Responses of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Protein Bait Applied at Different Densities

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Journal of Applied Entomology Pub Date : 2026-06-02 Epub Date: 2026-02-23 DOI:10.1111/jen.70073
Msizi R. Ramaoka, Aruna Manrakhan, Christopher W. Weldon
{"title":"Responses of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Protein Bait Applied at Different Densities","authors":"Msizi R. Ramaoka,&nbsp;Aruna Manrakhan,&nbsp;Christopher W. Weldon","doi":"10.1111/jen.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effectiveness of odour-based lures for insects is related to their active space, the air volume around an odour source in which an insect will detect and move towards it. This principle applies to protein baits laced with toxicants that are used as either sprays or stations to suppress pest fruit fly populations. Whilst protein bait spray droplets represent multiple odour sources distributed across a tree, a protein bait station being a device containing the bait and hung on a tree acts as a single odour source within the same arena. This study investigated responses by the females of three fruit fly pests [<i>Bactrocera dorsalis</i> (Hendel), <i>Ceratitis capitata</i> (Wiedemann) and <i>Ceratitis cosyra</i> (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae)] to protein bait applied at two densities. Unmated female flies were fed on a diet that was either protein-deficient (sugar only) or protein-rich (sugar and hydrolysed yeast) in the laboratory for 10 days. Fly responses to either 10 droplets of 200 μL each or a single droplet of 2000 μL of a protein hydrolysate solution were quantified in field cages placed in a lemon orchard. Bait density significantly affected protein response by <i>B. dorsalis</i>, <i>C. capitata</i> and <i>C. cosyra</i>, with the majority responding more to higher protein bait density. Additionally, dietary history significantly influenced responses across all species, with flies fed a protein-deficient diet responding more than those fed protein. These results demonstrate that protein bait may be more effective for fruit fly control when distributed as multiple points on a tree compared to a single point, and that protein food sources in an environment would reduce the efficacy of control using protein bait.</p>","PeriodicalId":14987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Entomology","volume":"150 6","pages":"736-742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jen.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of odour-based lures for insects is related to their active space, the air volume around an odour source in which an insect will detect and move towards it. This principle applies to protein baits laced with toxicants that are used as either sprays or stations to suppress pest fruit fly populations. Whilst protein bait spray droplets represent multiple odour sources distributed across a tree, a protein bait station being a device containing the bait and hung on a tree acts as a single odour source within the same arena. This study investigated responses by the females of three fruit fly pests [Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis cosyra (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae)] to protein bait applied at two densities. Unmated female flies were fed on a diet that was either protein-deficient (sugar only) or protein-rich (sugar and hydrolysed yeast) in the laboratory for 10 days. Fly responses to either 10 droplets of 200 μL each or a single droplet of 2000 μL of a protein hydrolysate solution were quantified in field cages placed in a lemon orchard. Bait density significantly affected protein response by B. dorsalis, C. capitata and C. cosyra, with the majority responding more to higher protein bait density. Additionally, dietary history significantly influenced responses across all species, with flies fed a protein-deficient diet responding more than those fed protein. These results demonstrate that protein bait may be more effective for fruit fly control when distributed as multiple points on a tree compared to a single point, and that protein food sources in an environment would reduce the efficacy of control using protein bait.

Abstract Image

不同浓度蛋白饵对果蝇(双翅目:蝗科)的影响
基于气味的诱饵对昆虫的有效性与它们的活动空间有关,昆虫会在气味源周围发现并向其移动的空气量。这一原则适用于含有有毒物质的蛋白质诱饵,用作喷雾剂或站点,以抑制害虫果蝇的数量。蛋白质诱饵喷雾液滴代表了分布在一棵树上的多个气味源,而蛋白质诱饵站是一种包含诱饵并挂在树上的装置,在同一场所中充当单一气味源。研究了三种果蝇(背小实蝇(Hendel)、头角certis (Wiedemann)和尾角certis (Walker))(双翅目:蝗科)雌性对两种密度蛋白饵料的反应。在实验室里,未交配的雌性果蝇被喂食蛋白质缺乏(仅含糖)或蛋白质丰富(含糖和水解酵母)的食物10天。在柠檬园的田间笼中,测定了苍蝇对10滴200 μL或单滴2000 μL水解蛋白溶液的反应。饵料密度显著影响背背小蠊、大头小蠊和大头小蠊对蛋白质的反应,且大多数对蛋白质饵料密度越高反应越强烈。此外,饮食史显著影响了所有物种的反应,喂食蛋白质缺乏饮食的果蝇比喂食蛋白质的果蝇反应更强烈。这些结果表明,蛋白质饵料在树上多点分布比单点分布更有效,并且环境中的蛋白质食物来源会降低蛋白质饵料的控制效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Entomology publishes original articles on current research in applied entomology, including mites and spiders in terrestrial ecosystems. Submit your next manuscript for rapid publication: the average time is currently 6 months from submission to publication. With Journal of Applied Entomology''s dynamic article-by-article publication process, Early View, fully peer-reviewed and type-set articles are published online as soon as they complete, without waiting for full issue compilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书