What Do Lithics Tell Us About Cultural Evolution? Insights From the Central African Record

IF 1.4 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeometry Pub Date : 2026-06-02 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1111/arcm.70107
Isis Isabella Mesfin
{"title":"What Do Lithics Tell Us About Cultural Evolution? Insights From the Central African Record","authors":"Isis Isabella Mesfin","doi":"10.1111/arcm.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While Western historical narratives often incorporate a biased vision of human evolution—driven by a progressive view tied to a progressively evolving state of culture—this paper proposes combining archaeological lithic data with epistemological reflections to critique the modern regime of historicity, where progress is assumed as rational. The reflection begins with archaeological technological evidence from various prehistoric societies of Central Africa, spanning over a million years of lithic technologies whose evolution, notably slow, took unconventional form. The analysis of these lithic artefacts outlines a cultural mosaic among hunter-gatherers, where certain technological trajectories run counter to a universalist narrative. By their very existence, instances of technical convergence challenge the notion of an evolutionary typology—a framework that has been used for decades to underpin scenarios of prehistoric cultural evolution in Africa. This calls into question how can lithics provide a greater understanding of cultural evolution?</p>","PeriodicalId":8254,"journal":{"name":"Archaeometry","volume":"68 S3","pages":"S40-S49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.70107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While Western historical narratives often incorporate a biased vision of human evolution—driven by a progressive view tied to a progressively evolving state of culture—this paper proposes combining archaeological lithic data with epistemological reflections to critique the modern regime of historicity, where progress is assumed as rational. The reflection begins with archaeological technological evidence from various prehistoric societies of Central Africa, spanning over a million years of lithic technologies whose evolution, notably slow, took unconventional form. The analysis of these lithic artefacts outlines a cultural mosaic among hunter-gatherers, where certain technological trajectories run counter to a universalist narrative. By their very existence, instances of technical convergence challenge the notion of an evolutionary typology—a framework that has been used for decades to underpin scenarios of prehistoric cultural evolution in Africa. This calls into question how can lithics provide a greater understanding of cultural evolution?

Abstract Image

石器告诉我们文化演变的什么?来自中非记录的见解
西方的历史叙事往往包含了一种对人类进化的偏见——由一种与文化不断发展的状态相联系的进步观点所驱动——本文建议将考古石器数据与认识论反思相结合,以批判现代的历史性制度,在这种制度中,进步被认为是理性的。反思始于中非各种史前社会的考古技术证据,跨越了一百多万年的石器技术,其进化非常缓慢,采取了非常规的形式。对这些石器文物的分析勾勒出了狩猎采集者之间的文化马赛克,其中某些技术轨迹与普遍主义叙事背道而驰。由于它们的存在,技术趋同的实例对进化类型学的概念提出了挑战——几十年来,进化类型学一直被用来支撑非洲史前文化进化的情景。这就引出了一个问题:石器如何能更好地理解文化进化?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeometry
Archaeometry 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Archaeometry is an international research journal covering the application of the physical and biological sciences to archaeology, anthropology and art history. Topics covered include dating methods, artifact studies, mathematical methods, remote sensing techniques, conservation science, environmental reconstruction, biological anthropology and archaeological theory. Papers are expected to have a clear archaeological, anthropological or art historical context, be of the highest scientific standards, and to present data of international relevance. The journal is published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, in association with Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, ARCHAEOMETRIE, the Society for Archaeological Sciences (SAS), and Associazione Italian di Archeometria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书