Constructs Influencing Patient Perceptions of Use of AI in Medical Imaging Analysis: Systematic Review.

IF 3.3 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Preksha Machaiya Kuppanda, Monika Janda, Liam J Caffery
{"title":"Constructs Influencing Patient Perceptions of Use of AI in Medical Imaging Analysis: Systematic Review.","authors":"Preksha Machaiya Kuppanda, Monika Janda, Liam J Caffery","doi":"10.2196/92969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging has been growing exponentially. Understanding patient perceptions and factors influencing their views of AI is critical to develop adequate strategies to support implementation and acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the constructs that influence patients' perceptions and acceptance of AI's use in the analysis of their medical images to support screening and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to meet the research objective. Relevant articles were found by searching 5 databases. Data were extracted using an iteratively refined framework and synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study designs, populations, health care contexts, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 relevant studies were included in the review. Patient acceptance of AI in medical image analysis emerged from multiple interacting factors. The most consistently reported determinant in 48 studies was that AI implementation should prioritize human-in-the-loop models, positioning AI as supportive tools, working in conjunction with health care providers rather than as an autonomous decision-maker. Other factors identified were performance of the AI, clarity of accountability, trust, and ethical factors. Patients' individual characteristics such as demographics and health history were also noted to influence acceptance indirectly. The review findings were used to draft a conceptual model to draw attention to the complex relationship among the identified factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review informed the development of a conceptual model illustrating the complex and interactive factors shaping patient acceptance of AI in medical imaging, which can be tested prospectively in future studies. Our results highlight that patients' likelihood of accepting AI cannot be attributed to a few factors. Instead, promoting acceptance will require a holistic approach where multiple factors are considered simultaneously and adapted for each use case.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"e92969"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13270170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/92969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging has been growing exponentially. Understanding patient perceptions and factors influencing their views of AI is critical to develop adequate strategies to support implementation and acceptance.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the constructs that influence patients' perceptions and acceptance of AI's use in the analysis of their medical images to support screening and diagnosis.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to meet the research objective. Relevant articles were found by searching 5 databases. Data were extracted using an iteratively refined framework and synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study designs, populations, health care contexts, and outcomes.

Results: A total of 59 relevant studies were included in the review. Patient acceptance of AI in medical image analysis emerged from multiple interacting factors. The most consistently reported determinant in 48 studies was that AI implementation should prioritize human-in-the-loop models, positioning AI as supportive tools, working in conjunction with health care providers rather than as an autonomous decision-maker. Other factors identified were performance of the AI, clarity of accountability, trust, and ethical factors. Patients' individual characteristics such as demographics and health history were also noted to influence acceptance indirectly. The review findings were used to draft a conceptual model to draw attention to the complex relationship among the identified factors.

Conclusions: This review informed the development of a conceptual model illustrating the complex and interactive factors shaping patient acceptance of AI in medical imaging, which can be tested prospectively in future studies. Our results highlight that patients' likelihood of accepting AI cannot be attributed to a few factors. Instead, promoting acceptance will require a holistic approach where multiple factors are considered simultaneously and adapted for each use case.

影响患者在医学影像分析中使用人工智能感知的结构:系统综述。
背景:人工智能(AI)在医学成像中的应用呈指数级增长。了解患者的看法和影响他们对人工智能看法的因素对于制定适当的战略以支持实施和接受至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨影响患者对人工智能用于医学图像分析以支持筛查和诊断的认知和接受程度的结构。方法:为达到研究目的,进行系统评价。通过检索5个数据库找到相关文献。由于研究设计、人群、卫生保健背景和结果的异质性,采用迭代改进的框架提取数据,并以叙述的方式综合数据。结果:共纳入59项相关研究。患者对人工智能在医学图像分析中的接受程度是多种因素相互作用的结果。48项研究中最一致的决定因素是,人工智能的实施应优先考虑人在循环模型,将人工智能定位为支持性工具,与医疗保健提供者合作,而不是作为自主决策者。确定的其他因素包括人工智能的性能、问责制的清晰度、信任和道德因素。患者的个人特征,如人口统计学和健康史,也会间接影响接受度。审查结果被用来起草一个概念模型,以提请注意已确定的因素之间的复杂关系。结论:本综述建立了一个概念模型,说明了影响患者接受医学成像中人工智能的复杂和相互作用因素,可以在未来的研究中进行前瞻性测试。我们的研究结果强调,患者接受人工智能的可能性不能归因于几个因素。相反,促进接受将需要一个整体的方法,其中同时考虑多个因素并为每个用例进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书