{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the ICU: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Yang Li, Ling Xu, Yunfeng Chen","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S603569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional risk tools often lack specificity for ICU acquired DVT. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for accurate DVT risk prediction in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 2000 patients from two centers, partitioned into training, internal testing, and external validation sets. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm identified robust predictors. Eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was utilized for model interpretability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed other ML algorithms and traditional tools (e.g. Caprini score). It achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.822-0.916) in training, 0.850 (95% CI: 0.801-0.900) in internal testing, and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.771-0.888) in external validation. SHAP analysis identified six dominant predictors: immobilization duration, D-dimer, femoral vein catheterization, APACHE II score, malignancy, and age. The RF model successfully captured non-linear interactions, particularly exponential risk increases from prolonged immobilization and elevated D-dimer. DCA demonstrated a higher net clinical benefit than default strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating six readily available clinical variables, the RF model offers a robust and interpretable tool for DVT risk stratification, outperforming traditional scores. To facilitate real-world clinical application, an accessible web-based calculator is being developed to guide early, personalized thromboprophylaxis in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"603569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13221438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S603569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional risk tools often lack specificity for ICU acquired DVT. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for accurate DVT risk prediction in critically ill patients.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 2000 patients from two centers, partitioned into training, internal testing, and external validation sets. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm identified robust predictors. Eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was utilized for model interpretability.
Results: The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed other ML algorithms and traditional tools (e.g. Caprini score). It achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.822-0.916) in training, 0.850 (95% CI: 0.801-0.900) in internal testing, and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.771-0.888) in external validation. SHAP analysis identified six dominant predictors: immobilization duration, D-dimer, femoral vein catheterization, APACHE II score, malignancy, and age. The RF model successfully captured non-linear interactions, particularly exponential risk increases from prolonged immobilization and elevated D-dimer. DCA demonstrated a higher net clinical benefit than default strategies.
Conclusion: Integrating six readily available clinical variables, the RF model offers a robust and interpretable tool for DVT risk stratification, outperforming traditional scores. To facilitate real-world clinical application, an accessible web-based calculator is being developed to guide early, personalized thromboprophylaxis in the ICU.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.