Biologics reduced infections in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis under immunosuppressants.

IF 2.4
Hsiang-Yuen Tung, Hsien-Tzung Liao, Chung-Ching Wang, Wei-Liang Chen, Chang-Youh Tsai
{"title":"Biologics reduced infections in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis under immunosuppressants.","authors":"Hsiang-Yuen Tung, Hsien-Tzung Liao, Chung-Ching Wang, Wei-Liang Chen, Chang-Youh Tsai","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) alleviate inflammation but may have immunocompromising effects. Previous studies evaluating infection risks in spondyloarthritis (SpA) have yielded inconsistent conclusions. We investigated infection risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving bDMARDs compared with that of those receiving only conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the database at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (from January 1, 2011, to September 30, 2018), we retrospectively identified eligible SpA patients and applied a two-step verification process to confirm serious infections requiring hospitalization. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Site-specific analyses characterized infection patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5568 patients with SpA (4,784 AS, 784 PsA), with a mean age of 42.1 years and male predominance (68.4%). bDMARD prescription was associated with a reduced risk of first serious infection in the overall SpA cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.247, p = 2.4782 × 10 -7 ), as well as in AS (aHR = 0.253, p = 4.73 × 10 -4 ) and PsA (aHR = 0.207, p = 6.69 × 10 -4 ). bDMARD prescription was also associated with significantly lower risks of skin and soft tissue infection in PsA (aHR = 0.252, p = 1.1905 × 10 -2 ) and pneumonia/gastrointestinal infections in SpA. Sulfasalazine (SSZ) was independently associated with an increased infection risk (aHR = 1.630, p = 2 .6276 × 10 Sulfasalazine 2 ); nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were associated with a reduced risk in AS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjunctive bDMARD therapy was associated with a substantially reduced risk of serious infection in AS, PsA, and the overall SpA cohort, potentially because of effective systemic inflammation suppression in SpA and restoration of the skin barrier in PsA. The elevated risk associated with SSZ in AS may reflect channeling bias in refractory patients. Early and appropriate use of bDMARDs in SpA may achieve disease control without compromising immune defense against infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"508-516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13387758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) alleviate inflammation but may have immunocompromising effects. Previous studies evaluating infection risks in spondyloarthritis (SpA) have yielded inconsistent conclusions. We investigated infection risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving bDMARDs compared with that of those receiving only conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Methods: Using the database at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (from January 1, 2011, to September 30, 2018), we retrospectively identified eligible SpA patients and applied a two-step verification process to confirm serious infections requiring hospitalization. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Site-specific analyses characterized infection patterns.

Results: We included 5568 patients with SpA (4,784 AS, 784 PsA), with a mean age of 42.1 years and male predominance (68.4%). bDMARD prescription was associated with a reduced risk of first serious infection in the overall SpA cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.247, p = 2.4782 × 10 -7 ), as well as in AS (aHR = 0.253, p = 4.73 × 10 -4 ) and PsA (aHR = 0.207, p = 6.69 × 10 -4 ). bDMARD prescription was also associated with significantly lower risks of skin and soft tissue infection in PsA (aHR = 0.252, p = 1.1905 × 10 -2 ) and pneumonia/gastrointestinal infections in SpA. Sulfasalazine (SSZ) was independently associated with an increased infection risk (aHR = 1.630, p = 2 .6276 × 10 Sulfasalazine 2 ); nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were associated with a reduced risk in AS.

Conclusion: Adjunctive bDMARD therapy was associated with a substantially reduced risk of serious infection in AS, PsA, and the overall SpA cohort, potentially because of effective systemic inflammation suppression in SpA and restoration of the skin barrier in PsA. The elevated risk associated with SSZ in AS may reflect channeling bias in refractory patients. Early and appropriate use of bDMARDs in SpA may achieve disease control without compromising immune defense against infections.

生物制剂降低了免疫抑制剂作用下强直性脊柱炎和银屑病关节炎的感染。
背景:生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)减轻炎症,但可能有免疫损害作用。先前评估脊椎关节炎(SpA)感染风险的研究得出了不一致的结论。我们调查了接受bDMARDs的强直性脊柱炎(AS)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的感染风险,并与仅接受常规合成疾病缓解抗风湿药物的患者进行了比较。方法:利用台北退伍军人总医院的数据库(2011年1月1日至2018年9月30日),我们回顾性地筛选符合条件的SpA患者,并采用两步验证流程来确认需要住院治疗的严重感染。使用多变量Cox回归对年龄、性别、合并症和伴随药物进行校正,分析事件发生时间。部位特异性分析表征了感染模式。结果:我们纳入了5568例SpA患者(4784例AS, 784例PsA),平均年龄42.1岁,男性占68.4%。在整个SpA队列中,bDMARD处方与首次严重感染的风险降低相关(校正风险比[aHR] 0.247, P=2.4782 × 10 -7),以及as (aHR 0.253, P= 4.73 × 10 -4)和PsA (aHR 0.207, P=6.69 × 10 -4)。bDMARD处方还与PsA组皮肤和软组织感染风险(aHR 0.252, P=1.1905 x 10 -2)和SpA组肺炎/胃肠道感染风险显著降低相关。柳氮磺胺吡啶(SSZ)与感染风险增加独立相关(aHR 1.630, P=2.6276 × 10 -2);非甾体类抗炎药与降低AS风险相关。结论:辅助bDMARD治疗与AS、PsA和整个SpA队列中严重感染的风险显著降低相关,可能是因为SpA有效的全身炎症抑制和PsA的皮肤修复屏障。AS中SSZ相关的风险升高可能反映了难治性患者的通道偏倚。SpA患者早期适当使用bDMARDs可以在不影响免疫防御感染的情况下实现疾病控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书