Dosimetric assessment of fetal radiation dose in clinical mammography.

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Niilo Saarlemo, Ari-Petteri Ronkainen, Mimmi K Liukkonen, Siru Kaartinen
{"title":"Dosimetric assessment of fetal radiation dose in clinical mammography.","authors":"Niilo Saarlemo, Ari-Petteri Ronkainen, Mimmi K Liukkonen, Siru Kaartinen","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ae757b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. We quantify fetal radiation exposure from standard clinical mammography protocols and assess whether routine pregnancy verification is necessary before clinically indicated mammography.<i>Approach</i>. Measurements were performed on a Hologic Selenia Dimensions system using an Alderson Rando Female anthropomorphic phantom with tissue-equivalent breast slabs. Standard craniocaudal (CC) 2D mammography and tomosynthesis were acquired for two compressed breast thicknesses and four sets of imaging parameters. Air kerma was measured with a calibrated RaySafe Xi Survey detector at representative locations corresponding to the first, second and third trimesters; each configuration was repeated three times and a single configuration was repeated after fully rebuilding the setup to estimate positioning-related variability.<i>Main results</i>Mean measured fetal doses were 0.048μGy-0.264μGy (first trimester), 0.017μGy-0.084μGy (second trimester) and 0.753μGy-7.253μGy (third trimester). Across protocols, CC projections yielded 0.017μGy-2.462μGy and tomosynthesis 0.037μGy-7.253μGy. Dose increased with breast thickness and was highest in the third trimester, consistent with increased scatter and shorter path to the fetus. Between-setup variability for the rebuilt configuration was 36.2%.<i>Significance</i>. Fetal dose from mammography was several orders of magnitude below thresholds associated with deterministic fetal effects and the highest measured values remain far below levels that can be considered clinically significant. These findings suggest that clinically indicated mammography should not generally be delayed solely on the basis of pregnancy status, while recognising that decisions must follow local guidelines, institutional or national policies and individual risk considerations. Routine pregnancy screening prior to mammography is unlikely to provide meaningful clinical benefit in the context of radiation safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae757b","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. We quantify fetal radiation exposure from standard clinical mammography protocols and assess whether routine pregnancy verification is necessary before clinically indicated mammography.Approach. Measurements were performed on a Hologic Selenia Dimensions system using an Alderson Rando Female anthropomorphic phantom with tissue-equivalent breast slabs. Standard craniocaudal (CC) 2D mammography and tomosynthesis were acquired for two compressed breast thicknesses and four sets of imaging parameters. Air kerma was measured with a calibrated RaySafe Xi Survey detector at representative locations corresponding to the first, second and third trimesters; each configuration was repeated three times and a single configuration was repeated after fully rebuilding the setup to estimate positioning-related variability.Main resultsMean measured fetal doses were 0.048μGy-0.264μGy (first trimester), 0.017μGy-0.084μGy (second trimester) and 0.753μGy-7.253μGy (third trimester). Across protocols, CC projections yielded 0.017μGy-2.462μGy and tomosynthesis 0.037μGy-7.253μGy. Dose increased with breast thickness and was highest in the third trimester, consistent with increased scatter and shorter path to the fetus. Between-setup variability for the rebuilt configuration was 36.2%.Significance. Fetal dose from mammography was several orders of magnitude below thresholds associated with deterministic fetal effects and the highest measured values remain far below levels that can be considered clinically significant. These findings suggest that clinically indicated mammography should not generally be delayed solely on the basis of pregnancy status, while recognising that decisions must follow local guidelines, institutional or national policies and individual risk considerations. Routine pregnancy screening prior to mammography is unlikely to provide meaningful clinical benefit in the context of radiation safety.

临床乳房x光检查中胎儿辐射剂量的剂量学评估。
目的:我们量化标准临床乳房x光检查方案中的胎儿辐射暴露,并评估在临床指示的乳房x光检查之前是否需要进行常规妊娠验证。方法:使用Alderson随机女性人形假体与组织等效乳房板在Hologic Selenia Dimensions系统上进行测量。对两种压缩乳房厚度和四组成像参数进行标准颅侧(CC)二维乳房x线摄影和断层合成。使用校准过的RaySafe Xi Survey探测器在孕早期、中期和晚期的代表性位置测量Air kerma;每种配置重复三次,并在完全重建设置后重复单一配置,以估计与定位相关的可变性。主要结果:胎儿平均测量剂量为0.048µGy ~ 0.264µGy(妊娠早期),0.017µGy ~ 0.084µGy(妊娠中期),0.753µGy ~ 7.253µGy(妊娠晚期)。在不同的方案中,CC投影为0.017µGy至2.462µGy,断层合成为0.037µGy至7.253µGy。剂量随着乳房厚度的增加而增加,在妊娠晚期剂量最高,与散度增加和到达胎儿的路径较短一致。重建构型的设置间变异性为36.2%。意义:乳房x光检查的胎儿剂量低于与胎儿确定性效应相关的阈值几个数量级,最高测量值仍远低于可被认为具有临床意义的水平。这些发现表明,临床指征的乳房x光检查一般不应仅仅因为怀孕状况而推迟,同时认识到,决定必须遵循当地指导方针、机构或国家政策以及个人风险考虑。在放射安全方面,乳房x光检查前的常规妊娠筛查不太可能提供有意义的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书