Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the ICU: A Multicenter Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2026-05-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S603569
Yang Li, Ling Xu, Yunfeng Chen
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the ICU: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Yang Li, Ling Xu, Yunfeng Chen","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S603569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional risk tools often lack specificity for ICU acquired DVT. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for accurate DVT risk prediction in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 2000 patients from two centers, partitioned into training, internal testing, and external validation sets. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm identified robust predictors. Eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was utilized for model interpretability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed other ML algorithms and traditional tools (e.g. Caprini score). It achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.822-0.916) in training, 0.850 (95% CI: 0.801-0.900) in internal testing, and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.771-0.888) in external validation. SHAP analysis identified six dominant predictors: immobilization duration, D-dimer, femoral vein catheterization, APACHE II score, malignancy, and age. The RF model successfully captured non-linear interactions, particularly exponential risk increases from prolonged immobilization and elevated D-dimer. DCA demonstrated a higher net clinical benefit than default strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating six readily available clinical variables, the RF model offers a robust and interpretable tool for DVT risk stratification, outperforming traditional scores. To facilitate real-world clinical application, an accessible web-based calculator is being developed to guide early, personalized thromboprophylaxis in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"603569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13221438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S603569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional risk tools often lack specificity for ICU acquired DVT. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for accurate DVT risk prediction in critically ill patients.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 2000 patients from two centers, partitioned into training, internal testing, and external validation sets. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm identified robust predictors. Eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was utilized for model interpretability.

Results: The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed other ML algorithms and traditional tools (e.g. Caprini score). It achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.822-0.916) in training, 0.850 (95% CI: 0.801-0.900) in internal testing, and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.771-0.888) in external validation. SHAP analysis identified six dominant predictors: immobilization duration, D-dimer, femoral vein catheterization, APACHE II score, malignancy, and age. The RF model successfully captured non-linear interactions, particularly exponential risk increases from prolonged immobilization and elevated D-dimer. DCA demonstrated a higher net clinical benefit than default strategies.

Conclusion: Integrating six readily available clinical variables, the RF model offers a robust and interpretable tool for DVT risk stratification, outperforming traditional scores. To facilitate real-world clinical application, an accessible web-based calculator is being developed to guide early, personalized thromboprophylaxis in the ICU.

基于机器学习的ICU下肢深静脉血栓早期预测:一项多中心研究。
目的:深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是重症监护病房(ICU)常见且危及生命的并发症。对于ICU获得性深静脉血栓,传统的风险评估工具往往缺乏特异性。本研究旨在开发和外部验证可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,用于准确预测危重患者DVT风险。方法:本多中心回顾性研究包括来自两个中心的2000例患者,分为训练组、内部测试组和外部验证组。LASSO回归和Boruta算法确定了稳健的预测因子。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准图和决策曲线分析(DCA)对8种ML算法进行了训练和评估。模型可解释性采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)框架。结果:随机森林(RF)模型优于其他ML算法和传统工具(如capritini评分)。训练的auc为0.869 (95% CI: 0.822-0.916),内部测试的auc为0.850 (95% CI: 0.801-0.900),外部验证的auc为0.831 (95% CI: 0.771-0.888)。SHAP分析确定了六个主要预测因素:固定时间、d -二聚体、股静脉置管、APACHE II评分、恶性肿瘤和年龄。RF模型成功捕获了非线性相互作用,特别是长时间固定和d -二聚体升高导致的指数风险增加。DCA表现出比默认策略更高的净临床效益。结论:RF模型整合了6个现成的临床变量,为DVT风险分层提供了一个强大且可解释的工具,优于传统评分。为了促进现实世界的临床应用,正在开发一个可访问的基于网络的计算器,以指导ICU的早期个性化血栓预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书