Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Economica Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1111/ecca.70038
Ya-Wen Tseng, Jie-Yu Yang, Eric S. Lin, Yating Chuang
{"title":"Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment","authors":"Ya-Wen Tseng,&nbsp;Jie-Yu Yang,&nbsp;Eric S. Lin,&nbsp;Yating Chuang","doi":"10.1111/ecca.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a non-price-based conservation experiment performed among 6723 college dorm residents. We analyse the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention delivered through email, featuring one of two types of social-comparison-based energy consumption feedback: a quintile social comparison message and a mean comparison message. The quintile social comparison message ranks residents' relative energy consumption in quintiles, while the mean comparison message compares their consumption to the average. Our results show that the relative effectiveness of these messages depends on residents' baseline consumption patterns. Users in the higher quintiles (fourth and fifth) are more likely to reduce their energy consumption, while those in the lower quintiles (first and second) tend to increase their electricity usage after receiving the messages. We also observe that this adjustment towards the median consumption level appears to be more pronounced in single- and double-student rooms compared to multiple-student rooms. Using a causal forest approach to examine heterogeneity, we find that certain individual traits and physical factors may influence these room dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48040,"journal":{"name":"Economica","volume":"93 371","pages":"801-838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.70038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a non-price-based conservation experiment performed among 6723 college dorm residents. We analyse the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention delivered through email, featuring one of two types of social-comparison-based energy consumption feedback: a quintile social comparison message and a mean comparison message. The quintile social comparison message ranks residents' relative energy consumption in quintiles, while the mean comparison message compares their consumption to the average. Our results show that the relative effectiveness of these messages depends on residents' baseline consumption patterns. Users in the higher quintiles (fourth and fifth) are more likely to reduce their energy consumption, while those in the lower quintiles (first and second) tend to increase their electricity usage after receiving the messages. We also observe that this adjustment towards the median consumption level appears to be more pronounced in single- and double-student rooms compared to multiple-student rooms. Using a causal forest approach to examine heterogeneity, we find that certain individual traits and physical factors may influence these room dynamics.

社会比较与能源节约:参考群体与室内动态在野外实验中的作用
本文在6723名大学宿舍居民中进行了一项非价格基础的节约实验。我们分析了通过电子邮件传递的行为干预的有效性,其中包括两种基于社会比较的能源消耗反馈:五分之一社会比较信息和平均比较信息。五分位数社会比较信息将居民的相对能源消耗按五分位数排序,而平均比较信息将他们的消耗与平均水平进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,这些信息的相对有效性取决于居民的基线消费模式。高五分之一(第四和第五)的用户更有可能减少他们的能源消耗,而低五分之一(第一和第二)的用户在收到信息后往往会增加他们的用电量。我们还观察到,与多学生房间相比,这种向中位数消费水平的调整在单人间和双人间更为明显。使用因果森林方法来检验异质性,我们发现某些个体特征和物理因素可能影响这些房间动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economica
Economica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Economica is an international journal devoted to research in all branches of economics. Theoretical and empirical articles are welcome from all parts of the international research community. Economica is a leading economics journal, appearing high in the published citation rankings. In addition to the main papers which make up each issue, there is an extensive review section, covering a wide range of recently published titles at all levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书