proactivity, remain opaque. As team proactivity has proven to be a critical factor for organizations to survive and thrive in today's complicated business environment, it is necessary to come to a better understanding of how and when leader narcissism helps or hurts team proactivity. To clarify this relationship, we draw on the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept (NARC) model and social learning theory to propose a dual-path mediation model where leader narcissistic admiration and leader narcissistic rivalry differentially influence team proactivity by fostering different collective regulatory foci. Moreover, we posit that these dual processes are conditioned by team power distance value. Using a field study with multisource and multiwave data from 100 teams, we found competing indirect effects of leader narcissistic admiration on team proactivity: a positive indirect relationship through collective promotion focus and an unexpected negative indirect relationship through collective prevention focus. We also found a negative indirect relationship between leader narcissistic rivalry and team proactivity through collective prevention focus. Furthermore, these two pathways were much stronger for teams with higher rather than lower power distance value. Our work advances the narcissism literature by demonstrating the double-edged effects of leader narcissism on team proactivity at the team level and identifying different mechanisms and conditions under which leader narcissism facilitates and impairs team proactivity.

自恋的力量释放:团队主动性作为领导者自恋的功能,集体监管焦点和权力距离
尽管越来越多的证据表明,领导者自恋对下属结果的重要性,但它对团队结果的影响,尤其是对团队主动性的影响,仍然不清楚。由于团队主动性已被证明是组织在当今复杂的商业环境中生存和发展的关键因素,因此有必要更好地了解领导者自恋如何以及何时有助于或损害团队主动性。为了澄清这种关系,我们借鉴自恋崇拜和竞争概念(NARC)模型和社会学习理论,提出了一个双路径的中介模型,即领导者自恋崇拜和领导者自恋竞争通过培养不同的集体调节焦点而对团队主动性产生差异。此外,我们假设这些双重过程受团队权力距离值的制约。通过对来自100个团队的多源、多波数据的实地研究,我们发现领导者自恋崇拜对团队主动性的间接影响是相互竞争的:通过集体促进关注产生积极的间接影响,通过集体预防关注产生意想不到的消极间接影响。通过集体预防焦点,我们还发现领导者自恋竞争与团队主动性之间存在负向的间接关系。此外,这两种路径在权力距离值较高而较低的团队中更为强烈。本研究从团队层面论证了领导者自恋对团队主动性的双刃剑效应,并确定了领导者自恋促进和损害团队主动性的不同机制和条件,从而推动了自恋研究的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书