Stochastic Approximator of Motor Threshold (SAMT) for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Online Software and Its Performance in Clinical Studies.

Boshuo Wang, Vedarsh U Shah, Lari M Koponen, Andrada D Neacsiu, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Paul B Fitzgerald, Lawrence G Appelbaum, Jessica Y Choi, Nimesha Gerlus, Yiru Li, Itay Hadas, Yinming Sun, Mohsen Poorganji, Hadley Daniels, Katie Rodriguez, Efstathia Stephanie Gotsis, Neil W Bailey, Jeydhurga Raveendran, Shona K Brinley, Alexander T Gallo, Stefan M Goetz, Angel V Peterchev
{"title":"Stochastic Approximator of Motor Threshold (SAMT) for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Online Software and Its Performance in Clinical Studies.","authors":"Boshuo Wang, Vedarsh U Shah, Lari M Koponen, Andrada D Neacsiu, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Paul B Fitzgerald, Lawrence G Appelbaum, Jessica Y Choi, Nimesha Gerlus, Yiru Li, Itay Hadas, Yinming Sun, Mohsen Poorganji, Hadley Daniels, Katie Rodriguez, Efstathia Stephanie Gotsis, Neil W Bailey, Jeydhurga Raveendran, Shona K Brinley, Alexander T Gallo, Stefan M Goetz, Angel V Peterchev","doi":"10.1016/j.transm.2026.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The motor threshold (MT) plays a central role in probing brain excitability and individualizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Previously, we proposed stochastic approximation (SA) as a new method for determining TMS MT and demonstrated its excellent speed and accuracy via simulations. SA also has low computational requirements and is theoretically robust to potential model flaws.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aimed to develop a practical SA thresholding method and assess its performance in clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SA thresholding method was implemented as an online software application-SAMT (Stochastic Approximator of MT)-that incorporates features for warning against likely inaccurate MT estimates. Two clinical studies used SAMT and collected 365 small hand muscle MTs from 179 participants to date. SAMT's misestimation warning method marked MTs of 7 thresholding trials as likely inaccurate, and SAMT's performance in the remaining 358 trials was assessed by comparing the MT at each step to the threshold estimated by fitting a sigmoidal probability distribution to the complete muscle response data from the session using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the 25<sup>th</sup> TMS pulse, 99% of the SAMT MTs differed by less than 3.0% (relative) and 1.3% of maximum stimulator output (absolute) from the corresponding fitted MLE sigmoid thresholds and were within the 95% confidence intervals of the MLE thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide the TMS community with a new thresholding tool, SAMT. Combined with the prior simulation results, the experimental assessment presented here supports the practicality and accuracy of the SA thresholding method and the SAMT software.</p>","PeriodicalId":520872,"journal":{"name":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation (2024)","volume":"7 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13221086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation (2024)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transm.2026.100312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The motor threshold (MT) plays a central role in probing brain excitability and individualizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Previously, we proposed stochastic approximation (SA) as a new method for determining TMS MT and demonstrated its excellent speed and accuracy via simulations. SA also has low computational requirements and is theoretically robust to potential model flaws.

Objective: This project aimed to develop a practical SA thresholding method and assess its performance in clinical studies.

Methods: The SA thresholding method was implemented as an online software application-SAMT (Stochastic Approximator of MT)-that incorporates features for warning against likely inaccurate MT estimates. Two clinical studies used SAMT and collected 365 small hand muscle MTs from 179 participants to date. SAMT's misestimation warning method marked MTs of 7 thresholding trials as likely inaccurate, and SAMT's performance in the remaining 358 trials was assessed by comparing the MT at each step to the threshold estimated by fitting a sigmoidal probability distribution to the complete muscle response data from the session using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE).

Results: By the 25th TMS pulse, 99% of the SAMT MTs differed by less than 3.0% (relative) and 1.3% of maximum stimulator output (absolute) from the corresponding fitted MLE sigmoid thresholds and were within the 95% confidence intervals of the MLE thresholds.

Conclusions: We provide the TMS community with a new thresholding tool, SAMT. Combined with the prior simulation results, the experimental assessment presented here supports the practicality and accuracy of the SA thresholding method and the SAMT software.

经颅磁刺激的运动阈值随机逼近器(SAMT):在线软件及其在临床研究中的表现。
背景:运动阈值(MT)在探测脑兴奋性和个体化经颅磁刺激(TMS)中起着核心作用。在此之前,我们提出了随机近似(SA)作为确定TMS MT的新方法,并通过仿真证明了其良好的速度和准确性。SA也具有较低的计算要求,并且理论上对潜在的模型缺陷具有鲁棒性。目的:本项目旨在建立一种实用的SA阈值法,并评估其在临床研究中的表现。方法:SA阈值方法作为在线软件应用程序(samt(随机逼近器))实现,该应用程序包含对可能不准确的MT估计的警告特征。迄今为止,两项临床研究使用了SAMT,并从179名参与者中收集了365个小手肌mt。SAMT的误估计警告方法将7个阈值试验的MT标记为可能不准确,剩余的358个试验通过将每一步的MT与使用最大似然估计(MLE)拟合完整肌肉反应数据的s型概率分布估计的阈值进行比较来评估SAMT的性能。结果:到第25次TMS脉冲,99%的SAMT mt与相应拟合的MLE s型阈值相差小于3.0%(相对)和1.3%的最大刺激器输出(绝对),并且在MLE阈值的95%置信区间内。结论:我们为TMS社区提供了一种新的阈值工具,SAMT。结合前人的仿真结果,本文的实验评估验证了SA阈值法和SAMT软件的实用性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书